Skip to main content
Log in

Economic MPC-based transient control for a dual-mode power-split HEV

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existing research into hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) control is mainly focussed on the optimisation of the power distribution between a conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) and an alternative power source (usually a battery pack), however, transient control, which is a key technique that affects both fuel economy and the drivability of the HEV, has not been fully addressed. Especially in dual-mode power-split HEVs, due to the different dynamic characteristics of the actuators in the transmission, and its complicated speed-torque relationship, transient control also affects the precision of power distribution and the speed of response of the electric output power. To improve the transient control performance, the design of an economic model predictive control (EMPC)-based transient controller for a dual-mode power-split HEV is developed. By incorporating an experimental identification model of a diesel ICE in a control-oriented transmission model, a better coordination among the actuators involved in HEV transmission can be achieved. Moreover, an ICE efficiency index is also added to the objective function to improve ICE fuel efficiency during this transient process. Then, a fast MPC method is applied to reduce the on-line computation effort required of the proposed control algorithm. By the flexible application of the EMPC and an innovative ICE model which is suited to the control-oriented model in EMPC, the transient control performance was improved. The effectiveness, and the real-time performance, of the control algorithm are validated by way of MATLAB™/Simulink-based simulations, as well as test-bed experiments combined with the use of the RapidECU platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li K, Chen T, Luo Y, et al. Intelligent environment-friendly vehicles: Concept and case studies. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 2012, 13: 318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan C C, Bouscayrol A, Chen K. Electric, hybrid, and fuel-cell vehicles: Architectures and modeling. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2010, 59: 589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang W D, Han L J, Xiang C L, et al. Synthetical efficiency-based optimization for the power distribution of power-split hybrid electric vehicles. Chin J Mech Eng, 2014, 27: 58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mashadi B, Emadi S. Dual-mode power-split transmission for hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2010, 59: 3223–3232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qin K J, Wang E H, Zhao H, et al. Development and experimental validation of a novel hybrid powertrain with dual planetary gear sets for transit bus applications. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 2085–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li H, Yan Q, Xiang C, et al. Analysis method and principle of dual-mode electro-mechanical variable transmission program. Chin J Mech Eng, 2012, 25: 524–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li L, You S, Yang C, et al. Driving-behavior-aware stochastic model predictive control for plug-in hybrid electric buses. Appl Energy, 2016, 162: 868–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wirasingha S G, Emadi A. Classification and review of control strategies for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2011, 60: 111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salmasi F R. Control strategies for hybrid electric vehicles: Evolution, classification, comparison, and future trends. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2007, 56: 2393–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y H, Jiao X H, Li L, et al. A hybrid dynamic programming-rule based algorithm for real-time energy optimization of plug-in hybrid electric bus. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 2542–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sezer V, Gokasan M, Bogosyan S. A novel ECMS and combined cost map approach for high-efficiency series hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2011, 60: 3557–3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia C Y, Zhang C. Real-time optimization power-split strategy for hybrid electric vehicles. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 814–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li W, Xu G, Xu Y. Online learning control for hybrid electric vehicle. Chin J Mech Eng, 2012, 25: 98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Y, Chen Z, Yan B J, et al. A learning method for energy optimization of the plug-in hybrid electric bus. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1242–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kimura A, Abe T, Sasaki S. Drive force control of a parallel-series hybrid system. Jsae Rev, 1999, 20: 337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Syed F U, Ming K, Czubay J, et al. Fuzzy control to improve highvoltage battery power and engine speed control in a hybrid electric vehicle. In: Annual Meeting of the North American on Fuzzy Information Processing Society. Detroit, MI, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Syed F U, Kuang M L, Hao Ying M L. Active damping wheel-torque control system to reduce driveline oscillations in a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2009, 58: 4769–4785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Sun Z. Dynamic analysis and multivariable transient control of the power-split hybrid powertrain. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2015, 20: 3085–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li L, You S X, Yang C. Multi-objective stochastic MPC-based system control architecture for plug-in hybrid electric buses. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2016, 63: 4752–4763

