Skip to main content
Log in

Online hybrid test using a finite element program and an explicit integration scheme

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new online hybrid test system combined with substructuring techniques and incorporating finite element methods is developed. In the proposed system, numerical substructure analysis is conducted by ABAQUS/Explicit. An ABAQUS user subroutine is used as the interface between the main control program and ABAQUS to impose the target displacements and determine the reaction forces. No iteration is needed in this system, making it suitable for physical testing. As the approach also avoids the need to modify source code, it will be appealing to a number of real engineering applications. The proposed system adopts a separated-model framework, operator-splitting integration scheme, and data exchange through a socket mechanism. The earthquake responses of a simple steel moment-resisting frame are simulated, and the results obtained from the new system are compared to those obtained from the conventional analysis. It is found that the results obtained from the new system are accurate, demonstrating the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approach. The optimal test parameters are also studied to gain the most accurate results in the minimum time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takanashi K, Nakashima M. Japanese activities on on-line testing. J Eng Mech, 1987, 113:1014–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shing P B, Nakashima M, Bursi O S. Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research. Earthq Spectra, 1996, 12: 29–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahin S A, Shing P B. Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing. J Struct Eng ASCE, 1985, 111: 1482–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakashima M. Development, potential, and limitations of real-time online (pseudo-dynamic) testing. Philos Trans R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci, 2001, 359: 1851–1867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakashima M, Masaoka N. Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 1999, 28: 393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan P, Nakashima M, Tomofuji H. Online test using displacement-force mixed control. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2005, 34: 869–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang T, Yoshitake N, Pan P, et al. Numerical characteristics of peer-to-peer (P2P) internet online hybrid test system and its application to seismic simulation of SRC structure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2007, 37: 265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y S, Yang C T, Hsieh S H, et al. A translator approach for distributed earthquake engineering hybrid simulation across heterogeneous environments. J Chin Inst Eng, 2011, 34: 489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai K, Hsieh S, Yang Y, et al. Network platform for structural experiment and analysis (I). Taiwan: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, 2003. Report No: Report NCREE-03-021

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elkhoraibi T, Mosalam K M. Towards error-free hybrid simulation using mixed variables. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2007, 36: 1497–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Spencer B, Elnashai A. Bayesian updating of fragility functions using hybrid simulation. J Struct Eng, 2013, 139: 1160–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Spencer B, Elnashai A, et al. Substructure hybrid simulation with multiple-support excitation. J Eng Mech, 2012, 138: 867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu B, Deng L, Yang X. Stability of central difference method for dynamic real-time substructure testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2009, 38: 1649–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu B, Wang Z, Bursi O S. Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real-time hybrid simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2013, 42: 1749–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Sause R, Ricles J M, et al. Modified predictor-corrector numerical scheme for real-time pseudo dynamic tests using state-space formulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2005, 34: 271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao X, Castaneda N, Dyke S J. Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2013, 42: 815–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen P C, Tsai K C, Lin P Y. Real-time hybrid testing of a smart base isolation system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Oct 10], Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.2341/abstract

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen P C, Tsai K C. Dual compensation strategy for real-time hybrid testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2013, 42: 1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shing P B, Bursi O S, Vannan M T. Pseudodynamic tests of a concentrically braced frame using substructuring techniques. J Constr Steel Res, 1994, 29: 121–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pegon P, Pinto A V. Pseudo-dynamic testing with substructuring at the ELSA Laboratory. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2000, 29: 905–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magonette G. Development and application of large-scale continuous pseudo-dynamic testing techniques. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser Math Phys Eng Sci, 2001, 359: 1771–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Molina F J, Verzeletti G, Magonette G, et al. Pseudodynamic tests on rubber base isolators with numerical substructuring of the superstructure and strain-rate effect compensation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2002, 31: 1563–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan P, Tada M, Nakashima M. Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test-analysis domains. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2005, 34: 1407–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tada M, Kuwahara S. Basic study on the system of structural analysis by unifying various programs through Internet. J Struct Constr Eng Trans AIJ, 2004, 580:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pinto A V, Pegon P, Magonette G, et al. Pseudo-dynamic testing of bridges using non-linear substructuring. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2004, 33: 1125–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takahashi Y, Fenves G L. Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2006, 35: 267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang T, Nakashima M, Pan P. On-line hybrid test combining with general-purpose finite element software. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2006, 35: 1471–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakashima M, Kaminosono T, Ishida M, et al. Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test. Palm Springs CA, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  29. Combescure D, Pegon P. Alpha operator splitting time integration technique for PSD testing error propagation analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 1997, 16: 427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan P, Tomofuji H, Wang T, et al. Development of peer-to-peer (P2P) internet online hybrid test system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 2006, 35: 867–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, A., Pan, P. & Deng, K. Online hybrid test using a finite element program and an explicit integration scheme. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 163–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5734-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5734-7

Keywords

Navigation