Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 692–698 | Cite as

Density-functional-theory formulation of classical and quantum Hooke’s law

Article Special Topic: Mechanical Behaviour of Micro- and Nano-Scale Materials

Abstract

A fundamental property of solid materials is their stress state. Stress state of a solid or thin film material has profound effects on its thermodynamic stability and physical and chemical properties. The classical mechanical stress (σM) originates from lattice strain (ɛ), following Hooke’s law: σM=, where C is elastic constant matrix. Recently, a new concept of quantum electronic stress (σQE) is introduced to elucidate the extrinsic electronic effects on the stress state of solids and thin films, which follows a quantum analog of classical Hooke’s law: σQE=Ξ(Δn), where Ξ is the deformation potential of electronic states and Δn is the variation of electron density. Here, we present mathematical derivation of both the classical and quantum Hooke’s law from density functional theory. We further discuss the physical origin of quantum electronic stress, arising purely from electronic excitation and perturbation in the absence of lattice strain (ɛ=0), and its relation to the degeneracy pressure of electrons in solid and their interaction with the lattice.

Keywords

stress in the solid quantum electronic stress quantum Hooke’s law density functional theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cammarata R C. Surface and interface stress effects in thin films. Prog Surf Sci, 1994, 46: 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ieong M, Doris B, Kedzierski J, et al. Silicon device scaling to the sub-10-nm regime. Science, 2004, 306: 2057–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schäffler F. High-mobility Si and Ge structures. Semicond Sci Tech, 1997, 12: 1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng J, Qian X F, Huang C W, et al. Strain-engineered artificial atom as a broad-spectrm solar energy funnel. Nat Photon, 2012, 6: 866–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang M, Boone C, Roberts M, et al. Nanomechanical architecture of strained bilayer thin films: From design principles to experimental fabrication. Adv Mater, 2005, 17: 2860–2864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu D, Liu F. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by rolling up patterned graphene nanoribbons using selective atomic adsorption. Nano Lett, 2007, 7: 3046–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu H, Gao H J, Liu F. Theory of directed nucleation of strained islands on patterned substrates. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 101: 216102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu H, Gao H J, Liu F. Quantitative model of heterogeneous nucleation and growth of SiGe quantum dot molecules. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 109: 106103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sazonova V, Yaish Y, Ustunel H, et al. A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. Nature, 2004, 431: 284–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zang J, Liu F. Theory of bending of Si nanocantilevers induced by molecular adsorption: A modified Stoney formula for the calibration of nanomechanochemical sensors. Nanotechnology, 2007, 18: 405501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khang D Y, Jiang H, Huang Y, et al. A stretchable form of single-crystal silicon for high-performance electronics on rubber substrates. Science, 2006, 311: 208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu H, Liu M, Wang Z F, et al. Quantum electronic stress: Density-functional-theory formulation and physical manifestation. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 109: 055501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vosko S H, Wilk L, Nusair M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: A critical analysis. Can J Phys, 1980, 58: 1200–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ceperley D M, Alder B J. Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method. Phys Rev Lett, 1980, 45: 566–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev, 1964, 136: B864–B871CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen O H, Martin R M. First-principles calculation of stress. Phys Rev Lett, 1983, 50: 697–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nielsen O H, Martin R M. Quantum-mechanical theory of stress and force. Phys Rev B, 1985, 32: 3780–3791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parr R G, Yang W T. Density functional approach to the frontier-electron theory of chemical reactivity. J Am Chem Soc, 1984, 106: 4049–4050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madelung O, Schulz M. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, Londolt-Börnstein, Group III, New Series, Vol. 22. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations