Skip to main content

Transparent soft PDMS eggshell

Abstract

In vivo 3D fluorescent image remains a technological barrier for biologists and clinical scientists although green fluorescent protein (GFP) imaging has long been performed rather well at cellular level. Meanwhile, robust enough portable devices are also challenging lab-on-a-chip advocators who wish their designs to be nurtured by the end users. This work is dedicated to propose a conceptually innovated transparent soft PDMS avian eggshell to directly tackle the above two goals. Here, an “egg-on-a-chip” scheme is originally developed and demonstrated by a newly developed PDMS “soft” process method. Unlike its ancestor-the conventional “lab-on-a-chip” (LOC) which is basically chemically based, the current “egg-on-a-chip”, intrinsically inherited with biological natures, opens a way to integrate biological parts or whole system in a miniature sized device. Such biomimics system contains much condensed environmental evolutional tensor inside than those of the existing LOC compacted with artificial components which however are quite difficult to incorporate various life factors inside. Owning unique advantages, a series of transparent PDMS whole “eggshells” have been fabricated and applied to culture avian embryos up to 17.5 days and chimeric eggshells were engineered on normal eggs. In addition, X-stage embryos were successfully initiated in such system and pre-chorioallantoic membrane was observed. Further, limitation of the present process was interpreted and potential approach to improve it was suggested. With both high optical transparency and engineering subtlety fully integrated together, the present method not only provides an ideal transparent imaging platform for studying functional embryo development including life mystery, but also promises a future strategy for “lab-on-an-egg” technology which may be important in a wide variety of either fundamental or practical areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Karumuri S R, Srinivas Y, Sekhar J V, et al. Review on break through MEMS Technology. Arch Phy Res, 2011, 4: 158–165

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tantra R, Jarman J. μTAS (micro total analysis systems) for the high-throughput measurement of nanomaterial solubility. J Phys Conf Series, 2013, 429: 012011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stavis S M. A glowing future for lab on a chip testing standards. Lab Chip, 2012, 12: 3008–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daw R, Finkelstein J. Lab on a chip. Nature, 2006, 442, 7101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bélanger M C, Marois Y. Hemocompatibility, biocompatibility, inflammatory and in vivo studies of primary reference materials low-density polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane: A review. J Biomed Mater Res, 2001, 58: 467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Piruska A, Nikcevic I, Lee S H, et al. The autofluorescence of plastic materials and chips measured under laser irradiation. J Lab Chip, 2005, 5: 1348–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Romanowsky M B, Heymann M, Abate A R, et al. Functional patterning of PDMS microfluidic devices using integrated chemo-masks. Lab Chip, 2010, 10: 1521–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sollier E, Murray C, Maoddi P, et al. Rapid prototyping polymers for microfluidic devices and high pressure injections. Lab Chip, 2011, 11: 3752–3765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Merkel T C, Bondar V I, Nagai K, et al. Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly (dimethylsiloxane). J Polym Sci B Polym Phys, 2000, 38: 415–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou J W, Ellis A V, Voelcker N H. Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis, 2010, 31: 2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Au A K, Lai H, Utela B R, et al. Microvalves and micropumps for bioMEMS. Micromachines, 2011, 2: 179–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi J S, Piao Y, Seo T S. Fabrication of a circular PDMS microchannel for constructing a three-dimensional endothelial cell layer. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2013, 36: 1871–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huh D, Leslie D C, Matthews B D, et al. A human disease model of drug toxicity-induced pulmonary edema in a lung-on-a-chip microdevice. Sci Transl Med, 2012, 4: 147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grosberg A, Alford P W, McCain M L, et al. Ensembles of engi neered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: Heart on a chip. Lab Chip, 2011, 11: 4165–4173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H J, Huh D, Hamiltona G, et al. Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip, 2012, 12: 2165–2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S A, No D Y, Kang E, et al. Spheroid-based three-dimensional liver-on-a-chip to investigate hepatocyte-hepatic stellate cell interactions and flow effects. Lab Chip, 2013, 13: 3529–3537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang K J, Suh K Y. A multi-layer microfluidic device for efficient culture and analysis of renal tubular cells. Lab Chip, 2010, 10: 36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Torisawa Y S, Spina C S, Collins J J, et al. Bone marrow-on-a-chip. In: 16th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 2012. 563–565

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang Y, Williams J C, Johnson S M. Brain slice on a chip: Opportunities and challenges of applying microfluidic technology to intact tissues. Lab Chip, 2012, 12: 2103–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prabhakarpandian B, Shen M C, Nichols J B, et al. SyM-BBB: A microfluidic blood brain barrier model. Lab Chip, 2013, 6: 1093–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leslie D C, Domansky K, Hamilton G A, et al. Aerosol drug delivery for lung on a chip. In: 15th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, 2011. 97–99

