Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 317–329 | Cite as

A new strategy for integrated urban water management in China: Sponge city



Urban water-related problems associated with rapid urbanization, including waterlogging, water pollution, the ecological degradation of water, and water shortages, have caused global concerns in recent years. In 2013, in order to mitigate increasingly severe urban water-related problems, China set forth a new strategy for integrated urban water management (IUWM) called the “Sponge City”. This is the first holistic IUWM strategy implemented in a developing country that is still undergoing rapid urbanization, and holds promise for application in other developing countries. This paper aims to comprehensively summarize the sponge city. First, this paper reviews prior studies and policies on urban water management in China as important background for the sponge city proposal. Then, the connotations, goals, and features of the sponge city are summarized and discussed. Finally, the challenges, research needs, and development directions pertinent to the sponge city are discussed based on investigations and studies conducted by the authors. The sponge city in China has a short history—given this, there are many issues that should be examined with regard to the stepwise implementation of the Sponge City Programme (SCP). Accordingly, the authors perceive this study as only the beginning of abundant studies on the sponge city.


flexible adaptation urban hydrological cycle low impact development green infrastructure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Liu D. Water supply: China’s sponge cities to soak up rainwater. Nature, 2016, 537: 307Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xia J, Zhang Y Y, Xiong L H, et al. Opportunities and challenges of the Sponge City construction related to urban water issues in China. Sci China Earth Sci, 2017, 60: 652–658Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu H, Jia Y, Niu C. “Sponge city” concept helps solve China’s urban water problems. Environ Earth Sci, 2017, 76: 473Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shao W, Zhang H, Liu J, et al. Data integration and its application in the sponge city construction of China. Procedia Eng, 2016, 154: 779–786Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loubet P, Roux P, Loiseau E, et al. Life cycle assessments of urban water systems: A comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Water Res, 2014, 67: 187–202Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saraswat C, Kumar P, Mishra B K. Assessment of stormwater runoff management practices and governance under climate change and urbanization: An analysis of Bangkok, Hanoi and Tokyo. Environ Sci Policy, 2016, 64: 101–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ice G. History of innovative best management practice development and its role in addressing water quality limited waterbodies. J Environ Eng, 2004, 130: 684–689Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu C, Hong J, Jia H, et al. Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of a LID-BMP treatment train system: A case study in China. J Clean Prod, 2017, 149: 227–237Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellis J B, Lundy L. Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales. J Environ Manage, 2016, 183: 630–636Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu A, Guan Y, Egodawatta P, et al. Selecting rainfall events for effective water sensitive urban design: A case study in gold coast city, Australia. Ecol Eng, 2016, 92: 67–72Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fletcher T D, Shuster W, Hunt W F, et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J, 2015, 12: 525–542Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim H S, Lu X X. Sustainable urban stormwater management in the tropics: An evaluation of Singapore’s ABC Waters Program. J Hydrol, 2016, 538: 842–862Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fletcher T D, Mitchell V G, Deletic A, et al. Chapter 1—Introduction. In: Fletcher T D, Deletic A, Eds. Data Requirements for Integrated Urban Water Management. Paris: UNESCO Publishing and Taylor & Francis, 2007Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rogers P. Integrated urban water resources management. In: Proceedings of Natural Resources Forum. New York: Wiley Online Library, 1993Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Motsinger J, Kalita P, Bhattarai R. Analysis of best management practices implementation on water quality using the soil and water assessment tool. Water, 2016, 8: 145Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang W, Che W. Connotation and multi-angle analysis of sponge city construction (in Chinese). Water Resour Prot, 2016, 32: 19–26Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Rooijen D J, Turral H, Wade Biggs T. Sponge city: Water balance of mega-city water use and wastewater use in Hyderabad, India. Irrig Drain, 2005, 54: S81–S91Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alexander S, Mercer D. Internal Migration in Victoria, Australia— Testing the ‘Sponge City’ Model. Urban Policy Res, 2007, 25: 229–255Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang J Y, Wang Y T, Hu Q F, et al. Discussion and views on some issues of the sponge city construction in China (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2016, 27: 793–799Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang