Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 839–851 | Cite as

Design for structural flexibility using connected morphable components based topology optimization

  • JiaDong Deng
  • Wei ChenEmail author


In topology optimization of structures considering flexibility, degenerated optimal solutions, such as hinges, gray areas and disconnected structures may appear. In this paper, built upon the newly developed morphable component based topology optimization approach, a novel representation using connected morphable components (CMC) and a linkage scheme are proposed to prevent degenerating designs and to ensure structure integrity. A lower bound condition of the thickness of each component is also incorporated to completely remove the smallest components in an optimal configuration. Designs of flexible structures, such as compliant mechanism design, maximum compliance structure design, and design of low-frequency resonating micro devices are studied to validate the proposed methodology. Our work demonstrates that the new methodology can successfully prevent degeneration solutions and possesses other advantages, such as minimum member size control in topology optimization of flexible structures.


topology optimization connected component degenerated designs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Guo X, Cheng G D. Recent development in structural design and optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2010; 26: 807–823MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidiscip O, 2013; 48: 1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Method Appl M, 1988; 71: 197–224MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendsøe M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optimiz, 1989; 1: 193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou M, Rozvany G. The COC algorithm, Part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Method Appl M, 1991; 89: 309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rozvany G, Zhou M, Birker T. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optimiz, 1992; 4: 250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech, 1999; 69: 635–654CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2003zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rogers J A, Someya T, Huang Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science, 2010; 327: 1603–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan J A, Yeo W H, Su Y W, et al. Fractal design concepts for stretchable electronics. Nature Communications, 2014. 5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suo Z. Mechanics of stretchable electronics and soft machines. MRS Bull, 2012; 37: 218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deng J D, Rorschach K, Baker E, et al. Topology optimization and fabrication of low frequency vibration energy harvesting microdevices. Smart Mater Struct, 2015, 24: 025005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedersen N L. Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip O, 2000; 20: 2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Du J B, Olhoff N. Topological design of freely vibrating continuum structures for maximum values of simple and multiple eigenfrequencies and frequency gaps. Struct Multidiscip O, 2007; 34: 91–110MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma Z D, Kikuchi N, Hagiwara I. Structural topology and shape optimization for a frequency response problem. Comput Mech, 1993; 13: 157–174MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma Z D, Kikuchi N, Cheng H C. Topological design for vibrating structures. Comput Method Appl M, 1995; 121: 259–280MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Min S, Kikuchi N, Park Y C, et al. Optimal topology design of structures under dynamic loads. Struct Optimiz, 1999; 17: 208–218Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tai K, Chee T H. Design of structures and compliant mechanisms by evolutionary optimization of morphological representations of topology. J Mech Design, 2000. 122: 560–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tai K, Cui G Y, Ray T. Design synthesis of path generating compliant mechanisms by evolutionary optimization of topology and shape. J Mech Design, 2002; 124: 492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou S W, Li Q. Microstructural design of connective base cells for functionally graded materials. Mater Lett, 2008; 62: 4022–4024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friis K S, Sigmund O. Robust topology design of periodic grating surfaces. J Opt Soc Am B, 2012; 29: 2935–2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andreasen C S, Andreassen E, Jensen J S, et al. On the realization of the bulk modulus bounds for two-phase viscoelastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids, 2014; 63: 228–241MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nishiwaki S, Saitou K, Min S, et al. Topological design considering flexibility under periodic loads. Struct Multidiscip O, 2000; 19: 4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tcherniak D. Topology optimization of resonating structures using SIMP method. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 2002; 54: 1605–1622CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsai T D, Cheng C C. Structural design for desired eigenfrequencies and mode shapes using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip O, 2013; 47: 673–686MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tai K, Chee T. Design of structures and compliant mechanisms by evolutionary optimization of morphological representations of topology. J Mech Design, 2000; 122: 560–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tai K, Prasad J. Target-matching test problem for multiobjective topology optimization using genetic algorithms. Struct Multidiscip O, 2007; 34: 333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nishiwaki S, Silva E, Saitou K, et al. Topology optimization of actuators using structural flexibility. In: Proceedings of 3rd WCSMO’99, Buffalo, 1999. 4–6Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou S W, Li Q. Design of graded two-phase microstructures for tailored elasticity gradients. J Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 5157–5167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen S, Wang M Y, Liu A Q. Shape feature control in structural topology optimization. Comput Aided Design, 2008; 40: 951–962MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang F, Lazarov B S, Sigmund O. On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip O, 2011; 43: 767–784CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Allaire G, Jouve F, Michailidis G. Thickness control in structural optimization via a level set method. 2014. https://hal.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-00985000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W. Explicit feature control in structural topology optimization via level set method. Comput Method Appl M, 2014; 272: 354–378MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang W, Zhong W, Guo X. An explicit length scale control approach in SIMP-based topology optimization. Comput Method Appl M, 2014; 282: 71–86MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W. Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically—A new moving morphable components based framework. J Appl Mech, 2014, 81: 081009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhu J, Zhang W, Beckers P. Integrated layout design of multi-component system. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 2009; 78: 631–651CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bell B, Norato J, Tortorelli D. A geometry projection method for continuum-based topology optimization of structures. In: 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, 2012Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Norato J, Bell B, Tortorelli D. A geometry projection method for continuum-based topology optimization with discrete elements. Comput Method Appl M, 2015; 293: 306–327MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wei P, Wang M Y, Xing X. A study on X-FEM in continuum structural optimization using a level set model. Comput Aided Design, 2010; 42: 708–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kreissl S, Maute K. Levelset based fluid topology optimization using the extended finite element method. Struct Multidiscip O, 2012; 46: 311–326MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Belytschko T, Liu W K, Moran B, et al. Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes—A new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 1987; 24: 359–373MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Svanberg K. A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch. In: Proceedings of the First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Goslar, Germany, 1995Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wen X. High order numerical methods to two dimensional delta function integrals in level set methods. J Comput Phys, 2009; 228: 4273–4290MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wen X. High order numerical methods to three dimensional delta function integrals in level set methods. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2010; 32: 1288–1309MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations