Skip to main content
Log in

Suggested closed-loop response characteristics for tanker in aerial refueling via mission-oriented evaluation

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The flight control law design for tanker should ensure that the closed-loop response can meet the aerial refueling mission requirements. In order to reveal the movement characteristics of the tanker and the handling characteristics of the pilot in aerial refueling, the flight path capture and hold under gust disturbance task is designed as the demonstration maneuver mission to evaluate the flying qualities for tanker in aerial refueling task, which is based on the design requirements of maneuvering tasks used in mission-oriented flying qualities assessment. By analyzing the flight path tracking and holding requirements of the tanker in aerial refueling mission, the relevant parameters that reflect the response characteristics of the tanker in pitch and roll axes are put forward. The ground flight simulation test based on mission-oriented flight quality assessment is conducted, and the test pilot’s assessment results based on Cooper-Harper rating and PIO scales are obtained for different flight control law configurations. The suggested requirements of the closed-loop response characteristics of the pitch and roll axes of the tanker are put forward, which can be specifications for the aerial refueling mode flight control design of tanker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas P R, Bhandari U, Bullock S, et al. Advances in air to air refuelling. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2014, 71: 14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Su Z, Wang H, Shao X, et al. A robust back-stepping based trajectory tracking controller for the tanker with strict posture constraints under unknown flow perturbations. Aerosp Sci Tech, 2016, 56: 34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloy A W, Khan M M. Modeling of the receiver aircraft in air-to-air refueling. J Aircraft, 2002, 38: 393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ro K, Kamman J W. Modeling and simulation of hose-paradrogue aerial refueling systems. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2010, 33: 53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Waishek J, Dogan A, Blake W. Derivation of the dynamics equations of receiver aircraft in aerial refueling. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2009, 32: 586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dogan A, Blake W. Maneuverability of large receiver of different size and weight in aerial refueling. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2014, 37: 1880–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J H, Sevil H E, Dogan A, et al. Estimation of receiver aircraft states and wind vectors in aerial refueling. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2014, 37: 265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloy A W, Lea K A. Directional stability of a large receiver aircraft in air-to-air refueling. J Aircraft, 1995, 32: 453–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iloputaife O, Svoboda G, Bailey T. Handling qualities design of the C- 17A for receiver-refueling. In: Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. San Diego, 1996. AIAA-96-3746

    Google Scholar 

  10. Specification M. MIL-F-8785C. Military Specification Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Standard M. Flying qualities of piloted aircraft. MIL-STD-1797A ed, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prieto Saiz L. A330 multi role tanker transport: The way of certification. In: 2008 U.S. Air Force T&E Days. Los Angeles, 2008. AIAA- 2008-1635

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley J, Emerson K. The testing of fixed wing tanker and receiver aircraft to establish their air-to-air refuelling capabilities. AGARDAG- 300, 1992, Flight Test Techniques Series - Volume 11

  14. Roberts L. KC-135R low altitude air refueling flight test program. In: Orbital Debris Conference: Technical Issues andFuture Directions. Baltimore, 1990. AIAA-90-1265-CP

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klyde D H, Mitchell D G, Latimer K J. Development of the probeand- drogue handling qualities demonstration maneuver. J Guidance Control Dyn, 1999, 22: 528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taschner M J. A handling qualities investigation of conventional, rate command/attitude hold, and attitude command/attitude hold response types in the probe and drogue air refueling task. Air Force Institute of Technology, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taschner M J. A handling qualities investigation of selected responsetypes for the air refueling Task. In: 20th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Baltimore, 1995. AIAA-95-3428-CP

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell D G, Hoh R H, Aponso B L, et al. Proposed incorporation of mission-oriented flying qualities into MIL-STD-1797A. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leggett D, Cord T. Flying qualities demonstration maneuvers. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Portland, 1994. AAIA-94-2133-CP

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L, Guo Y, Zhang Q, et al. Suggestion for aircraft flying qualities requirements of a short-range air combat mission. Chin J Aeronautics, 2017, 30: 881–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller C J. Nonlinear dynamic inversion baseline control law: Architecture and performance predictions. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Portland, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klyde D H, Aponso B L, Mitchell D G, et al. Development of demonstration maneuvers for aircraft handling qualities evaluation. In: 22nd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. New Orleans, 1997. AIAA-97-3653

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson D J, Riley D R, Citurs K D. Aircraft maneuvers for the evaluation of flying qualities and agility. Volume 2: Maneuver descriptions and selection guide. Technical Report. AD-A273685. 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Latimer K J. A limited investigation of probe-and-drogue aerial refueling tasks to evaluate closed-loop handling qualities (HAVE GAS II). Technical Report. AFFTC-TR-97-13. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson D J, Riley D R, Citurs K D, et al. Aircraft maneuvers for the evaluation of flying qualities and agility. Volume 1: Maneuver development process and initial maneuver set. Technical Report. New Haven: Wright Laboratory, 1993. AD-A273913

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harper R P, Cooper G E. Handling qualities and pilot evaluation. J Guidance Control Dyn, 1986, 9: 515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Acosta D M, Yildiz Y, Craun R W, et al. Piloted evaluation of a control allocation technique to recover from pilot-induced oscillations. J Aircraft, 2015, 52: 130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LiXin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, T., Zhang, Q., Yin, H. et al. Suggested closed-loop response characteristics for tanker in aerial refueling via mission-oriented evaluation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 62, 490–501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9325-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9325-4

Keywords

Navigation