J. A new method for stormwater drainage system design (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 1993: 31–34Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ye Z, Liu X, Hu D, et al. Calculation and results evaluation of integrated area runoff coefficient (in Chinese). China Munic Eng, 1994: 43–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen J, Lu L. The design flood calculation of municipal waterlogging control (in Chinese). Guangdong Water Resour Hydropower, 1995, 3: 46–50Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xia C L. Runoff concentration simulation of mini-basins. J Hefei Univ Technol, 2000, 23: 979–983Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu J. Study on urban storm water model (in Chinese). J Hohai Univ, 1997: 20–24Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cui Y, Bai X, Lei S. Model and method of real-time dispatching of Beijing urban rainwater system (in Chinese). J Wuhan Univ Hydraul Electr Eng, 1998: 16–21Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Che W. Discussion on rainwater utilization technology of watershortage cities in China (in Chinese). China Water Wastewater, 1999, 15: 22–23Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li J, Che W, Meng G, et al. Design of urban rainwater utilization scheme and technical and economic analysis (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2001, 27: 25–28Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song J, Li H, Li Q. Urban rainfall resources utilization and its effects on eco-environment (in Chinese). Chin J Ecol, 2003, 22: 32–35Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng X T. Discussion on some problems of modern urban water planning: A case study of Panyu district, Guangzhou city (in Chinese). Water Resour Dev Res, 2004, 4: 18–24Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ma W F, Zhao X H, Wang H Y, et al. Study on optimizing allocation of reclaimed water and fresh water resourcesc (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2005, 21: 41–44Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yu K, Han X, Zhu Q. The ecological infrastructure approach to solve the problems of urban ecological environment (in Chinese). J Nat Resour, 2007, 22: 808–816Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu K, Zhang L. The flood and waterlog adaptive landscapes in ancient Chinese cities in the Yellow river basin (in Chinese). Urban Plann Forum, 2007: 85–91Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dong L, Che W, Li H Y, et al. Present status and problems of rainwater utilization plan in some Chinese cities (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2007, 23: 1–5Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zuo J, Liu C, Zheng H, et al. Countermeasures and characteristics of Beijing urban rainwater utilization (in Chinese). Resour Sci, 2008, 30: 990–998Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Che W, Lv F, Li J, et al. Typical stormwater and flood management systems in developed countries and their inspiration (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2009, 25: 12–17Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li J, Wang W, Bian J, et al. Eco-technologies and case study on disposal of urban road runoff (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2010, 26: 60–64Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Che W, Zhang W, Wang J, et al. Low impact development and green Infrastructure: Measures of solving urban stormwater problems (in Chinese). Constr Sci Technol, 2010: 48–51Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dong S Q, Han Z G. Study on planning an “eco-sponge city” for rainwater utilization (in Chinese). Urban Stud, 2011, 18: 37–41Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang W, Che W, Wang J, et al. Management of urban stormwater runoff by green infrastructures. Water Wastewater Eng, 2011, 27: 22–27Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jia H, Lu Y, Yu S L, et al. Planning of LID-BMPs for urban runoff control: The case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep Purif Technol, 2012, 84: 112–119Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang J. The vital problems for the urbanization and urban hydrology today (in Chinese). Hydro-Sci Eng, 2012: 1–4Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mo L, Yu K. Structure the urban green sponge: Study on planning an ecological stormwater regulation system (in Chinese). Urban Stud, 2012, 19: 136–140Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ren X, Xie Y, Zhu S. The research of how to face and solve the city waterlogging in the urban development and transformation (in Chinese). Urban Stud, 2012, 19: 71–77Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jiang L L, Ying J, Xu J T. Research on urban stormwater management based on green infrastructure: A case study of New York city, USA (in Chinese). J Chin Urban Forestry, 2012, 10: 59–62Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xie Y. Urban drainage and waterlogging disaster prevention planning (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2013, 29: 105–108Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Huang G, Huang S. Simulation study on effect of rainwater utilization measures on urban stormwater based on Infoworks CS (in Chinese). Water Resour Power, 2013: 1–4Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yao Ha, Lu Y, Jia H, et al. The change of urban rainfall runoff control legal