Skip to main content
Log in

A feedback latching controller for two-body wave energy converters under irregular wave conditions

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Latching control is considered to be an effective way to improve the energy absorption of a wave energy converter (WEC). Recently, a latching control method was realized in a hydraulic power take-off (PTO) system and was demonstrated to be effective in one-body WECs. However, the effectiveness of latching control for two-body WECs still needs to be tested. In this paper, a feedback latching controller is proposed for a conceptual two-body WEC. In this conceptual design, a permanent-magnet linear generator (PMLG) is adopted as the PTO system, and a pure water hydraulic cylinder system is designed for performing the latching control. A feedback control strategy based on the measurement of latching force is established, formulated and tested numerically under realistic irregular wave conditions. The effects of the wave peak period and the PTO damping coefficient on the effectiveness of the latching control is also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed feedback latching control is effective for improving the annual power absorption of the two-body WEC. Furthermore, compared to another latching control, the proposed control is more practical because it does not require any knowledge of the wave conditions or the dynamics of the whole WEC system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mavrakos S A. Hydrodynamic coefficients in heave of two concentric surface-piercing truncated circular cylinders. Appl Ocean Res, 2004, 26: 84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Falcão A F O, Cândido J J, Justino P A P, et al. Hydrodynamics of the IPS buoy wave energy converter including the effect of non-uniform acceleration tube cross section. Renew Energy, 2012, 41: 105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polinder H, Damen M E C, Gardner F. Linear PM generator system for wave energy conversion in the AWS. IEEE Trans On Energy Convers, 2004, 19: 583–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brekken T K, Von Jouanne A, Han H Y. Ocean wave energy overview and research at oregon state university. In: IEEE Power Electronics and Machines in Wind Applications. Lincoln, 2009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeung R W, Peiffer A, Tom N, et al. Design, analysis, and evaluation of the UC-Berkeley wave-energy extractor. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 2012, 134: 021902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Budal K, Falnes J. Interacting point absorbers with controlled motion. Power Sea Waves, 1980. 381–399

    Google Scholar 

  7. Babarit A, Duclos G, Clément A H. Comparison of latching control strategies for a heaving wave energy device in random sea. Appl Ocean Res, 2004, 26: 227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoskin R, Nichols N. Optimal strategies for phase control of wave energy devices. In: McCormick M E, Kim Y C, eds. Utilization of Ocean Waves—Wave to Energy Conversion. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers. 1986. 184–199

  9. Falcão A F O. Phase control through load control of oscillating-body wave energy converters with hydraulic PTO system. Ocean Eng, 2008, 35: 358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kara F. Time domain prediction of power absorption from ocean waves with latching control. Renew Energy, 2010, 35: 423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheng W, Alcorn R, Lewis A. On improving wave energy conversion, part II: Development of latching control technologies. Renew Energy, 2015, 75: 935–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Budal K, Falnes J, Lillebekke P M, et al. The Norwegian wave-power buoy project. In: The Second International Symposium On Wave Energy Utilization. Trondheim, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korde U A. Latching control of deep water wave energy devices using an active reference. Ocean Eng, 2002, 29: 1343–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cândido J J, Justino P A P S. Modelling, control and Pontryagin Maximum Principle for a two-body wave energy device. Renew Energy, 2011, 36: 1545–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henriques J C C, Lopes M F P, Gomes R P F, et al. On the annual wave energy absorption by two-body heaving WECs with latching control. Renew Energy, 2012, 45: 31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Falnes J. Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems: Linear Interactions Including Wave-Energy Extraction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss G, Li G, Mueller M, et al. Optimal control of wave energy converters using deterministic sea wave prediction. In: Fuelling the Future: Advances in Science and Technologies for Energy Generation, Transmission and Storage. London: Brown-Walker Press, 2012. 396

    Google Scholar 

  18. Belmont M R, Horwood J M K, Thurley R W F, et al. Filters for linear sea-wave prediction. Ocean Eng, 2006, 33: 2332–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fusco F, Ringwood J V. A study of the prediction requirements in real-time control of wave energy converters. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2012, 3: 176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li G, Weiss G, Mueller M, et al. Wave energy converter control by wave prediction and dynamic programming. Renew Energy, 2012, 48: 392–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scruggs J T, Lattanzio S M, Taflanidis A A, et al. Optimal causal control of a wave energy converter in a random sea. Appl Ocean Res, 2013, 42: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fusco F, Ringwood J. Suboptimal causal reactive control of wave energy converters using a second order system model. In: Proceedings of the 21st (2011) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. 2011. 687–694

    Google Scholar 

  23. Price A, Forehand D, Wallace A. Time-span of future information necessary for theoretical acausal optimal control of wave energy converters. In: Accepted invited paper for the European Control Conference. Budapest, 2009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Budar K, Falnes J. A resonant point absorber of ocean-wave power. Nature, 1975, 256: 478–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Falnes J. Wave-energy conversion through relative motion between two single-mode oscillating bodies. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng, 1999, 121: 32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. ANSYS. 2010. AQWA-LINE Manual. United Kingdom: ANSYS, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tao L, Dray D. Hydrodynamic performance of solid and porous heave plates. Ocean Eng, 2008, 35: 1006–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iuppa C, Cavallaro L, Vicinanza D, et al. Investigation of suitable sites for wave energy converters around Sicily (Italy). Ocean Sci, 2015, 11: 543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShouQiang Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, K., Wang, D., Qiu, S. et al. A feedback latching controller for two-body wave energy converters under irregular wave conditions. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 61, 1114–1126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9308-9

Keywords

Navigation