Abstract
The geometric configuration of the solid fuel is a key parameter affecting the fuel regression rate in hybrid rocket motors. In this paper, a semi-empirical regression rate model is developed to investigate the geometric effect on the fuel regression rate by incorporating the hydraulic diameter into the classical model. The semi-empirical model indicates that the fuel regression rate decreases with increasing hydraulic diameter and is proportional to d -0.2 h when convective heat transfer is dominant. Then a numerical model considering turbulence, combustion, solid fuel pyrolysis, and a solid–gas coupling model is established to further investigate the geometric effect. Eight motors with different solid fuel grains are simulated, and four methods of scaling the regression rate between different solid fuel grains are compared. The results indicate that the solid fuel regression rates are approximate the same when the hydraulic diameters are equal. The numerical results verify the accuracy of the semi-empirical model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chiaverini M J, Kuo K K. Fundamentals of hybrid rocket combustion and propulsion. Prog Astronautics Aeronautics. AIAA, 2007
Davydenko N A, Gollender R G, Gubertov A M, et al. Hybrid rocket engines: The benefits and prospects. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2007, 1: 55–60
Martin F, Chapelle A, Orlandi O, et al. Hybrid propulsion systems for future space applications. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Nashville, TN: AIAA 2010-6633, 2010
Marxman G A. Boundary-Layer Combustion in Propulsion. Eleventh Symposium (International) on Combustion. Pittsburgh, PA: Combustion Inst., 1966
Marxman G A, Wooldridge C E, Muzzy R J. Fundamentals of Hybrid Boundary Layer Combustion. Heterogeneous Combustion. Heterogeneous Combustion. New York: Academic Press, 1964. 485–521
Marxman G A, Gilbert M. Turbulent boundary layer combustion in the hybrid rocket. In: Ninth International Symposium on Combustion. Ninth International Symposium on Combustion. New York: Academic Press, 1963. 371–383
Estey P N, Altman D, Mcfarlane J S. An evaluation of scaling effects for hybrid rocket motors. AIAA Paper 91-2517, 1991
Venkateswaran S, Merkle C L. Size scale-up in hybrid rocket motors. In: 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV: AIAA, 1996
Wooldridge C E, Muzzy R J. Internal ballistic considerations in hybrid rocket design. J Spacecraft Rockets, 1967, 2: 255–262
Chiaverini M J, Kuo K K, Peretz A, et al. Regression-rate and heat-transfer correlations for hybrid rocket combustion. J Propul Power, 2001, 1: 99–110
Chiaverini M J, Serin N, Johnson D K, et al. Regression rate behavior of hybrid rocket solid fuels. J Propul Power, 2000, 1: 125–132
Evans B, Favorito N A, Kuo K K. Study of Solid fuel burning-rate enhancement behavior in an X-Ray translucent hybrid rocket motor. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Tucson, Arizona: AIAA, 2005
George P, Krishnan S, Varkey P M, et al. Fuel regression rate in hydroxyl- terminated-polybutadiene/gaseous-oxygen hybrid rocket motors. J Propul Power, 2001, 1: 35–42
Carmicino C, Sorge A R. Role of injection in hybrid rockets regression rate behavior. J Propul Power, 2005, 4: 606–612
Gany A. Scale Effects in hybrid motors under similarity conditions. In: 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exihibit, Lake Buena Vista: 1996
Swami R D, Gany A. Analysis and testing of similarity and scale effects in hybrid rocket motors. Acta Astronaut, 2003, 8: 619–628
Zilliac G, Karabeyoglu M A. Hybrid rocket fuel regression rate data and modeling. In: Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, California: 2006
Li X T, Tian H, Cai G B. Numerical analysis of fuel regression rate distribution characteristics in hybrid rocket motors with different fuel types. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 7: 1807–1817
Guthrie D M, Wolf R S. Non-acoustic combustion instability in hybrid rocket motors. In: 26th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Orlando, FL: AIAA, 1990
Estey P N, Mcfarlane J S, Kniffen R K, et al. Large hybird eocket testing results. In: AIAA Space Programs and Technologies Conference, Huntsville, AL: AIAA 93-4279, 1993
Mcfarlane J S, Saville M P, Nunez S C. Testing of a 10000 Lbf thrust hybrid rocket motor with a foil bearing lox turbopump. In: 31st AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, San Diego, CA: AIAA 95-2941, 1995
Story G, Zoladz T, Abel T. Hybrid propulsion demonstration program 250 K hybrid motor. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama: AIAA 2003-5198, 2003
Park O Y, Bryant C T, Carpenter R L. Performance analyses of hpdp 250 K hybrids. In: 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Huntsviile, Alabama: AIAA 2000-3544, 2000
Yee S M, Shaeffer C W. Fuel regression characteristics in two distinct hybrid motor configuration. AIAA Paper 97-3079, 1997
Dornheim M A. Hybrid matched to spaceship goals. Aviation Week Space Tech, 2003, 158: 69–77
Li J H, Luo Q. The hybrid sounding rocket of “Beihang-2”. In: 60th International Astronautical Congress, Korea: 2008
Zeng P, Li X T, Li J H. Development of the variable thrust hybrid sounding rocket: Beihang-3. In: 63rd International Astronautical Congress, Italy: 2013
Cai G B, Zeng P, Tian H, et al. Scale effect of fuel regression rate in hybrid rocket motor. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2013, 24: 141–146
Chiaverini M J, Harting G C, Kuo K K. Pyrolysis behavior of hybrid- rocket solid fuels under rapid heating conditions. J Propul Power, 1999, 15: 888–895
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, P. et al. Geometric effects of fuel regression rate in hybrid rocket motors. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59, 807–813 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-6034-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-6034-1