Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-mode energy management strategy for hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system based on improved global optimization algorithm

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heavy commercial vehicles equipped with a hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system (HHMAS) often operate under complex road conditions. Selecting appropriate operating mode and realizing reasonable energy management to match unpredictable road conditions are the keys to the driving performance and fuel economy of HHMAS. Therefore, a multi-mode energy management strategy (MM-EMS) based on improved global optimization algorithm is proposed in this study for HHMAS. First, an improved dynamic programming (DP) algorithm for HHMAS is developed. This improved DP algorithm considers the effect of SOC and vehicle speed, thereby preventing the calculation results from falling into local optimization. This algorithm also reduces the dimension of the control variable data grid, and the calculation time is reduced by 35% without affecting the accuracy. Second, a MM-EMS with hierarchical control is proposed. This strategy extracts the optimal control rules from the results of the improved DP algorithm. Then it divides the system’s operating region into two types, namely, single-mode working region and mixedmode working region. In the single-mode working region, mode switching is realized through fixed thresholds. In the mixedmode working region, a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) is adopted to determine a target mode and realize SOC tracking control. Finally, the designed MM-EMS is verified separately in offline simulation and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) under actual vehicle test cycles. Simulation results show that the results between HIL and offline simulation are largely coincidence. Besides, in comparison with the engine optimal control strategy, the designed MM-EMS can achieve an approximate optimal control, with oil savings of 3.96%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bravo R R S, De Negri V J, Oliveira A A M. Design and analysis of a parallel hydraulic—Pneumatic regenerative braking system for heavy-duty hybrid vehicles. Appl Energy, 2018, 225: 60–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amjad S, Neelakrishnan S, Rudramoorthy R. Review of design considerations and technological challenges for successful development and deployment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renew Sust Energy Rev, 2010, 14: 1104–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang H T, Li X G, Liu X Z, et al. Enhancing fuel cell durability for fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles through strategic power management. Appl Energy, 2019, 241: 483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng X H, Li G H, Yin G D, et al. Model predictive control-based dynamic coordinate strategy for hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system of a heavy commercial vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 101: 97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Filipi Z, Kim Y J. Hydraulic hybrid propulsion for heavy vehicles: Combining the simulation and engine-in-the-loop techniques to maximize the fuel economy and emission benefits. Oil Gas Sci Tech, 2010, 65: 155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Midgley W, Cathcart H, Cebon D. Modelling of hydraulic regenerative braking systems for heavy vehicles. P I Mech Eng D-J Automob Eng, 2013, 227: 1072–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baseley S, Ehret C, Greif E, et al. Hydraulic hybrid systems for commercial vehicles. In: SAE 2007 Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress & Exhibition. 2007-01-4150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cunningham S. Hydrostatic drive. US Patent, No. 6675575. 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. EauClaire M. Joining forces. OEM Off-Highway, 2008, 23: 40–47

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ragavan S V, Kumar J M, Ponnambalam S G. Design of a mecha-tronic drive train with regenerative braking. Appl Mech Mater, 2011, 110–116: 5111–5117

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peng J K, He H W, Xiong R. Rule based energy management strategy for a series-parallel plug-in hybrid electric bus optimized by dynamic programming. Appl Energy, 2017, 185: 1633–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shi D H, Wang S H, Pisu P, et al. Modeling and optimal energy management of a power split hybrid electric vehicle. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y H, Jiao X H, Li L, et al. A hybrid dynamic programming-rule based algorithm for real-time energy optimization of plug-in hybrid electric bus. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 2542–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu L H, Qian L J, Zomorodi H, et al. Design and optimization of equivalent consumption minimization strategy for 4WD hybrid electric vehicles incorporating vehicle connectivity. Sci China Tech Sci, 2018, 61: 147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johri R, Filipi Z. Low-cost pathway to ultra efficient city car: Series hydraulic hybrid system with optimized supervisory control. SAE Int J Engines, 2010, 2: 505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiang C L, Ding F, Wang W D, et al. MPC-based energy management with adaptive Markov-chain prediction for a dual-mode hybrid electric vehicle. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vu T V, Chen C K. A control oriented model and application for control system design of a series hydraulic hybrid vehicle. In: 2014 2nd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). IEEE, 2014. 51–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Qi Y L, Wang W D, Xiang C L, et al. Economic MPC-based transient control for a dual-mode power-split HEV. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 1917–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertsekas D P. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific, 2005

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Paganelli G, Ercole G, Brahma A. General supervisory control policy for the energy optimization of charge-sustaining hybrid electric vehicles. JSAE Rev, 2001, 22: 511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Serrao L, Onori S, Rizzoni G. ECMS as a realization of Pontryagin’s minimum principle for HEV control. In: 2009 American Control Conference. St. Louis, 2009. 3964–3969

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hippalgaonkar R, Ivantysynova M. Optimal power management of hydraulic hybrid mobile machines—Part I: Theoretical studies, modeling and simulation. J Dyn Syst Measur Control, 2016, 138: 051002

  23. Hippalgaonkar R, Ivantysynova M. Optimal power management of hydraulic hybrid mobile machines—Part II: Machine implementation and measurements. J Dyn Syst Measur Control, 2016, 138: 051003

  24. Deppen T O, Alleyne A G, Stelson K A, et al. Predictive energy management for parallel hydraulic hybrid passenger vehicle. In: Sci China Tech Sci ASME 2010 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. Cambridge, 2010. 185–192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yan F J, Wang J M, Huang K S. Hybrid electric vehicle model predictive control torque-split strategy incorporating engine transient characteristics. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2012, 61: 2458–2467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Borhan H A, Vahidi A, Phillips A M, et al. Predictive energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. In: 2009 American Control Conference. St. Louis, USA, 2009. 3970–3976

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Song K, Li F Q, Hu X, et al. Multi-mode energy management strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles based on driving pattern identification using learning vector quantization neural network algorithm. J Power Sources, 2018, 389: 230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellman R. Dynamic Programming. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou H C, Xu Z P, Liu L, et al. A rule-based energy management strategy based on dynamic programming for hydraulic hybrid vehicles. Math Problems Eng, 2018, 2018: 9492026

  30. Zhang X, Göhlich D. Improvement in the vehicle stability of dis-tributed-drive electric vehicles based on integrated model-matching control. P I Mech Eng D-J Automob Eng, 2017, 232: 341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lenzo B, Bucchi F, Sorniotti A, et al. On the handling performance of a vehicle with different front-to-rear wheel torque distributions. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 57: 1685–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou Y, Guo N, Zhang X. An integrated control strategy of path following and lateral motion stabilization for autonomous distributed drive electric vehicles. P I Mech Eng D-J Automob Eng, 2019, 2019: 095440701988416

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, X., Wu, Z., Wang, Y. et al. Multi-mode energy management strategy for hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system based on improved global optimization algorithm. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 2082–2097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1526-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1526-8

Keywords

Navigation