Abstract
Adding a new equation to the two-equation K-ω turbulence model framework, this paper proposed a three-equation turbulence model to determine the density variance for high-speed aero-optics and high-speed compressible turbulent flows. Simulations were performed with the new model for supersonic and hypersonic flat-plate turbulent boundary layer and hypersonic ramp flows. The results showed that the prediction with the present model agrees well with the experimental data and is significantly better than the Lutz’s model in predicting the density variance for the flat-plate flows. Furthermore, the present model can produce more accurate skin pressure and skin heat flux distributions than the original K-ω model in simulating hypersonic compression ramp flows with separation and reattachment and shock/boundary layer interactions. Without introducing a variety of ad hoc wall damping and wall-reflection terms, the proposed three-equation turbulence model is applicable to high-speed aero-optics and turbulent flows of real vehicles of complex configuration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang M, Mani A, Gordeyev S. Physics and computation of aero-optics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2012, 44: 299–321
Pond J E, Sutton G W. Aero-optic performance of an aircraft forward-facing optical turret. J Aircraft, 2006, 43: 600–607
Pond J E. Side mounded IR window aero-optic and aerothermal analysis. SPIE, 1999, 3705: 266–275
Kovasznay L S G. Turbulence in supersonic flow. J Aeronaut Sci, 1953, 20: 657–674
Chu B T, Kovasznay L S G. Nonlinear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compressible gas. J Fluid Mech, 1958, 3: 494–514
Yoshizawa A. Three-equation modeling of inhomogeneous compressible turbulence based on a two-scale direct-interaction approximation. Phys Fluids A, 1990, 5: 838–850
Panda J. Experimental investigation of turbulent density fluctuations and noise generation from heated jets. J Fluid Mech, 2007, 591: 73–96
Pirozzoli S, Bernardini M. Direct numerical simulation database for impinging shock wave turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J, 2011, 49: 1307–1312
Xu C Y, Chen L W, Lu X Y. Large eddy simulation of the compressible flow past a wavy cylinder. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 665: 238–273
Wilcox D C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 3nd ed. California: DCW Industries Inc., 2006
Dong M, Zhou H. The improvement of turbulence modeling for the aerothermal computation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2010, 53: 369–379
Georgiadis N J, Rizzetta D P, Fureby C. Large-eddy simulation: current capabilities, recommended practices, and future research. AIAA J, 2010, 48: 1772–1784
Roy C J, Blottner F G. Review and assessment of turbulence models for hypersonic flows. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2006, 42: 469–530
Lutz S A. Modeling of density fluctuations in supersonic turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J, 1989, 27: 822–823
Lejeune C, Kourta A, Chassaing P. Modelling of high-speed turbulent flows. AIAA Paper, 1996, 1996–2041
Taulbee D, VanOsdol J. Modeling turbulent compressible flows: the mass fluctuating velocity and squared density. AIAA Paper, 1991, 1991–0524
Wei H, Chen C P. A nonequilibrium algebraic model for turbulent density fluctuations. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1996, 39: 3989–3991
Huang P G, Bradshaw P, Coakley T J. Turbulence models for compressible boundary layers. AIAA J, 1994, 32: 735–740
Lele S K. Compressibility effects on turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1994, 26: 211–254
Sarkar S. The stabilizing effect of compressibility in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech, 1995, 282: 163–186
Thacker W D, Sarkar S, Gatski T B. Analyzing the influence of compressibility on the rapid pressure-strain rate correlation in turbulent shear flows. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn, 2007, 21: 171–199
Wang X, Zhong X. Effect of compressibility on strong shock and turbulence interactions. AIAA Paper, 2012, 2012–1243
Wang S Z, Gao Z X, Lee C H. Numerical investigation of compressibility effects in turbulent channel flows using large eddy simulation. Sci China Phys Mech Astron, 2012, 55: 305–315
Wilcox D C. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J, 1988, 26: 1299–1310
Sarkar S. The pressure-dilatation correlation in compressible flows. Phys Fluids A, 1992, 4: 2674–2682
Speziale C G, Abid R, Anderson E C. Critical evaluation of two-equation models for near-wall turbulence. AIAA J, 1992, 30: 324–331
Yee H C, Klopfer G H, Montagne J L. High-resolution shock-capturing schemes for inviscid and viscous hypersonic flows. J Comput Phys, 1990, 88: 31–61
Liu J Y, Lee C H. Comparison of two-equation turbulent models for hypersonic flow simulations (in Chinese). J Beijing Univ Aeron Astron, 2007, 33: 1131–1135
Kistler A L. Fluctuation measurements in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids, 1959, 2: 290–296
Laderman A J, Demetriades A. Turbulent shear stresses in compressible boundary layers. AIAA J, 1979, 17: 736–744
Laderman A J, Demetriades A. Mean and fluctuating flow measurements in the hypersonic boundary layer over a cooled wall. J Fluid Mech, 1974, 63: 121–144
Settles G S, Dodson L J. Hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction database. NASA-CR-177577, 1991
Coleman G T, Stollery J L. Heat transfer from hypersonic turbulent flow at a wedge compression corner. J Fluid Mech, 1972, 56: 741–752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J. A three-equation turbulence model for high-speed flows. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 803–811 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5178-5