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ataç B, Wagner I, Horland R, et al. Skin and hair on-a-chip: In vitro skin models versus ex vivo tissue maintenance with dynamic perfusion. Lab Chip, 2013, 13: 3555–3561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker M. A living system on a chip. Nature, 2011, 471: 661–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williamson A, Singh S, Fernekorn U, et al. The future of the patient-specific body-on-a-chip. Lab Chip, 2013, 13: 3471–3480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marx U, Walles H, Hoffmann S, et al. ‘Human-on-a-chip’ developments: A translational cutting edge alternative to systemic safety assessment and efficiency evaluation of substances in laboratory animals and man? ATLA, 2012, 40: 235–257

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burggren W W. What is the purpose of the embryonic heart beat? or How facts can ultimately prevail over physiological dogma. Physiol Biochem Zool, 2004, 77: 333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hopwood N. Producing development: The anatomy of human embryos and the norms of Wilhelm His. Bull Hist Med, 2000, 74: 29–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White R M, Sessa A, Burke C, et al. Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 2: 183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levine A J, Munoz-Sanjuan I, Bell E, et al. Fluorescent labeling of endothelial cells allows in vivo, continuous characterization of the vascular development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol, 2003, 254: 50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bach E A, Ekas L A, Ayala-Camargo A, et al. GFP reporters detect the activation of the drosophila JAK/STAT pathway in vivo. Gene Exp Pattern, 2007, 7: 323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lim E, Modi K D, Kim J. In vivo bioluminescent imaging of mammary tumors using IVIS spectrum. JoVE, 2009, 26: 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Allison R R, Mota H C, Sibata C H. Clinical PD/PDT in north America: An historical review. Photodiag Photodyn Therapy, 2004, 1: 263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ragan T, Kadiri L R, Venkataraju K U, et al. Serial two-photon tomography for automated ex vivo mouse brain imaging. Nat Methods, 2012, 9: 255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tufan A C, Akdogan I, Adiguzel E. Shell-less culture of the chick embryo as a model system in the study of developmental neurobiology. Neuroanatomy, 2004, 3: 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dohle D S, Pasa S D, Gustmann S, et al. Chick ex ovo culture and ex ovo CAM assay: How it really works. J Visualized Exp, 2009, 33: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yalcin H C, Shekhar A, Rane A A, et al. An ex-ovo chicken embryo culture system suitable for imaging and microsurgery applications. JoVE, 2010, 44: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schomann T, Qunneis F, Widera D, et al. Improved method for ex ovo-cultivation of developing chicken embryos for human stem cell Xenografts. Stem Cells Int, 2013, 2013: 960958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chapman S C, Collignon J, Schoenwolf G C, et al. Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper Carrier. Dev Biol, 2001, 220: 284–289

    Google Scholar 

  39. Toepke M W, Beebe D J. PDMS absorption of small molecules and consequences in microfluidic applications. Lab Chip, 2006, 6: 1484–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Keller R. Cell migration during gastrulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2005, 17: 533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dormann D, Weijer C J. Imaging of cell migration. EMBO J, 2006, 25: 3480–3493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kulesa P M, Fraser S E. In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches. Development, 2000, 127: 1161–1172

    Google Scholar 

  43. Griswold S L, Lwigale P Y. Analysis of neural crest migration and differentiation by cross-species transplantation. JoVE, 2012, 60: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  44. Naito M, Sano A, Matsubara Y, et al. Localization of primordial germ cells or their precursors in stage X blastoderm of chickens and their ability to differentiate into functional gametes in opposite-sex recipient gonads. Reproduction, 2001, 121: 547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Richardson B E, Lehmann R. Mechanisms guiding primordial germ cell migration: strategies from different organisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio, 2010, 11: 37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stebler J, Spieler D, Slanchev K, et al. Primordial germ cell migration in the chick and mouse embryo: The role of the chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12. Dev Biol, 2004, 272: 351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hen G, Friedman-Einat M, Sela-Donenfeld D. Primordial germ cells in the dorsal mesentery of the chicken embryo demonstrate left-right asymmetry and polarized distribution of the EMA1 epitope. J Anat 2014, 224: 556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McLennan R, Dyson L, Prather K W, et al. Multiscale mechanisms of cell migration during development: Theory and experiment. Development, 2012, 139: 2935–2944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bernardo A M, Sprenkels A, Rodrigues G, et al. Chicken primordial germ cells use the anterior vitelline veins to enter the embryonic circulation. Biology Open, 2012, 1: 1146–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hamburger V, Hamilton H L. A series of normal stages in the development of chicken embryo. Devel Dyn, 1992, 195: 231–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Liu.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 10.4 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 2.04 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 1.06 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 5.86 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 2.00 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 4.51 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 3.97 MB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, Y., Liu, J. Transparent soft PDMS eggshell. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 273–283 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5737-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5737-4

Keywords

  • soft PDMS process method
  • biological mould
  • egg-on-a-chip
  • portable device
  • pre-chorioallantoic membrane
  • biomimics