Skip to main content
Log in

A two-dimensional numerical model coupled with multiple hillslope hydrodynamic processes and its application to subsurface flow simulation

  • Progress of Projects Supported by NSFC
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical hillslope hydrodynamic model is of great importance in facilitating the understanding of rainfall-runoff mechanism. However, most of the currently existing models do not consider the effect of coupled hydrodynamic processes as runoff, subsurface flow or groundwater flow. In this study, the Tsinghua Hillslope Runoff Model based on multiple hydrodynamic process, THRM model, is developed, which couples with Saint Venant equation for surface runoff and Richards equation for variably saturated soil water movement (including subsurface flow and groundwater flow). A finite difference scheme with improved boundary conditions is adopted in this research. It is revealed from the simulation that the THRM model has a high computational efficiency and stability in simulating subsurface flow of the experimental hillslope, which is valuable in assessing the hillslope runoff generation mechanism. A model based sensitivity analysis is also carried out. The impact of boundary condition, grid size and initial soil moisture on simulation result and model stability are revealed, which provides insightful references to understand the mechanism of subsurface flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkby M J. Hillslope Hydrology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1978. 389

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gu W Z, Lu J X, Tang H X, et al. Challenges of basin study to traditional hydrological conceptions: the 50 years anniversary of hydrological basin study of PRC and the 20 years anniversary of Chuzhou Hydrological Laboratory (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2003, 14(3): 368–378

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hewlett J D, Hibbert A R. Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage. J Geophys Res, 1963, 68(4): 1081–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mcguire K J, Weiler M, Mcdonnell J J. Integrating tracer experiments with modeling to assess runoff processes and water transit times. Adv Water Resour, 2007, 30(4): 824–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freer J, Mcdonnell J J, Beven K J, et al. The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow. Water Resour Res, 2002, 38(12): 1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopp L, Harman C, Desilets S L E, et al. Hillslope hydrology under glass: confronting fundamental questions of soil-water-biota co-evolution at biosphere 2. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2009, 13(11): 2105–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiler M, Mcdonnell J J. Conceptualizing lateral preferential flow and flow networks and simulating the effects on gauged and ungauged hillslopes. Water Resour Res, 2007, 43(3): W3403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bárdossy A, Lehmann W. Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part 1: geostatistical analysis. J Hydrol, 1998, 206(1–2): 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiler M, Mcdonnell J. Exploring the first order controls of hillslope scale n and doc flushing: a virtual experiment approach. Presentation at the AGV Fall Meeting. San Francisco, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiler M, Mcdonnell J J. Testing nutrient flushing hypotheses at the hillslope scale: a virtual experiment approach. J Hydrol, 2006, 319(1–4): 339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Troch P A. Hillslope-storage boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complex hillslopes: 1. Formulation and characteristic response. Water Resour Res, 2003, 39(11): 1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graham C B, Woods R A, Mcdonnell J J. Hillslope threshold response to rainfall: (1) a field based forensic approach. J Hydrol, 2010, 393(1–2): 65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham C B, Mcdonnell J J. Hillslope threshold response to rainfall: (2) development and use of a macroscale model. J Hydrol, 2010, 393(1–2): 77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Z Y. Study on Spatial Averaging Watershed Hydrological Model at Macro-scale Based on Probability Approach (in Chinese). Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  15. Šimůnek J, Šejna M. Hydrus Technical Manual. Prague: Czech Republic, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hopp L, Mcdonnell J J. Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. J Hydrol, 2009, 376(3–4): 378–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klaus J, Zehe E. Modelling rapid flow response of a tile-drained field site using a 2 d physically based model: assessment of ‘equifinal’ model setups. Hydrol Process, 2010, 24(12): 1595–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harman C, Sivapalan M. A similarity framework to assess controls on shallow subsurface flow dynamics in hillslopes. Water Resour Res, 2009, 45

  19. Freeze R A. Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas. Water Resour Res, 1972, 8(5): 1272–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian F Q, Hu H P. Numerical model of Richard’s equation based on an ordinary differential equation solver (in Chinese). J Tsinghua Univ (Sci & Tech), 2007, 47(6): 4

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tian F Q, Gao L, Hu H P. A two-dimensional Richards equation solver based on CVODE for variably saturated soil water movement (in Chinese). Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 3251–3264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tromp-Van Meerveld H J, Mcdonnell J J. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis. Water Resour Res, 2006, 42(2): W2411

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu J T, Liang Z M. Role of run-on process of overland flow on hydrological modeling (in Chinese). Adv Water Sci, 2009, 20(4): 467–472

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu D, Tian F, Hu H, et al. The role of run-on for overland flow and the characteristics of runoff generation in the loess plateau, China. Hydrol Sci J, 2012, 57(6): 1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kazezyılmaz-Alhan C M, Medina Jr M A, Rao P. On numerical modeling of overland flow. Appl Math Comput, 2005, 166(3): 724–740

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lei Z D, Yang S X, Xie S C. Soil Water Dynamic (in Chinese). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sisson J B. Drainage from layered field soils: fixed gradient models. Water Resour Res, 1987, 23(11): 2071–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mccord J T. Application of second-type boundaries in unsaturated flow modeling. Water Resour Res, 1991, 27(12): 3257–3260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. van Genuchtech M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1980, 44(5): 892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan L, Wierenga P J. A transformed pressure head-based approach to solve richards’ equation for variably saturated soils. Water Resour Res, 1995, 31(4): 925–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan L, Warrick A W, Wierenga P J. Finite element methods for modeling water flow in variably saturated porous media: numerical oscillation and mass-distributed schemes. Water Resour Res, 1996, 32(6): 1883–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao X, Zhang R, Kravchenko A. A mass-conservative switching method for simulating saturated-unsaturated flow. J Hydrol, 2005, 311(1–4): 254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadegh Zadeh K. Multi-scale inverse modeling in biological mass transport processes. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Maryland: University of Maryland at College Park, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sadegh Zadeh K. A mass-conservative switching algorithm for modeling fluid flow in variably saturated porous media. J Comput Phys, 2011, 230(3): 664–679

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Amestoy P, Duff I, L’Excellent J, et al. A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2001, 23(1): 15–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tromp-Van Meerveld H J, James A L, Mcdonnell J J, et al. A reference data set of hillslope rainfall-runoff response, panola mountain research watershed, united states. Water Resour Res, 2008, 44(6): W6502

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kosugi K, Katsura S, Katsuyama M, et al. Water flow processes in weathered granitic bedrock and their effects on runoff generation in a small headwater catchment. Water Resour Res, 2006, 42(2): W2414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tromp Van Meerveld I, Mcdonnell J J. Comment to spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes. J Hydrol, 2005, 303(1–4): 307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HongChang Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lan, M., Hu, H., Tian, F. et al. A two-dimensional numerical model coupled with multiple hillslope hydrodynamic processes and its application to subsurface flow simulation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 2491–2500 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5347-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5347-6

Keywords

Navigation