Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid uncertainties-based analysis and optimization design of powertrain mounting systems

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this study, a hybrid uncertainties-based analysis and optimization method is presented for the designs of the powertrain mounting system (PMS) involving mixed uncertainties. In the presented method, the PMS parameters with sufficient data are treated as random variables, while those with limited information are defined as interval variables. Then, an uncertainty-based analysis method called as hybrid interval-random perturbation-central difference method (HIRP-CDM), is proposed to compute the hybrid interval-random outputs of the inherent characteristics of the PMS in concerned directions. In addition, the hybrid interval-random-Monte Carlo method (HIR-MCM) is developed to verify the computational accuracy of HIRP-CDM. Next, an optimization model mixed uncertainties is built up for the PMS design based on HIRP-CDM, in which the hybrid intervalrandom outputs of the concerned inherent characteristics are adopted to construct the design objective and constrains. The complex optimization problem can be effectively settled by means of HIRP-CDM. The effectiveness of the presented method is verified by a numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu Y, Naganathan N G, Dukkipati R V. A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems. Mechanism Machine Theor, 2001, 36: 123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shangguan W B. Engine mounts and powertrain mounting systems: A review. IJVD, 2009, 49: 237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin W, Shangguan W B, Luo G, et al. A method for estimating mount isolations of powertrain mounting systems. J Sound Vib, 2018, 426: 278–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeong T, Singh R. Analytical methods of decoupling the automotive engine torque roll axis. J Sound Vib, 2000, 234: 85–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lü H, Cai Z, Feng Q, et al. An improved method for fuzzy-interval uncertainty analysis and its application in brake instability study. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 2018, 342: 142–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lü H, Feng Q, Cai Z, et al. An optimization method for brake instability reduction with fuzzy-boundary interval variables. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part D-J Automobile Eng, 2019, 233: 3209–3221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papadrakakis M, Lagaros N D, Tsompanakis Y. Structural optimization using evolution strategies and neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 1998, 156: 309–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heaney K D, Cox H. A tactical approach to environmental uncertainty and sensitivity. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2006, 31: 356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Capiez-Lernout E, Soize C. Design optimization with an uncertain vibroacoustic model. J Vib Acoustics, 2008, 130: 021001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurtado J E, Alvarez D A. The encounter of interval and probabilistic approaches to structural reliability at the design point. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 2012, 225-228: 74–94

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamiñski M. Application of the generalized perturbation-based stochastic boundary element method to the elastostatics. Eng Anal Bound Elem, 2007, 31: 514–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seçgin A, Dunne J F, Zoghaib L. Extreme-value-based statistical bounding of low, mid, and high frequency responses of a forced plate with random boundary conditions. J Vib Acoustics, 2012, 134: 021003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamiñski M. Generalized perturbation-based stochastic finite element method in elastostatics. Comput Struct, 2007, 85: 586–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia B, Yu D. Response probability analysis of random acoustic field based on perturbation stochastic method and change-of-variable technique. J Vib Acoustics, 2013, 135: 051032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandit M K, Singh B N, Sheikh A H. Stochastic perturbation-based finite element for deflection statistics of soft core sandwich plate with random material properties. Int J Mech Sci, 2009, 51: 363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khine Y Y, Creamer D B, Finette S. Acoustic propagation in an uncertain waveguide environment using stochastic basis expansions. J Comp Acous, 2010, 18: 397–441

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Adhikari S. Doubly spectral stochastic finite-element method for linear structural dynamics. J Aerosp Eng, 2011, 24: 264–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu J, Shangguan W B. Robust optimization design method for powertrain mounting systems based on six sigma quality control criteria. IntJ Automot Tech, 2010, 11: 651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu J, Liu X, Shan Y, et al. Robustness optimization of engine mounting system based on Six Sigma and torque roll axis decoupling method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng, 2019, 233: 1047–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia B, Yin H, Yu D. Nondeterministic wave-based methods for lowand mid-frequency response analysis of acoustic field with limited information. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2017, 84: 169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xia B, Qin Y, Yu D, et al. Dynamic response analysis of structure under time-variant interval process model. J Sound Vib, 2016, 381: 121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xia B Z, Qin Y, Chen N, et al. Optimization of uncertain acoustic metamaterial with Helmholtz resonators based on interval model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang C, Fu C M, Ni B Y, et al. Interval arithmetic operations for uncertainty analysis with correlated interval variables. Acta Mech Sin, 2016, 32: 743–752

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu J, Luo Z, Zhang N, et al. A new interval uncertain optimization method for structures using Chebyshev surrogate models. Comput Struct, 2015, 146: 185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie Y, Zhang W, Feng X, et al. Powertrain mounting system with uncertainty using Chebyshev interval method. Technical Paper. Huazhong University of Science and Tech: SAE, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sirafi M, Chang Y P, Qatu M S. Robustness of mount systems for idle NVH, Part I: Centre of Gravity (CG) mounts. IJVNV, 2006, 2: 317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu J. Optimization method for powertrain mounting systems with uncertain parameters. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automob Eng, 2012, 226: 147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai B, Shangguan W B, Lü H. An efficient analysis and optimization method for powertrain mounting systems involving interval uncertainty. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part D-J Automobile Eng, 2019, 9431: 095440701988037

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xia B, Yu D, Liu J. Hybrid uncertain analysis for structural-acoustic problem with random and interval parameters. J Sound Vib, 2013, 332: 2701–2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lü H, Yu D. Optimization design of a disc brake system with hybrid uncertainties. Adv Eng Software, 2016, 98: 112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang L, Wang X, Wu D, et al. Non-probabilistic time-variant reliability assessment (NTRA) for the active control of vibration systems with convex uncertainties. ISA Trans, 2018, 83: 276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lü H, Shangguan W B, Yu D. A new hybrid uncertainty analysis method and its application to squeal analysis with random and interval variables. Probab Eng Mech, 2018, 51: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lü H, Shangguan W B, Yu D. A universal approach to squeal analysis of the disc brakes involving various types of uncertainty. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part D-J Automobile Eng, 2018, 232: 812–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cai B, Shangguan W B, Lü H. An efficient analysis and optimization method for the powertrain mounting system with hybrid random and interval uncertainties. Eng Optimization, 2019, 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson S R, Subhedar J W. Computer optimization of engine mounting systems. Technical Paper. General Motors Corp: SAE, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xia B, Yu D. Modified sub-interval perturbation finite element method for 2D acoustic field prediction with large uncertain-but-bounded parameters. J Sound Vib, 2012, 331: 3774–3790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee D H, Hwang W S, Kim C M. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of an engine mount system using an FRF-based substructuring method. J Sound Vib, 2002, 255: 383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nechak L, Gillot F, Besset S, et al. Sensitivity analysis and Kriging based models for robust stability analysis of brake systems. Mech Res Commun, 2015, 69: 136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Lü.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51605167, 51975217), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (Grant No. 201804010092), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT (Grant No. 2019MS058).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, B., Shangguan, WB., Lü, H. et al. Hybrid uncertainties-based analysis and optimization design of powertrain mounting systems. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 838–850 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1477-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1477-8

Keywords

Navigation