Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis of fuel regression rate distribution characteristics in hybrid rocket motors with different fuel types

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents three-dimensional numerical simulations of the hybrid rocket motor with hydrogen peroxide (HP) and hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) propellant combination and investigates the fuel regression rate distribution characteristics of different fuel types. The numerical models are established to couple the Navier-Stokes equations with turbulence, chemical reactions, solid fuel pyrolysis and solid-gas interfacial boundary conditions. Simulation results including the temperature contours and fuel regression rate distributions are presented for the tube, star and wagon wheel grains. The results demonstrate that the changing trends of the regression rate along the axis are similar for all kinds of fuel types, which decrease sharply near the leading edges of the fuels and then gradually increase with increasing axial locations. The regression rates of the star and wagon wheel grains show apparent three-dimensional characteristics, and they are higher in the regions of fuel surfaces near the central core oxidizer flow. The average regression rates increase as the oxidizer mass fluxes rise for all of the fuel types. However, under same oxidizer mass flux, the average regression rates of the star and wagon wheel grains are much larger than that of the tube grain due to their lower hydraulic diameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Arrhenius pre-exponential constant

a :

Regression rate leading coefficient

A p :

Fuel port area

A p 0:

Initial fuel port area

c :

Specific heat

d :

Diameter, hydraulic diameter

E :

Activation energy

G o :

Oxidizer mass flux

e :

Energy

k :

Kinetic energy of turbulent fluctuations

L :

Fuel line length of a cross section

M :

Molecular weight

m o :

Oxidizer mass flow rate

n :

Flux exponent

p :

Pressure

Q :

Rate of heat transfer

R :

Universal gas constant

R i,r :

Rate of production of species i due to reaction r

r :

Fuel regression rate

T :

Tempreture

t :

Time

u :

Velocity

x, y, z :

Coordinate system

Y :

Mass fraction

ɛ :

Turbulence dissipation rate

γ :

Density

µ:

Viscosity

v i, r ′:

Stoichiometric coefficient for reactant i in reaction r

v i,r ″:

Stoichiometric coefficient for product i in reaction r

λ :

Thermal conductivity

con:

Conductive

eq:

Equivalent

f:

Fuel

g:

Gas products

n:

normal direction

P:

product species

p:

fuel port

pyr:

pyrolyze

R:

reactant

r:

reaction

rad:

radiative

ref:

reference

s:

fuel surface

star:

star grain

sol:

solid

tot:

total

tub:

tube grain

wag:

wagon wheel grain

References

  1. Chiaverini M J, Kuo K K. Fundamentals of hybrid rocket combustion and propulsion. Prog Astron Aeron, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsohas J, Appel B, Rettenmaier A, et al. Development and launch of the purdue hybrid rocket technology demonstrator. AIAA Paper 2009-4842, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor F W, Howard R. Dream chaser for space transportation: Tourism, NASA and military integrated on a Atlas V. AIAA Paper 2008-7837, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans B, Boyer E, Kuo K K, et al. Hybrid rocket investigations at penn state university’s high pressure combustion laboratory: Overview and recent results. AIAA Paper 2009-5349, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rao D L, Cai G B, Zhu H, et al. Design and optimization of variable thrust hybrid rocket motors for sounding rockets. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 125–135, doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4597-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li J H, Yu N J, Zeng P, et al. Design and integrated simulation of a pressurized feed system of the dual-thrust hybrid rocket motor. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56: 989–1000, doi: 10.1007/s11431-013-5156-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marxman G A, Gilbert M. Turbulent boundary layer combustion in the hybrid rocket. In: Ninth Symposium (International) on Combustion. New York: Academic Press, 1963. 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marxman G A, Wooldridge C E, Muzzy R J. Fundamentals of hybrid boundary layer combustion. In: Heaterogeneous Combustion Conference. New York: Academic Press, 1964. 485–521

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marxman G A. Combustion in the turbulent boundary layer on a vaporizing surface. In: Tenth Syposium (International) on Combustion. Pittsburgh, PA: Combustion Inst, 1965. 1337–1349

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng G C, Farmer R C, Jones H S, et al. Numerical simulation of the internal ballistics of a hybrid rocket motor. AIAA Paper 94-0554, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Venkateswaran S, Merkle C L. Size scale-up in hyrid rocket motors. AIAA Paper 96-0647, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cai G B, Zeng P, Li X T, et al. Scale effect of fuel regression rate in hybrid rocket motor. Aeros Sci Tech, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.ast.2011.11. 001

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lazzarin M, Faenza M, Barato F, et al. CFD simulation of a hybrid rocket motor with liquid injection. AIAA Paper 2011-5537, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Venkateswaran S, Deshpande M, Merkle C L. The application of preconditioning to reacting flow cornputations. In: 12th AIAA CFD Conference. San Diego, CA, 1995

  15. Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, et al. A new k-ɛ eddy-viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows-model development and validation. Comp Fluids, 1995, 24: 227–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mok J S, Helms W J, Sisco J C, et al. Thermal decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, part 2 modeling studies. J Propul Power, 2005, 21: 996–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen N S, Fleming R W, Derr R L. Role of binders in solid propellant combustion. AIAA J, 1974, 12: 212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiaverini M J, Harting G C, Lu Y, et al. Pyrolysis behavior of hybrid rocket solid fuels under rapid heating conditions. AIAA Paper 97-3078, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magnussen B F, Hjertager B H. On mathematical models of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. In: 16th Symp. on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  20. Story G, Zoladz T, Arves J, et al. Hybrid propulsion demonstration program 250 K hybrid motor. AIAA Paper 2003-5198, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  21. Farbar E, Louwers J, Kaya T. Investigation of metallized and nonmetallized hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene hydrogen peroxide hybrid rockets. J Propul Power, 2007, 23: 476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewin A, Dennis J, Conley B, et al. Experimental determination of performance parameters for a polybutadiene/oxygen hybrid rocket. AIAA Paper 92-3590, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gany A. Scale effects in hybrid motors under similarity conditions. AIAA Paper 96-2846, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swami R D, Gany A. Analysis and testing of similarity and scale effects in hybrid rocket motors. Acta Astronautica, 2003, 52: 628–629

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuoBiao Cai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Tian, H. & Cai, G. Numerical analysis of fuel regression rate distribution characteristics in hybrid rocket motors with different fuel types. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 1807–1817 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5251-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5251-0

Keywords

Navigation