system in the USA and its reference to China (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2013: 214–218Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Che W, Yang Z, Zhao Y. Analysis of urban flooding control and major and minor drainage systems in China (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2013, 29: 13–19Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jia H, Ma H, Sun Z, et al. A closed urban scenic river system using stormwater treated with LID-BMP technology in a revitalized historical district in China. Ecol Eng, 2014, 71: 448–457Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xing G, Sun J, Dong Y, et al. Change and revelation of urban waterlogging control measures—From drainage to storage and then to infiltration (in Chinese). J Saf Environ, 2014, 14: 141–145Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu J H, Wang H, Gao X R, et al. Review on urban hydrology (in Chinese). Chin Sci Bull (Chin Ver), 2014, 59: 3581–3590Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang W, Pang J. Sponge city construction should be an important content of urban water management in the new era (in Chinese). Water Resour Dev Res, 2014, 14: 5–7Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yu K, Xu T, Li D, et al. A review: Urban water resilience (in Chinese). Urban Stud, 2015: 75–83Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yu K, Li D, Yuan H, et al. Sponge city: Theory and practice (in Chinese). Plann Stud, 2015, 39: 26–36Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Che W, Zhao Y, Li J, et al. Explanation of sponge city development technical guide: Basic concepts and comprehensive goals (in Chinese). Water Wastewater Eng, 2015: 1–5Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang H, Ding L, Cheng X, et al. The improvement of joint operation for multi-reservoir water supply system with external water resource (in Chinese). Shuili Xuebao, 2015, 46: 1261–1271Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hu N, Li X, Ge X Y. Change with water—The rational cognition of sponge city system from the perspective of urban green space system (in Chinese). Chin Landsc Archit, 2015, 31: 21–25Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang J, Wang Y, Hu Q, et al. Discussion and views on some issues of the sponge city construction in China (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2016, 27: 793–799Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang W, Che W. Connotation and multi-angle analysis of sponge city construction (in Chinese). Water Resour Prot, 2016, 32: 19–26Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang W, Wang J, Che H, et al. Experience of sponge city master plan: A case study of Nanning city (in Chinese). Urban Plann, 2016, 40: 44–52Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Xia N P, Yang G S, Pan D P. Measurement of financing risks of constructing sponge cityprojects based on FAHP-CIM (in Chinese). J Econ Water Resour, 2016, 34: 30–33Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Geng X, Zhao Y, Che W. Public-private partnerships in the sponge city (in Chinese). Urban Stud, 2017, 24: 125–129Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Li Y, Qiu J, Zhao B, et al. Quantifying urban ecological governance: A suite of indices characterizes the ecological planning implications of rapid coastal urbanization. Ecol Indicat, 2017, 72: 225–233Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xia J, Shi W, Wang Q, et al. Discussion of several hydrological issues regarding sponge city construction (in Chinese). Water Resour Prot, 2017, 33: 1–8Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cheng T, Xu Z, Song S. Rainfall-runoff simulations for Xinglong sponge city pilot area of Jinan (in Chinese). J Hydroelec Eng, 2017, 36: 1–11Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jiao S, Zhang X, Xu Y. A review of Chinese land suitability assessment from the rainfall-waterlogging perspective: Evidence from the Su Yu Yuan area. J Clean Prod, 2017, 144: 100–106Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhang J, Wang Y T, He R, et al. Discussion on the urban flood and waterlogging and causes analysis in China (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2016, 27: 485–491Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chen S, Li Y X, Shin J Y, et al. Constructing confidence intervals of extreme rainfall quantiles using Bayesian, bootstrap, and profile likelihood approaches. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 573–585Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhu Z, Chen Z, Chen X, et al. Approach for evaluating inundation risks in urban drainage systems. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 553: 1–12Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Liu B, Qu F, Guo S, et al. A pilot study of the sludge recycling enhanced coagulation-ultrafiltration process for drinking water: The effects of sludge recycling ratio and coagulation stirring strategy. Water, 2017, 9: 183Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ouyang W, Guo B, Hao F, et al. Modeling urban storm rainfall runoff from diverse underlying surfaces and application for control design in Beijing. J Environ Manage, 2012, 113: 467–473Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhang B, Xie G, Li N, et al. Effect of urban green space changes on the role of rainwater runoff reduction in Beijing, China. Landsc Urban Plann, 2015, 140: 8–16Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wang B, Shao D G, Mu G L, et al. An eco-functional classification for environmental flow assessment in the Pearl River Basin in Guangdong, China. