Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 60, Issue 5, pp 658–667 | Cite as

An overview of the mission and technical characteristics of Change’4 Lunar Probe

  • PeiJian Ye
  • ZeZhou Sun
  • He Zhang
  • Fei LiEmail author


Change’4 Lunar Probe will softly land on the farside of the Moon for the first time of all mankind and carry out in-situ and rovering exploration. In this paper, the scientific significance and engineering difficulties of Change’4 are introduced and the probe’s general design, including the aspects of landing site selection, relay communication, trajectory design of relay satellite is explained. Besides, four key technologies, namely safe landing strategy on complex terrain, orbit design and control of libration point 2, relay communication on L2, radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) and electric-thermal utilization, as well as how to realize them are also discussed. Finally the prospect of the prominent technological breakthrough of Change’4 is described.


Change’4 farside relay communication libration point South-Pole Aitken Basin RTG 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kring D, Durda D. A global Lunar landing site study to provide the scientific context for exploration of the Moon. LPI-JSC Center for Lunar Science and Exploration, 2012Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jester S, Falcke H. Science with a lunar low-frequency array: From the dark ages of the Universe to nearby exoplanets. New Astron Rev, 2009, 53: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander J K, Kaiser M L, Novaco J C, et al. Scientific instrumentation of the Radio-Astronomy-Explorer-2 satellite. Astronomy Astrophys, 1975, 40: 365–371Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wieczorek M, Mimoun D. FARSIDE A mission to the farside of the Moon. Technical Report. Institut de Physique Globe de Paris, 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun Z Z, Jia Y, Zhang H. Technological advancements and promotion roles of Chang’e-3 lunar probe mission. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 2702–2708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hill K, Parker J, Born G, et al. A Lunar L2 navigation, communication and gravity mission. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. Keystone, Colorado, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farquhar R W. The utilization of halo orbits in advanced lunar operations. NASA Technical Report. Washington, 1971Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zarka P, Bougeret J L, Briand C, et al. Planetary and exoplanetary low frequency radio observations from the Moon. Planet Space Sci, 2012, 74: 156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucey P G, Taylor G J, Hawke B R, et al. FeO and TiO2 concentrations in the South Pole-Aitken basin: Implications for mantle composition and basin formation. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 3701–3708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board. Radioisotope Power Systems Committee Radioisotope Power Systems: An Imperative for Maintaining U.S. Leadership in Space Exploration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Academy of Space TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Spacecraft System EngineeringBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations