Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electrolytic groundwater circulation well for trichloroethylene degradation in a simulated aquifer

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An in situ groundwater remediation process, termed EGCW, was developed in this study by integrating in-well groundwater electrolysis into groundwater circulation well. Groundwater circulation carries electrolytically generated O2 and H2 into the impacted aquifer for in situ biodegradation of contaminants. In a two-dimensional tank filled with field sandy sediments, simulated trichloroethylene (TCE)-contaminated groundwater was circulated between an injection well with electrodes inside and a pumping well. Results from a 50-day EGCW experiment show that in-well electrolysis oxygenated most region near the injection well, and 10 mg/L TCE was mainly biodegraded aerobically to about 2.7 mg/L (73% removal) by the indigenous microbes. Aerobic TCE degradation was enhanced by the pulsed addition of acetate. Together with the proofs of stable carbon isotope fractionation (enrichment factor: −0.57‰–−1.53‰) and microbial community variation after EGCW treatment, aerobic cometabolism was proposed to be the most likely mechanism for TCE degradation. It is interesting to find that the intrinsic organic carbon in aquifer matrix could fuel the aerobic TCE degradation, particularly at low TCE concentrations. EGCW treatment is advantageous in terms of supplying appropriate dosages of electron acceptor (O2) and donor (H2) for in situ bioremediation because groundwater electrolysis and circulation are expedient and controllable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCarty P L. Groundwater contamination by chlorinated solvents: History, remediation technologies and strategies. In: Stroo H F, Ward C H, eds. In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. New York: Springer, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wan M, Liu R, Tang L R, et al. Pollution and statutes of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater of industry (in Chinese). Environ Eng, 2011, 29: 397–411

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lu Q, Li H, Ling K F, et al. Investigation of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater from a typical contaminated site in Pudong District, Shanghai (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2015, 36: 1730–1737