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan L, Zhao H, Chen H, et al. Nonlinear MPC-based slip control for electric vehicles with vehicle safety constraints. Mechatronics, 2016, 38: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rawlings J B, Bonne D, Jorgensen J B, et al. Unreachable setpoints in model predictive control. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2008, 53: 2209–2215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellis M, Durand H, Christofides P D. A tutorial review of economic model predictive control methods. J Process Control, 2014, 24: 1156–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Angeli D, Amrit R, Rawlings J B. On average performance and stability of economic model predictive control. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2012, 57: 1615–1626

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Boyd S. Fast model predictive control using online optimization. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech, 2010, 18: 267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen Y, Wang J. Fast and global optimal energy-efficient control allocation with applications to over-actuated electric ground vehicles. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech, 2012, 20: 1202–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu X, Chen H, Gao B, et al. Data-driven predictive gearshift control for dual-clutch transmissions and FPGA implementation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J Y, Shen T. Real-time fuel economy optimization with nonlinear mpc for phevs. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 2016, 24: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Zhang Y B, Yang C, et al. Model predictive control-based efficient energy recovery control strategy for regenerative braking system of hybrid electric bus. Energy Conv Manage, 2016, 111: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Song Z F, Xia C L, Liu T, et al. A modified predictive control strategy of three-phase grid-connected converters with optimized action time sequence. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 1017–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo L, Gao B, Li Y, et al. A fast algorithm for nonlinear model predictive control applied to HEV energy management systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li K, Li S E, Ahn C, et al. Mechanism of vehicular periodic operation for optimal fuel economy in free-driving scenarios. Iet Intell Transp Sy, 2015, 9: 306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferramosca A, Limon D, Camacho E F. Economic MPC for a changing economic criterion for linear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2010, 59: 2657–2667

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Fagiano L, Teel A R. Generalized terminal state constraint for model predictive control. Automatica, 2013, 49: 2622–2631

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu J, Zhao Y Q, Ji X W, et al. A modified structure internal model robust control method for the integration of active front steering and direct yaw moment control. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang H, Wang J. Adaptive sliding-mode observer design for a selective catalytic reduction system of ground-vehicle diesel engines. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2016, 21: 2027–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu J B, Wei C, Li X Y. A uniform cross-speed model of end-face seal ring with spiral grooves for wet clutch. Tribology Int, 2013, 62: 8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu J, Liu Y, Wang F, et al. Vehicle active steering control research based on two-DOF robust internal model control. Chin J Mech Eng, 2016, 29: 739–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang J, Choi W, Kim H. Development of a control strategy based on the transmission efficiency with mechanical loss for a dual mode power split-type hybrid electric vehicle. IntJ Automot Tech, 2012, 13: 825–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiara F, Wang J, Patil C B, et al. Development and experimental validation of a control-oriented Diesel engine model for fuel consumption and brake torque predictions. Math Comp Model Dynamical Syst, 2011, 17: 261–277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacob P J, Gu F, Ball A D. Non-parametric models in the monitoring of engine performance and condition: Part 1: Modelling of non-linear engine processes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng, 1999, 213: 73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu X, Murgovski N, Johannesson L, et al. Energy efficiency analysis of a series plug-in hybrid electric bus with different energy management strategies and battery sizes. Appl Energy, 2013, 111: 1001–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Huet F. A review of impedance measurements for determination of the state-of-charge or state-of-health of secondary batteries. J Power Sources, 1998, 70: 59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li L. Control strategy of vehicle dynamic stability control system on low tire-road friction condition. Chin J Mech Eng, 2008, 44: 229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu X, Cao D, Egardt B. Condition monitoring in advanced battery management systems: Moving horizon estimation using a reduced electrochemical model. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2017, 1–1

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zeng X, Yang N, Song D, et al. Multi-factor integrated parametric design of power-split hybrid electric bus. J Clean Prod, 2016, 115: 88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hong S, Kim H, Kim J. Motor control algorithm for an optimal engine operation of power split hybrid electric vehicle. IntJ Automot Tech, 2015, 16: 97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WeiDa Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, Y., Wang, W., Xiang, C. et al. Economic MPC-based transient control for a dual-mode power-split HEV. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 1917–1934 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9128-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9128-4

Keywords

Navigation