Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of axial gap on aerodynamic force and response of shrouded and unshrouded blade

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forced response analysis of a rocket engine turbine blade was conducted by a decoupled fluid-structure interaction procedure. Aerodynamic forces on the rotor blade were obtained using 3D unsteady flow simulations. The resulting aerodynamic forces were interpolated to the finite element (FE) model through surface effect elements prior to conducting forced response calculations. Effects of axial gap on aerodynamic forces were studied. In addition, influence of axial gap on the response of the shrouded blade was compared with that on the response of the unshrouded blade. Results demonstrated that as the axial gap increases, time-averaged pressure on the blade surface changes very little, while the pressure fluctuations decrease significantly. Pressure and aerodynamic forces on the blade surface display periodic variation, and the vane passing frequency component is dominant. Amplitudes of aerodynamic forces decrease with increasing axial gap. Restricted by the shroud, deformation and response of shrouded blade are much lower than those of the unshrouded blade. The response of unshrouded blade shows obvious beat vibration phenomenon, while the response of the shrouded blade does not have this characteristic because the shroud restrains multiple harmonics. Blade response in time domain was converted to frequency domain using fast Fourier transformation (FFT). Results revealed that the axial gap mainly affects the forced harmonic at the vane passing frequency, while the other two harmonics at natural frequency are hardly affected. Amplitudes of the unshrouded blade response decrease as the axial gap increases, while amplitudes of the shrouded blade response change very little in comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao B, Yang C, Chen S, et al. Unsteady flow variability driven by rotor-stator interaction at rotor exit. Chinese J Aeronaut, 2012, 25: 871–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moffatt S, Ning W, Li Y, et al. Blade forced response prediction for industrial gas turbines. J Propul Power, 2005, 21: 707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulisa P, Dano C. Numerical simulation of unsteady blade row interactions induced by passing wakes. Eur J Mech-B/Fluids, 2006, 25: 379–392

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaluvadi V S P, Kalfas A I, Banieghbal M R, et al. Blade-row interaction in a high-pressure turbine. J Propul Power, 2001, 17: 892–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rose M G, Harvey N W. Turbomachinery wakes: Differential work and mixing losses. J Turbomach, 2000, 122: 68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose M, Schüpbach P, Mansour M. The thermodynamics of wake blade interaction in axial flow turbines: Combined experimental and computational study. J Turbomach, 2013, 135: 031015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korakianitis T. Influence of stator-rotor gap on axial-turbine unsteady forcing functions. AIAA J, 1993, 31: 1256–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venable B L, Delaney R A, Busby J A, et al. Influence of vane-blade spacing on transonic turbine stage aerodynamics: Part I—Time-averaged data and analysis. J Turbomach, 1999, 121: 663–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Busby J A, Davis R L, Dorney D J, et al. Influence of vane-blade spacing on transonic turbine stage aerodynamics: Part II—Time-resolved data and analysis. J Turbomach, 1999, 121: 673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang D, Tavoularis S. Effect of the axial spacing between vanes and blades on a transonic gas turbine performance and blade loading. Int J Turbo Jet Eng, 2013, 30: 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park J Y, Choi M S, Baek J H. Effects of axial gap on unsteady secondary flow in one-stage axial turbine. Int J Turbo Jet Engines, 2003, 20: 315–334

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaetani P, Persico G, Osnaghi C. Effects of axial gap on the vane-rotor interaction in a low aspect ratio turbine stage. J Propul Power, 2010, 26: 325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kikuchi M, Funazaki K, Yamada K, et al. Detailed studies on aerodynamic performances and unsteady flow behaviors of a single turbine stage with variable rotor-stator axial gap. Int J Gas Turb, Propul Power Syst, 2008, 2: 30–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. Restemeier M, Jeschke P, Guendogdu Y, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of the effect of variable blade row spacing in a subsonic axial turbine. J Turbomach, 2013, 135: 021031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cizmas P G A, Hoenninger C R, Chen S, et al. Influence of inter-row gap value on turbine losses. Int J Rotating Mach, 2001, 7: 335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang E, Leroy G, Philit M E, et al. Unsteady analysis of inter-rows stator-rotor spacing effects on a transonic, low-aspect ratio turbine. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Canada, 2015

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Li D Y, Gong R Z, Wang H J, et al. Dynamic analysis on pressure fluctuation in vaneless region of a pump turbine. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 813–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo L, Liu J T, Wang L Q, et al. Pressure fluctuation propagation of a pump turbine at pump mode under low head condition. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Misek T, Tetiva A, Prchlik L, et al. Prediction of high cycle fatigue life of steam turbine blading based on unsteady CFD and FEM forced response calculation. In: Proceedings of GT2007 ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea and Air. Montreal, Canada, 2007

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Suder K L. Experimental investigation of the flow field in a transonic, axial flow compressor with respect to the development of blockage and loss. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Cleveland, Ohio: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ameri A A. NASA rotor 37 CFD code validation. In: 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Orlando, Florida, 2009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jue Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Li, J., Cai, G. et al. Effects of axial gap on aerodynamic force and response of shrouded and unshrouded blade. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 491–500 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-9010-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-9010-y

Keywords

Navigation