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu H Y, Xin B D, Sun Y, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of organic contamination in groundwater in the Beijing plain (in Chinese). Hydrogeol Eng Geol, 2014, 41: 34–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alleman B C. In-well treatment for chlorinated solvents remediation. In: Stroo H F, Ward C H, eds. In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. New York: Springer, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Field applications of in situ remediation technologies: Ground-water circulation wells. Technical Report. Washington DC: EPA, 1998. EPA 542-R-98-009, http://www.epa.gov/swertio1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tawabini B, Makkawi M. Remediation of MTBE-contaminated groundwater by integrated circulation wells and advanced oxidation technologies. Water Sci Technol Water Supply, 2018, 18: 399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyer M, van Heiningen E, Gerritse J. A field trial for in-situ bior-emediation of 1,2-DCA. Eng Geol, 2003, 70: 315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lakhwala F S, Mueller J G, Desrosiers R J. Demonstration of a microbiologically enhanced vertical ground water circulation well technology at a superfund site. Groundwater Monitor Remed, 1998, 18: 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Němeček J, Steinová J, Špánek R, et al. Thermally enhanced in situ bioremediation of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated sol-vents—A field test. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 622–623: 743–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponsin V, Coulomb B, Guelorget Y, et al. In situ biostimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation by nitrate and phosphate injection using a dipole well configuration. J Contam Hydrol, 2014, 171: 22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Q, Tu K, Sun H Z, et al. Investigation on the sustainability and efficiency of single-well circulation (SWC) groundwater heat pump systems. Renew Energy, 2019, 130: 656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao Y S, Qu D, Zhou R, et al. Efficacy of forming biofilms by Pseudomonas migulae AN-1 toward in situ bioremediation of aniline-contaminated aquifer by groundwater circulation wells. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2016, 23: 11568–11573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geng Y K, Li Z H, Yuan L, et al. Degradation and mineralization of 2-chlorophenol in a single-stage anaerobic fixed-bed bioreactor. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Reynolds D, Gent D. Electrokinetic-enhanced (EK-enhanced) amendment delivery for remediation of low permeability and heterogeneous materials. Technical Report. ESTCP Project ER-201325, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert D M. Electrolytic reactive barriers forchlorinated solvent remediation. In: Stroo H F, Ward C H, eds. In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. New York: Springer, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. EKOGRID. Five EKOGRIDTM Cases [OL]. Eko Harden Technologies Oy, 2019 [2019-12-26]. https://ekogrid.fi/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/EKOGRID-Five-In-situ-Remediation-Cases.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goel R K, Liu L B, Flora J R V, et al. Modeling and comparison of electrolytic aeration and ORC® aeration of anoxic groundwater in a simulated laboratory aquifer. Environ Eng Sci, 2003, 20: 677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franz J A, Williams R J, Flora J R V, et al. Electrolytic oxygen generation for subsurface delivery: Effects of precipitation at the cathode and an assessment of side reactions. Water Res, 2002, 36: 2243–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jasmann J R, Gedalanga P B, Borch T, et al. Synergistic treatment of mixed 1,4-dioxane and chlorinated solvent contaminations by coupling electrochemical oxidation with aerobic biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol, 2017, 51: 12619–12629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lohner S T, Tiehm A. Application of electrolysis to stimulate microbial reductive PCE dechlorination and oxidative VC biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 7098–7104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lohner S T, Becker D, Mangold K M, et al. Sequential reductive and oxidative biodegradation of chloroethenes stimulated in a coupled bioelectro-process. Environ Sci Technol, 2011, 45: 6491–6497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weathers L J, Parkin G F, Alvarez P J. Utilization of cathodic hydrogen as electron donor for chloroform cometabolism by a mixed, methanogenic culture. Environ Sci Technol, 1997, 31: 880–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tiehm A, Lohner S T, Augenstein T. Effects of direct electric current and electrode reactions on vinyl chloride degrading microorganisms. Electrochim Acta, 2009, 54: 3453–3459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wick L Y, Shi L, Harms H. Electro-bioremediation of hydrophobic organic soil-contaminants: A review of fundamental interactions. Electrochim Acta, 2007, 52: 3441–3448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunkeler D, Aravena R. Determination of compound-specific carbon isotope ratios of chlorinated methanes, ethanes, and ethenes in aqueous samples. Environ Sci Technol, 2000, 34: 2839–2844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Zhou A, Gan Y, et al. Variability in carbon isotope fractio-nation of trichloroethene during degradation by persulfate activated with zero-valent iron: Effects of inorganic anions. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 548–549: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Palau J, Soler A, Teixidor P, et al. Compound-specific carbon isotope analysis of volatile organic compounds in water using solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A, 2007, 1163: 260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Darlington R, Lehmicke L, Andrachek R G, et al. Biotic and abiotic anaerobic transformations of trichloroethene and cis-1,2-di-chloroethene in fractured sandstone. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 4323–4330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dong Y R, Liang X M, Krumholz L R, et al. The relative contributions of abiotic and microbial processes to the transformation of tetra-chloroethylene and trichloroethylene in anaerobic microcosms. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 690–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vancheeswaran S, Hyman M R, Semprini L. Anaerobic biotransformation of trichlorofluoroethene in groundwater microcosms. