Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-basis reconstruction techniques for tomographic PIV

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an inverse problem, particle reconstruction in tomographic particle image velocimetry attempts to solve a large-scale underdetermined linear system using an optimization technique. The most popular approach, the multiplicative algebraic reconstruction technique (MART), uses entropy as an objective function in the optimization. All available MART-based methods are focused on improving the efficiency and accuracy of particle reconstruction. However, those methods do not perform very well on dealing with ghost particles in highly seeded measurements. In this report, a new technique called dual-basis pursuit (DBP), which is based on the basis pursuit technique, is proposed for tomographic particle reconstruction. A template basis is introduced as a priori knowledge of a particle intensity distribution combined with a correcting basis to enable a full span of the solution space of the underdetermined linear system. A numerical assessment test with 2D synthetic images indicated that the DBP technique is superior to MART method, can completely recover a particle field when the number of particles per pixel (ppp) is less than 0.15, and can maintain a quality factor Q of above 0.8 for ppp up to 0.30. Unfortunately, the DBP method is difficult to utilize in 3D applications due to the cost of its excessive memory usage. Therefore, a dual-basis MART was designed that performed better than the traditional MART and can potentially be utilized for 3D applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elsinga G E, Scarano F, Wieneke B, et al. Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids, 2006, 41: 933–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scarano F. Tomographic PIV: Principles and practice. Meas Sci Tech, 2013, 24: 012001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Herman G T, Lent A. Iterative reconstruction algorithms. Comput Biol Med, 1976, 6: 273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Natterer F. Numerical methods in tomography. Acta Numer, 1999, 8: 107–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon R, Bender R, Herman G T. Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography. J Theor Biol, 1970, 29: 471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson C, Soria J. An efficient simultaneous reconstruction technique for tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids, 2009, 47: 553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao Q, Wang H P, Shen G X. Review on development of volumetric particle image velocimetry. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 4541–4556

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Elsinga G, Westerweel J, Scarano F, et al. On the velocity of ghost particles and the bias errors in Tomographic-PIV. Exp Fluids, 2011, 50: 825–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Michaelis D, Novara M, Scarano F, et al. Comparison of volume reconstruction techniques at different particle densities. In: 15th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petra S, Schnörr C, Schröder A, et al. Tomographic image reconstruction in experimental fluid dynamics: Synopsis and problems. In: Ion S, Marinoschi G, Popa C, eds. Mathematical Modelling of Environmental and Life Sciences Problems, Bucuresti: Ed. Acad Romane, 2007. 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westerweel J, Elsinga G E, Adrian R J. Particle image velocimetry for complex and turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2013, 45: 409–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Worth N A, Nickels T B. Acceleration of Tomo-PIV by estimating the initial volume intensity distribution. Exp Fluids, 2008, 45: 847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE T Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Petra S, Schnörr C. TomoPIV meets compressed sensing. In: ICNAAM 2010: International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Athens, Greece, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petra S, Schröder A, Schnörr C. 3D tomography from few projections in experimental fluid dynamics. Imag Meas Meth Flow Anal, 2009. 63–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamarche F, Leroy C. Evaluation of the volume of intersection of a sphere with a cylinder by elliptic integrals. Comput Phys Commun, 1990, 59: 359–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A, et al. Non-uniform optical transfer functions in particle imaging: calibration and application to tomographic reconstruction. Meas Sci Tech, 2013, 24: 024009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Champagnat F, Cornic P, Cheminet A, et al. Tomographic PIV: particles vs blobs. In: 10th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Delft, The Netherlands, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  19. Discetti S, Natale A, Astarita T. Spatial filtering improved tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids, 2013, 54: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sebastian G, Daniel S, Andreas S, et al. Recasting Tomo-PIV reconstruction as constrained and L1-regularized non-linear least squares problem. In: 15th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barbu I, Herzet C, Memin E. Sparse models and pursuit algorithms for piv tomography. In: Forum on Recent Developments in Volume Reconstruction Techniques Applied to 3D Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mallat S G, Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE T Signal Proces, 1993, 41: 3397–3415

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen S S, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J Sci Comput, 1998, 20: 33–61

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cornic P, Champagnat F, Cheminet A, et al. Computationally efficient sparse algorithms for tomographic PIV Reconstruction. In: 10th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Delft, The Netherlands, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adrian R J, Westerweel J. Particle Image Velocimetry. 2nd ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Z., Gao, Q., Wang, H. et al. Dual-basis reconstruction techniques for tomographic PIV. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 1963–1970 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5909-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5909-x

Keywords

Navigation