Skip to main content
Log in

Approach of fault diagnosis based on similarity degree matching distance function

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new diagnosis method based on the similarity degree matching distance function is proposed. This method solves the problem that the traditional fault diagnosis methods based on transition system model cannot deal with the “special state” which cannot match the target states completely. For evaluating the relationship between the observation and the target states, this paper first defines a new distance function based on the viewpoint of energy to measure the distance between two attribute values. After that, all the distances of the attributes in the state vector are used to synthesize the distance between two states. For calculating the similarity degree between two states, a trend evaluation method is developed. It analyzes the main direction of the trend of the state transfer according to the distances between the observation and each target state and their historical records. Applying the diagnosis method to a primary power subsystem of a satellite, the simulation result shows that it is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Surya N. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Eng, 2003, 27(3): 313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ould-Bouamama B, Harabi R El, Abdelkrim M N, et al. Bond graphs for the diagnosis of chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng, 2012, 36: 301–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duan R X, Zhou H L. A new fault diagnosis method based on fault tree and bayesian networks. Energy Procedia, 2012, 17Part B: 1376–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manna Z, Pnueli A. The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems. New York: Springer, 1992

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Reiter R. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif Intel, 1987, 32(1): 57–95

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams B C, Nayak P P. A reactive planner for a model-based executive. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Iternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, August 23–29, 1997

  7. Kurien J, Nayak P P. Back to the future for consistency-based trajectory tracking. The 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Texas, July 30–August 3, 2000

  8. Hayden S, Sweet A, Christa S, et al. Advanced diagnostic system on Earth Observing One. Proceedings of AIAA Space 2004 Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, Sep. 28–30, 2004

  9. Hayden S, Sweet A, Christa S. Livingstone model-based diagnosis of Earth Observing One. Proceedings of AIAA Intelligent Systems Conference, Chicago, 2004

  10. Jin Y, Wang R X, Xu M Q. A spacecraft autonomous fault diagnosis approach for multiple fault-mode system based on qualitative models (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2012, 6(33): 698–704

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jin Y, Wang R X, Xu M Q. A fault diagnosis approach for spacecraft based on hierarchical transition system model (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2013, 34(2): 401–408

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Y, Wang R X, Xu M Q. A fault diagnosis approach for autonomous spacecraft based on transition-system Model. ICQR2MSE. Chengdu: IEEE, June 15–18, 2012. 595–598

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hou J C, Liang Y, Ren C Z. A multivariate discretization method for continuous attributes. PR&AI, 2011, 24(6): 792–797

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gethsiyal Augasta M, Kathirvalavakumar T. A new discretization algorithm based on range coefficient of dispersion and skewness for neural networks classifier. Appl Soft Comput, 2012, 12(2): 619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferreira A J, Figueiredo Mário A T. An unsupervised approach to feature discretization and selection. Patt Recognit, 2012, 45(9): 3048–3060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwabacher M, Samuels J, Brownston L. The NASA integrated vehicle health management technology experiment for X-37. SPIE AeroSense, Florida, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson D R, Martinez T R. Improved heterogeneous distance functions. J Artif Intell Res, 1997, 6: 1–34

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pak K W, Lap M T, Ke L. Automotive engine power performance tuning under numerical and nominal data. Contl Eng Practice, 2012, 20: 300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Josep D F, Solanas A. A measure of variance for hierarchical nominal attributes. Info Sci, 2008, 178: 4644–4655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng V, Li C H, Kwok J T, et al. Dissimilarity learning for nominal data. Patt Recognit, 2004, 37: 1471–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dettmann E, Becker C, Schmeißer C. Distance functions for matching in small samples. Comput Stat Data Anal, 2012, 55(5): 1942–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Q F, Li G, Chen Y P. Interval-based distance function for identifying RNA structure candidates. J Theor Biol, 2012, 269(1): 280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhattacharya G, Ghosh K, Chowdhury A S. An affinity-based new local distance function and similarity measure for kNN algorithm. Patt Recognit Lett, 2012, 33(3): 356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang Y F, Lin L. Computing the minimal hitting sets with binary HS-Tree (in Chinese). J Softw, 2002, 13(22): 2267–2274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Jin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, R., Jin, Y. & Xu, M. Approach of fault diagnosis based on similarity degree matching distance function. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 2709–2720 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5366-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5366-3

Keywords

Navigation