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33: 2040–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J J, Joslyn A P, Chiu P C. 1,1-dichloroethene as a predominant intermediate of microbial trichloroethene reduction. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40: 1830–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Danko A S. In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: A review. J Hazard Mater, 2015, 283: 382–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shukla A K, Upadhyay S N, Dubey S K. Current trends in tri-chloroethylene biodegradation: A review. Critical Rev Biotech, 2014, 34: 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Conrad M E, Brodie E L, Radtke C W, et al. Field evidence for co-metabolism of trichloroethene stimulated by addition of electron donor to groundwater. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 4697–4704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gaza S, Schmidt K R, Weigold P, et al. Aerobic metabolic trichloroethene biodegradation under field-relevant conditions. Water Res, 2019, 151: 343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt K R, Gaza S, Voropaev A, et al. Aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethene without auxiliary substrates. Water Res, 2014, 59: 112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeannottat S, Hunkeler D. Chlorine and carbon isotopes fractionation during volatilization and diffusive transport of trichloroethene in the unsaturated zone. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 3169–3176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chu K H, Mahendra S, Song D L, et al. Stable carbon isotope fractionation during aerobic biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38: 3126–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barth J A C, Slater G, Schüth C, et al. Carbon isotope fractionation during aerobic biodegradation of trichloroethene by Burkholderia cepacia G4: A tool to map degradation mechanisms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2002, 68: 1728–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Clingenpeel S R, Moan J L, McGrath D M, et al. Stable carbon isotope fractionation in chlorinated ethene degradation by bacteria expressing three toluene oxygenases. Front Microbiol, 2012, 3: 63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gafni A, Lihl C, Gelman F, et al. δ C and δ Cl isotope fractionation to characterize aerobic vs anaerobic degradation of trichloroethylene. Environ Sci Technol Lett, 2018, 5: 202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nemir A, David M M, Perrussel R, et al. Comparative phylogenetic microarray analysis of microbial communities in TCE-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 2010, 80: 600–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen F, Li Z L, Liang B, et al. Electrostimulated bio-dechlorination of trichloroethene by potential regulation: Kinetics, microbial community structure and function. Chem Eng J, 2019, 357: 633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ryoo D, Shim H, Canada K, et al. Aerobic degradation of tetrachloroethylene by toluene-o-xylene monooxygenase of Pseudomonas stutzeri OX1. Nat Biotechnol, 2000, 18: 775–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shim H, Ryoo D, Barbieri P, et al. Aerobic degradation of mixtures of tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylenes, and vinyl chloride by toluene-o-xylene monooxygenase of Pseudomonas stutzeri OX1. Appl Microbiol Biotech, 2001, 56: 265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liang S H, Liu J K, Lee K H, et al. Use of specific gene analysis to assess the effectiveness of surfactant-enhanced trichloroethylene co-metabolism. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 198: 323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Carere C R, McDonald B, Peach H A, et al. Hydrogen oxidation influences glycogen accumulation in a verrucomicrobial methanotroph. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Carere C R, Hards K, Houghton K M, et al. Mixotrophy drives niche expansion of verrucomicrobial methanotrophs. ISME J, 2017, 11: 2599–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mohammadi S, Pol A, van Alen T A, et al. Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV, a thermoacidophilic ‘Knallgas’ methanotroph with both an oxygen-sensitive and -insensitive hydrogenase. ISME J, 2017, 11: 945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Aulenta F, Reale P, Catervi A, et al. Kinetics of trichloroethene dechlorination and methane formation by a mixed anaerobic culture in a bio-electrochemical system. Electrochim Acta, 2008, 53: 5300–5305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lampron K. Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes with elemental iron: The role of microorganisms. Water Res, 2001, 35: 3077–3084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan S H, Xie S W, Zhao K Y, et al. Field tests of in-well electrolysis removal of arsenic from high phosphate and iron groundwater. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 644: 1630–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chu M Y J, Bennett P J, Dolan M E, et al. Concurrent treatment of 1,4-dioxane and chlorinated aliphatics in a groundwater recirculation system via aerobic cometabolism. Groundwater Monit R, 2018, 38: 53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bagastyo AY, Radjenovic J, Mu Y, et al. Electrochemical oxidation of reverse osmosis concentrate on mixed metal oxide (MMO) titanium coated electrodes. Water Res, 2011, 45: 4951–4959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gilbert D, Sale T, Petersen M. Electrically induced redox barriers for treatment of groundwater. Technical Report. ESTCP Project ER-0112, 2008

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Mao X H, Yuan S H, Fallahpour N, et al. Electrochemically induced dual reactive barriers for transformation of TCE and mixture of contaminants in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 12003–12011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    SongHu Yuan, Yang Liu, Peng Zhang, Man Tong & Hui Liu

Authors
  1. SongHu Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Man Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SongHu Yuan.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1802504), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2018CFA028), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (Grant No. CUGGC06).

Supplementary Information for

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, P. et al. Electrolytic groundwater circulation well for trichloroethylene degradation in a simulated aquifer. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 251–260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1521-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1521-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation