Skip to main content
Log in

A robust scheduling algorithm for space telescopes with unpredictable tasks

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The original preset schedule of space telescopes can be disrupted when they receive ultra-high-priority unpredictable tasks. The main objective of this study is to observe such unpredictable tasks, the instability of which leads to failures in delivering the promises made. This paper proposes a method for retaining the robustness of the original plan. We use space-based multi-band variable objects monitor (SVOM) mission as an example to introduce the proposed method. First, the reasons for instability are discussed in detail. Two proactive strategies are proposed to promote the robustness of the schedule. The proactive strategies use the available windows of a given list of jobs. However, the realistic problem of SVOM is analysed using a rescheduling algorithm based on NSGA-II experiments with SVOM scenarios show that the two proposed strategies are effective in reducing the instability caused by unpredictable interruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vieira G E, Herrmann J W, Lin E. Rescheduling manufacturing systems: A framework of strategies, policies, and methods. J Sched, 2003, 6: 39–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Huo Y, Reznichenko B, Zhao H. Minimizing total weighted completion time with an unexpected machine unavailable interval. J Sched, 2014, 17: 161–172

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo W, Luo T, Goebel R, et al. Rescheduling due to machine disruption to minimize the total weighted completion time. J Sched, 2018, 21: 565–578

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu Z, Xu D. Single-machine scheduling with workload-dependent tool change durations and equal processing time jobs to minimize total completion time. J Sched, 2018, 21: 461–482

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu P, Wang C, Lu X. A note on minimizing total weighted completion time with an unexpected machine unavailable interval. J Sched, 2019, 22: 255–262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen N Q, Yalaoui F, Amodeo L, et al. Total completion time minimization for machine scheduling problem under time windows constraints with jobs’ linear processing rate function. Comput Oper Res, 2018, 90: 110–124

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Gao L, Li X. A hybrid genetic algorithm and tabu search for a multi-objective dynamic job shop scheduling problem. Int J Prod Res, 2013, 51: 3516–3531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Policella N, Smith S F, Cesta A, et al. Generating robust schedules through temporal flexibility. In: Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. Whistler, 2004. 209–218

  9. Pinedo M, Hadavi K. Scheduling: Theory, algorithms and systems development. 1992, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46773-85

  10. Billaut J C, Moukrim A, Sanlaville E. Flexibility and Robustness in Scheduling. Weinheim: Wiley-ISTE, 2008. 352

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith D E. Choosing objectives in over-subscription planning. In: 14th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. Whistler, 2004. 393–401

  12. Himmiche S, Marangé P, Aubry A, et al. Robust production scheduling under machine failures: A DES based evaluation approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51: 271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Wang R, Xu M. Rescheduling of observing spacecraft using fuzzy neural network and ant colony algorithm. Chin J Aeronautics, 2014, 27: 678–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenstra J K, Rinnooy Kan A H G, Brucker P. Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Ann Discrete Math, 1977, 1: 343–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham R L, Lawler E L, Lenstra J K, et al. Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey. Ann Discrete Math, 1979, 5: 287–326

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wall M B. A genetic algorithm for resource-constrained scheduling. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Cambridge: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta S V, Uzsoy R M. Predictable scheduling of a job shop subject to breakdowns. IEEE Trans Robot Automat, 1998, 14: 365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YanFeng Gu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. XDA15040100 & XDA15040400).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Gu, Y., Jaubert, J. et al. A robust scheduling algorithm for space telescopes with unpredictable tasks. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 571–584 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1639-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1639-4

Keywords

Navigation