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 265–275Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hong W, Yang C, Chen L, et al. Ecological control line: A decade of exploration and an innovative path of ecological land management for megacities in China. J Environ Manage, 2017, 191: 116–125Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, et al. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manage, 2014, 146: 107–115Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yong Z, Pei Y, Chen Y. Study on city water shortage of China (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2006, 17: 389–394Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Stec A, Kordana S. Analysis of profitability of rainwater harvesting, gray water recycling and drain water heat recovery systems. Resour Conserv Recy, 2015, 105: 84–94Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee K E, Mokhtar M, Mohd Hanafiah M, et al. Rainwater harvesting as an alternative water resource in Malaysia: Potential, policies and development. J Clean Prod, 2016, 126: 218–222Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Eduful M, Shively D. Perceptions of urban land use and degradation of water bodies in Kumasi, Ghana. Habitat Int, 2015, 50: 206–213Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Huang D B, Bader H P, Scheidegger R, et al. Confronting limitations: New solutions required for urban water management in Kunming city. J Environ Manage, 2007, 84: 49–61Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Serrao-Neumann S, Renouf M, Kenway S J, et al. Connecting landuse and water planning: Prospects for an urban water metabolism approach. Cities, 2017, 60: 13–27Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jiang Y, Shi T, Gu X. Healthy urban streams: The ecological continuity study of the Suzhou creek corridor in Shanghai. Cities, 2016, 59: 80–94Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Li Y, Li Y, Wu W. Threshold and resilience management of coupled urbanization and water environmental system in the rapidly changing coastal region. Environ Pollut, 2015, 208: 87–95Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chen W Y. Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: A hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China) (in Chinese). Landsc Urban Plann, 2017, 157: 170–179Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    He G, Yan J, Sha J, et al. Exploration of an optimal policy for water resources management including the introduction of advanced sewage treatment technologies in Zaozhuang city, China. Water, 2016, 8: 608Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yin J, Yu D, Wilby R. Modelling the impact of land subsidence on urban pluvial flooding: A case study of downtown Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 544: 744–753Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Liang Y, Jiang C, Ma L, et al. Government support, social capital and adaptation to urban flooding by residents in the Pearl River Delta area, China. Habitat Int, 2017, 59: 21–31Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jin X, Xu X, Xiang X, et al. System-dynamic analysis on socioeconomic impacts of land consolidation in China. Habitat Int, 2016, 56: 166–175Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wu P, Tan M. Challenges for sustainable urbanization: A case study of water shortage and water environment changes in Shandong, China. Procedia Environ Sci, 2012, 13: 919–927Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Tan Y, Xu H, Jiao L, et al. A study of best practices in promoting sustainable urbanization in China. J Environ Manage, 2017, 193: 8–18Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wu H, Huang G, Meng Q, et al. Deep tunnel for regulating combined sewer overflow pollution and flood disaster: A case study in Guangzhou city, China. Water, 2016, 8: 329Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Liu A, Egodawatta P, Guan Y, et al. Influence of rainfall and catchment characteristics on urban stormwater quality. Sci Total Environ, 2013, 444: 255–262Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhao C S, Shao N F, Yang S T, et al. Identifying the principal driving factors of water ecosystem dependence and the corresponding indicator species in a pilot city, China. J Hydrol, 2018, 556: 488–499Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Feng Y, Burian S, Pomeroy C. Potential of green infrastructure to restore predevelopment water budget of a semi-arid urban catchment. J Hydrol, 2016, 542: 744–755Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Byrne J A, Lo A Y, Jianjun Y. Residents’ understanding of the role of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in Hangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plann, 2015, 138: 132–143Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Qiu B. The connotation, approach and prospect of sponge city (LID) (in Chinese). Constr Sci Technol, 2015: 11–18Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Liu C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, et al. The LID pattern for maintaining virtuous water cycle in urbanized area: A preliminary study of planning and techniques for sponge city (in Chinese). J Water Resour, 2016, 31: 719–731Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mell