Skip to main content
Log in

Tempospacial energy-saving effect-based diagnosis in large coal-fired power units: Energy-saving benchmark state

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The energy-saving analytics of coal-fired power units in China is confronting new challenges especially with even more complicated system structure, higher working medium parameters, time-dependent varying operation conditions and boundaries such as load rate, coal quality, ambient temperature and humidity. Compared with the traditional optimization of specific operating parameters, the idea of the energy-consumption benchmark state was proposed. The equivalent specific fuel consumption (ESFC) analytics was introduced to determine the energy-consumption benchmark state, with the minimum ESFC under varying operation boundaries. Models for the energy-consumption benchmark state were established, and the endogenous additional specific consumption (ASFC) and exogenous ASFC were calculated. By comparing the benchmark state with the actual state, the energy-saving tempospacial effect can be quantified. As a case study, the energy consumption model of a 1000 MW ultra supercritical power unit was built. The results show that system energy consumption can be mainly reduced by improving the performance of turbine subsystem. This nearly doubles the resultant by improving the boiler system. The energy saving effect of each component increases with the decrease of load and has a greater influence under a lower load rate. The heat and mass transfer process takes priority in energy saving diagnosis of related components and processes. This makes great reference for the design and operation optimization of coal-fired power units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. China Electricity Council. Annual Devel Opment Report of China’s Power Industry. Beijing: China Market Press, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valero A, Correas L, Zaleta A, et al. On the thermoeconomic approach to the diagnosis of energy system malfunctions part 1: The TADEUS problem. Energy, 2004, 29: 1875–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Valero A, Correas L, Zaleta A, et al. On the thermoeconomic approach to the diagnosis of energy system malfunctions part 2: Malfunction definitions and assessment. Energy, 2004, 29: 1889–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang X L, Liu P, Li Z. Data reconciliation and gross error detection for operational data in power plants. Energy, 2014, 75: 14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Si F Q, Gu H, Ye Y L, et al. Online unit load economic dispatch based on chaotic-particle swarm optimization algorithm (in Chinese). P CSEE, 2011, 31: 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen D G, Zhang W X. The random set expression of pawlak rough set model and its composition (in Chinese). Comput Sci, 2002, 29: 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang F, Wang P H. Arithmetic research of local quantitative modificatory model on equivalent enthalpy drop (in Chinese). Turb Techno, 2008, 50: 122–125

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen H P, Zhang S F, Zhang C F, et al. Coal-fired power plant thermal system heat unit matrix analysis method (in Chinese). Power Eng, 1992, 19: 38–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan S L, Hu S G, Xu H, et al. Research on the unified physical model and mathematic model of heat-economic analysis for the coal-fired power unit (in Chinese). P CSEE, 2008, 28:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Cao L H, Lin W B. Improvements on the equivalent enthalpy drop method (in Chinese). P CSEE, 2004, 24: 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C F, Zhang S X, Cui Y H, et al. Thermo-economy state equation of modern power system (in Chinese). J Eng Thermophys, 2001, 22: 665–667

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uson S, Valero A. Thermoeconomic diagnosis for improving the operation of energy intensive systems: Comparison of methods. Appl Energ, 2011, 88: 699–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal Design and Optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song Z P. The theory and implementation of energy specific fuel consumption (in Chinese). P CSEE, 1992, 12: 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guo J L, Zhang S F, Song Z P, et al. A matrix method for thermal system analysis in a power plant (in Chinese). P CSEE, 2004, 24: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lazzaretto A, Tsatsaronis G. Speco: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy, 2006, 31: 1257–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsatsaronis G. Design optimization using exergoeconomics. Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Y P, Yang K. Theory of energy conservation potential diagnosis for a coal-fired unit and its application (in Chinese). P CSEE, 1998, 18: 131–134

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chang H, Chuang S C. Process analysis using the concept of intrinsic and extrinsic exergy losses. Energy, 2003, 28: 1203–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang H, Li J W. A new exergy method for process analysis and optimization. Chem Eng Sci, 2005, 60: 2771–2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Y P, Wang L G, Dong C Q, et al. Comprehensive exergy-based evaluation and parametric study of a coal-fired ultra-supercritical power plant. Appl Energ, 2013, 112: 1087–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valero A, Lerch F, Serra L, et al. Structural theory and thermoeconomic diagnosis. Part II: Application to an actual power plant. Energ Convers Manage, 2002, 43: 1519–1535

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toffolo A, Lazzaretto A. A new thermoeconomic method for the location of causes of malfunctions in energy systems. J Energ Resour-ASME, 2006, 129, 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song Z P. A case study of unit consumption analysis (in Chinese). J Eng Thermophys, 1996, 17: 397–399

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y P, Guo X Y, Wang N L. Power generation from pulverized coal in China. Energy, 2010, 35: 4336–4348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang N L, Yang Z P, Wu Y. Energy-saving evaluation and system optimization for large coal-fired power units (in Chinese). J Ncepu, 2010, 37: 55–58

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xing Z Z. Technology research on depth peak load cycling of thermal power generator units (in Chinese). Dissertation of Master Degree. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li P Y. The lowest stable-combustion research of a 1000 MW ultra supercritical boiler (in Chinese). Guangdong Sci Tech, 2013, 22: 40–41

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tang P, Li Y Y, Li G T, et al. The unit selection of 600 MW pithead power plant (in Chinese). Boiler Tech, 2013, 44: 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yin X, Zheng J F, He B S, et al. Effect of temperature and volatile-char interactions on ratio of volatile-NO and char-NO during coal combustion (in Chinese). Boiler Tech, 2013, 44: 61–63

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tian J J. Circulating water system optimization analysis during the operation of steam turbine and condenser (in Chinese). Sci Tech Vision, 2013, 3: 60–61

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hu F M, Xi J B. The operation optimization of the condenser circulating water in power plant (in Chinese). Yunnan Electric Power, 2013, 41: 84–86

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cang G C, Wu H J, Wang L, et al. The study of method for boiler optimized operation oxygen (in Chinese). Boiler Tech, 2008, 39: 622–624

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang N L, Yang Y P, Yang Z P, et al. Energy-consumption benchmark diagnosis of thermal power units under varying operation boundary (in Chinese). P CSEE, 2013, 33: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fu P, Wang N L, Yang Y P, et al. The mechanism of energyconsumption benchmark in coal-fired units with varying boundary (in Chinese). J Eng Thermophys, 2015, 36: 468–473

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tsatsaronis G, Morosuk T. A general exergy-based method for combining a cost analysis with an environmental impact analysis. Part I: Theoretical development. In: ASME Conference Proceedings, 2008, 8: 453–462

    Google Scholar 

  37. Toffolo A, Lazzaretto A. On the thermoeconomic approach to the diagnosis of energy system malfunctions. Indicators to diagnose malfunctions: Application of a new indicator for the location of causes. Int J Thermodyn, 2004, 7: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YongPing Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, P., Wang, N., Yang, Y. et al. Tempospacial energy-saving effect-based diagnosis in large coal-fired power units: Energy-saving benchmark state. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 2025–2037 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5879-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5879-z

Keywords

Navigation