Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters inversion of high central core rockfill dams based on a novel genetic algorithm

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parameters identification of rockfill materials is a crucial issue for high rockfill dams. Because of the scale effect, random sampling and sample disturbance, it is difficult to obtain the actual mechanical properties of rockfill from laboratory tests. Parameters inversion based on in situ monitoring data has been proven to be an efficient method for identifying the exact parameters of the rockfill. In this paper, we propose a modified genetic algorithm to solve the high-dimension multimodal and nonlinear optimal parameters inversion problem. A novel crossover operator based on the sum of differences in gene fragments (SoDX) is proposed, inspired by the cloning of superior genes in genetic engineering. The crossover points are selected according to the difference in the gene fragments, defining the adaptive length. The crossover operator increases the speed and accuracy of algorithm convergence by reducing the inbreeding and enhancing the global search capability of the genetic algorithm. This algorithm is compared with two existing crossover operators. The modified genetic algorithm is then used in combination with radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) to perform the parameters back analysis of a high central earth core rockfill dam. The settlements simulated using the identified parameters show good agreement with the monitoring data, illustrating that the back analysis is reasonable and accurate. The proposed genetic algorithm has considerable superiority for nonlinear multimodal parameter identification problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wei Z, Xiaolin C, Chuangbing Z, et al. Creep analysis of high concrete- faced rockfill dam. Int J Numer Meth Bio, 2010, 11: 1477–1492

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hua J, Zhou W, Chang X, et al. Study of scale effect on stress and deformation of rockfill. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2010, 2: 328–335

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holland J H. Adaptation in natural and artificial system: An introduction with application to biology, control and artificial intelligence. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Michigan: University of Michigan, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holland J H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Laarhoven P J, Aarts E H. Simulated Annealing. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, 1987

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Aarts E, Korst J. Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines: A Stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1988

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowsland K A, Thompson J M. Simulated Annealing. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. 1623–1655

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shen H, Zhou J, Peng Q, et al. Multi-objective interplanetary trajectory optimization combining low-thrust propulsion and gravity-assist maneuvers. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 841–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Storn R, Price K. Differential Evolution-A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization Over Continuous Spaces. Berkeley: ICSI, 1995

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera F, Lozano M, Verdegay J L. Fuzzy connectives based crossover operators to model genetic algorithms population diversity. Fuzzy Set Syst, 1997, 1: 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim, 1997, 4: 341–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Eberhart R C, Kennedy J. A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm theory. New York: Nagoya, 1995. 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy J. Particle Swarm Optimization. Boston: Springer, 2010. 760–766

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma G, Zhou W, Chang X. A novel particle swarm optimization algorithm based on particle migration. Appl Math Comput, 2012, 11: 6620–6626

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang S, Ou J. BP-PSO-based intelligent case retrieval method for high-rise structural form selection. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 940–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Jong K A. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Michigan: University of Michigan, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg D E, Holland J H. Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn, 1988, 2: 95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg D E. Real-coded genetic algorithms, virtual alphabets, and Blocking. Urbana, 1990, 51: 61801

    Google Scholar 

  19. Janikow C Z, Michalewicz Z. An experimental comparison of binary and floating point representations in genetic algorithms. ICGA, 1991. 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michalewicz Z, Logan T, Swaminathan S. Evolutionary Operators for Continuous Convex Parameter Spaces. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, 1994. 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radcliffe N J. Equivalence class analysis of genetic algorithms. Complex Syst, 1991, 2: 183–205

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ono I, Kita H, Kobayashi S. A real-coded genetic algorithm using the unimodal normal distribution crossover. Advances in evolutionary computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. 213–237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright A H. Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. Found Genet Algorithm, 1991, 1: 205–218

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsutsui S, Yamamura M, Higuchi T. Multi-parent recombination with simplex crossover in real coded genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Florida, 1999. 657–664

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deb K, Anand A, Joshi D. A computationally efficient evolutionary algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Evol Comput, 2002, 4: 371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Deep K, Thakur M. A new crossover operator for real coded genetic algorithms. Appl Math Comput, 2007, 1: 895–911

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Thakur M. A new genetic algorithm for global optimization of multimodal continuous functions. J Comput Sci-Neth, 2014, 2: 298–311

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Elsayed S M, Sarker R A, Essam D L. A new genetic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intel, 2014, 27: 57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Q, Liu B, Zhang Q, et al. Problem definition and evaluation criteria for CEC 2015 special session and competition on bound constrained single-objective computationally expensive numerical optimization. https://mysites.ntu.edu.sg

  30. Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Strength and deformation of rockfill material based on large-scale triaxial compression tests. I: Influences of density and pressure. J Geotech Geoenviron, 2014, 12: 4014070

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Strength and deformation of rockfill material based on large-scale triaxial compression tests. II: Influence of particle breakage. J Geotech Geoenviron, 2014, 12: 4014071

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Bounding surface model for rockfill materials dependent on density and pressure under triaxial stress conditions. J Eng Mech, 2013, 4: 4014002

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xiao Y, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Bounding surface plasticity model incorporating the state pressure index for rockfill materials. J Eng Mech, 2014, 11: 4014087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Duncan J, Chang C. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found, 1970, 5: 1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li G, Ni Z, Fu H, et al. Experimental studies on rheological behaviors for rockfills in concrete faced rockfill dam. Chin J Rock Soli Mech, 2004, 11: 1712–1716

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tomlin A S. The use of global uncertainty methods for the evaluation of combustion mechanisms. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2006. 10–11: 1219–1231

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, W., Li, S., Ma, G. et al. Parameters inversion of high central core rockfill dams based on a novel genetic algorithm. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59, 783–794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-6017-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-6017-2

Keywords

Navigation