Skip to main content
Log in

Geometry-dependent springback behaviors of thin-walled tube upon cold bending

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As one kind of key lightweight components with enormous quantities and diversities, the bent tubular parts have attracted increasing applications in aerospace, automobile, etc. Thus, how the inevitable springback behaves under different bending specifications should be fully addressed to efficiently achieve the precision forming of various bent tubes. Taking the medium strength thin-walled 6061-T4 Al-alloy tube as the objective, via the deformation theory of plasticity, explicit/implicit FE method and experimental approaches, we explored and clarified the nonlinear springback rules of the tubes and corresponding mechanisms in universal rotary draw bending regarding angular springback and radius growth by deliberately changing the tube diameter D and wall thickness t. The geometry dependent springback behaviors of thin-walled tube upon cold bending are thus revealed: 1) With the increasing of D, the tangent tensile strain increases and the proportional coefficient decreases, which causes the angular springback to decrease, while the radius springback increases due to the larger bending radius. 2) With the increasing of t, the tangent tensile strain decreases and the proportional coefficient increases, resulting in the increase of both angular springback and radius springback. 3) Under the same D/t, the angular springback varies little, while the radius springback increases with the larger diameter D. 4) The D/t can be used as a reasonable nondimensional index to evaluate the springback angle; as to the radius growth, the individual effects of the D and t should be considered. 5) The verification of the above results was conducted by experiments and analytical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welo T. Sheet Metal Forming. In: Francisco Chinesta and Elias Cueto, Advances in Material Forming (Esaform 10 years on), Paris: Springer. 2007. 175–191

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Engineering and Material Science, NSFC. Development Strategy Report of Mechanical Engineering Discipline (2011–2020) (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang H, Li H, Zhang Z Y, et al. Advances and trends on tube bending forming technologies. Chin J Aeronaut, 2012, 25: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang H, Ren N, Zhan M, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the prediction of bendability limit of QSTE340 welded tube in NC bending process. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 2264–2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corona E, Lee L H, Kyriakids S. Yield anisotropy effects on buckling of circular tubes under bending. Int J Solid Struct, 2006, 43: 7099–7118

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Li H, Yang H, Zhan M. A study on plastic wrinkling in thin-walled tube bending via an energy-based wrinkling prediction model. Modelling Simul. Mater Sci Eng, 2009, 17: 035007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Day M L. Bending collapse of thin-walled circular tubes and computational application. Thin Wall Struct, 2008, 46: 442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li H, Yang H, Zhan M, et al. Role of mandrel in NC precision bending process of thin-walled tube. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 2007, 47: 1164–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan J, Yang H, Zhan M, et al. Forming limits under multi-index constraints in NC bending of aluminum alloy thin-walled tubes with large diameters. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53(2): 326–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li H, Yang H, Yan J, et al. Numerical study on deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube NC bending with large diameter and small bending radius. Comp Mater Sci, 2009, 45: 921–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim H, Lee M G, Sung J H, et al. Time-dependent springback of advanced high strength steels. Int J Plasticity, 2012, 29: 42–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li K P, Carden W P, Wagoner R H. Simulation of springback. Int J Mech Sci, 2002, 44: 103–122

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Karafillis A P, Boyce M C. Tooling and binder design for sheet metal forming processes compensating springback error. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 1996, 36: 503–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J, Yin J, Ma R, et al. Springback equation of small curvature plane bending. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 2386–2396

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lou H Z, Stelson K A. Three-dimensional tube geometry control for rotary draw tube bending, Part 1: Bend angle and overall tube geometry control. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2001, 123: 258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu W, Zhang P, Zeng X Q, et al. Bendability of the wrought magnesium alloy AM30 tubes using a rotary draw bender. Mater Sci Eng A, 2008, 486(1–2): 596–601

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang N C. Plastic-deformation analysis in tube bending. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 2000, 77: 751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-qureshi H A. Elastic-plastic analysis of tube bending. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 1999, 39: 87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhan M, Yang H, Huang L, et al. Springback analysis of numerical control bending of thin-walled tube using numerical-analytic method. J Mater Process Technol, 2006, 177: 197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu R J, Yang H, Zhan M, et al. Research on the springback of thin-walled tube NC bending based on the numerical simulation of the whole process. Comp Mater Sci, 2008, 42: 537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang Z Q, Yang H, Zhan M, et al. Coupling effects of material properties and the bending angle on the springback angle of a titanium alloy tube during numerically controlled bending. Mater Des, 2010, 31: 2001–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan M, Jiang Z Q, Yang H, et al. Numerically controlled bending performance of medium strength TA18 titanium alloy tubes under different die sets. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E D X, Liu Y. Springback and time-dependent springback of 1Cr18Ni9Ti stainless steel tubes under bending. Mater Des, 2010, 31: 1256–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. SAE Aerospace material specification. AMS-WW-T-700/6A. Tube, aluminum alloy, drawn, seamless, 6061, 2007

  25. Yang H, Li H, Zhan M. Friction role in bending behaviors of thin-walled tube in rotary-draw-bending under small bending radii. J Mater Process Technol, 2010, 210: 2273–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E D X, Guo X D, Ning R X. Analysis of strain neutral layer displacement in tube-bending process (in Chinese). J Mech Eng, 2009, 45(3): 307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathworks product documents. 2011

  28. Li H, Yang H. A study on multi-defect constrained bendability of thin-walled tube NC bending under different clearance. Chin J Aeronaut, 2011, 24: 102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Narasimhan N, Lovell M. Predicting springback in sheet metal forming: an explicit to implicit sequential solution procedure. Finite Elem Anal Des, 1999, 33: 29–42

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual. Version 6.7. 2007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Yang, H., Tian, Y. et al. Geometry-dependent springback behaviors of thin-walled tube upon cold bending. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 55, 3469–3482 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-5001-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-5001-8

Keywords

Navigation