I C, Henneberry J, Hehl-Lange S, et al. To green or not to green: Establishing the economic value of green infrastructure investments in The Wicker, Sheffield. Urban Forry Urban Gree, 2016, 18: 257–267Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sörensen J, Persson A, Sternudd C, et al. Re-thinking urban flood management—Time for a regime shift. Water, 2016, 8: 332Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Kang N, Kim S, Kim Y, et al. Urban drainage system improvement for climate change adaptation. Water, 2016, 8: 268Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sperotto A, Torresan S, Gallina V, et al. A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy). Sci Total Environ, 2016, 562: 1031–1043Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Brown K, Kamruzzaman M, Beecham S. Trends in sub-daily precipitation in Tasmania using regional dynamically downscaled climate projections. J Hydrol-Regional Studies, 2017, 10: 18–34Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hakimdavar R, Culligan P J, Guido A, et al. The soil water apportioning method (SWAM): An approach for long-term, low-cost monitoring of green roof hydrologic performance. Ecol Eng, 2016, 93: 207–220Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Jia H, Yao H, Tang Y, et al. LID-BMPs planning for urban runoff control and the case study in China. J Environ Manage, 2015, 149: 65–76Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Bach P M, Rauch W, Mikkelsen P S, et al. A critical review of integrated urban water modelling—Urban drainage and beyond. Environ Model Software, 2014, 54: 88–107Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Stanchev P, Ribarova I. Complexity, assumptions and solutions for eco-efficiency assessment of urban water systems. J Clean Prod, 2016, 138: 229–236Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Teng J, Jakeman A J, Vaze J, et al. Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environ Model Softw, 2017, 90: 201–216Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Mallinis G, Karteris M, Theodoridou I, et al. Development of a nationwide approach for large scale estimation of green roof retrofitting areas and roof-top solar energy potential using VHR natural colour orthoimagery and DSM data over Thessaloniki, Greece. Remote Sens Lett, 2014, 5: 548–557Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Yang B, Li S. Green infrastructure design for stormwater runoff and water quality: Empirical evidence from large watershed-scale community developments. Water, 2013, 5: 2038–2057Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Toran L. Water level loggers as a low-cost tool for monitoring of stormwater control measures. Water, 2016, 8: 346Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Votsis A. Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki’s apartment prices. Ecol Econo, 2017, 132: 279–289Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Chui T F M, Liu X, Zhan W. Assessing cost-effectiveness of specific LID practice designs in response to large storm events. J Hydrol, 2016, 533: 353–364Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Mao X, Jia H, Yu S L. Assessing the ecological benefits of aggregate LID-BMPs through modelling. Ecol Model, 2017, 353: 139–149Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Xing G, Sun J, Dong Y, et al. Change and revelation of urban waterlogging control measures—From drainage to storage and then to infiltration (in Chinese). J Saf Environ, 2014, 14: 141–145Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Huang W, Gao Q X, Cao G, et al. Effect of urban symbiosis development in China on GHG emissions reduction. Adv Clim Change Res, 2016, 7: 247–252Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Lee S, Lee B. The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the U.S. household sector. Energ Policy, 2014, 68: 534–549Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Gocht A, Espinosa M, Leip A, et al. A grassland strategy for farming systems in Europe to mitigate GHG emissions—An integrated spatially differentiated modelling approach. Land Use Policy, 2016, 58: 318–334Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Gonzalez-Salazar M A, Venturini M, Poganietz W R, et al. A general modeling framework to evaluate energy, economy, land-use and GHG emissions nexus for bioenergy exploitation. Appl Energ, 2016, 178: 223–249Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Liu Y, Gao C, Lu Y. The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: The role of population density. J Clean Prod, 2017, 157: 299–309Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Friesen J, Rodriguez Sinobas L, Foglia L, et al. Environmental and socio-economic methodologies and solutions towards integrated water resources management. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 581-582: 906–908Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chao Mei
    • 1
  • JiaHong Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • WeiWei Shao
    • 1
  1. 1.China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchState Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River BasinBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Transportation and Civil Engineering & ArchitectureFoshan UniversityGuangdongChina
  3. 3.Engineering and Technology Research Center for Water Resources and Hydroecology of the Ministry of Water ResourcesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations