Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid undulatory kinematics of a robotic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus): Theoretical modeling and experimental investigation

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fishes that use undulatory locomotion occasionally change their inherent kinematics in terms of some natural behavior. This special locomotion pattern was vividly dubbed “hybrid kinematics” by biologists recently. In this paper, we employed a physical model with body shape of a Mackerel (Scomber scombrus), to use the three most typical undulatory kinematics: anguillform, carangiform and thunniform, to investigate the hydrodynamic performance of the so-called “hybrid kinematics” biological issue. Theoretical models of both kinematics and hydrodynamics of the physical model swimming were developed. Base on this model, the instantaneous force produced by fish undulatory body and flapping tail were calculated separately. We also quantitatively measured the hydrodynamic variables of the robotic model swimming with the three undulatory kinematics on an experimental apparatus. The results of both theoretical model and experiment showed that the robot with thunniform kinematics not only reaches a higher speed but also is more efficient during steady swimming mode. However, anguilliform kinematics won the speed race during the initial acceleration. Additionally, the digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) results showed some difference of the wake flow generated by the robotic swimmer among the three undulatory kinematics. Our findings may possibly shed light on the motion control of a biomimetic robotic fish and provide certain evidence of why the “hybrid kinematics” exists within the typical undulatory locomotion patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sfakiotakis M, Lane D M, Davies J C. Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 1999, 24: 237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tytell E D. Do trout swim better than eels? Challenges for estimating performance based on the wake of self-propelled bodies. Exp Fluids, 2007, 43: 701–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tytell E D, Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F, et al. Disentangling the functional roles of morphology and motion in the swimming of fish. J Exp Biol, 2010, 50: 1140–1156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tytell E D, Lauder G V. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming. I. Wake structure. J Exp Biol, 2004, 207: 1825–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lighthill M J. Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1971, 179: 125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Z, Shatara S, Tan X B. Modeling of biomimetic robotic fish propelled by an ionic polymer-metal composite caudal fin. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2010, 15: 448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wen L, Wang T M, Liang J H, et al. Novel method for modeling and control investigation of efficient-swimming carangiform robotic fish. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2012, 59: 3176–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wen L, Wang T M, Wu G H, et al. Hydrodynamic investigation of a self-propulsive robotic fish based on a force-feedback control method. Bioinspir Biomim, 2012, 7: 036012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu J Z, Tan M, Wang S, et al. Development of a biomimetics robotic fish and its control algorithm. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern Part B-Cyber, 2004, 34: 1798–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou H, Hu T J, Xie H B, et al. Computational and experimental study on dynamic behavior of underwater robots propelled by bionic undulating fins. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 2966–2971

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou C, Chao Z Q, Wang S, et al. A marsupial robotic fish team: Design, motion and cooperation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 2896–2904

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang G, Zhang D B, Lin L X, et al. CPGs control method using a new oscillator in robotic fish. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 2914–2919

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Arash T, Sakineh O. A novel miniature virus-inspired swimming robot for biomedical applications. Sci China Tech Sci, 2010, 53: 2883–2895

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang T M, Wen L, Liang J H, et al. Fuzzy vorticity control of a biomimetic robotic fish using a flapping lunate tail. J Bionic Engi, 2010, 7: 56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hultmark M. Flow field measurements in the wake of a robotic lamprey. Exp Fluids, 2007, 43: 683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hess F, Videler J J. Fast continuous swimming of Saithe (Pollachius virens): A dynamic analysis of bending moments and muscle power. J Exp Biol, 1984, 109: 229–251

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barrett D S, Triantafyllou M S, Yue D K P. Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion. J Fluid Mech, 1999, 392: 183–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson J M, Chhabra N. Maneuvering and stability performance of a robotic tuna. Integr Comp Biol, 2002, 42: 118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewar H, Graham J. Studies of tropical tuna swimming performance in a large water tunnel. J Exp Biol, 1994, 192:45–59

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wen L, Wang T M, Liang J H, et al. A novel method based on a force-feedback technique for the hydrodynamic investigation of kinematics effects on robotic fish. In Proc IEEE Conf Robot Autom, 2011. 203–208

  21. Wen L, Wu G H, Liang J H, et al. Hydrodynamic experimental investigation on efficient swimming of robotic fish using self-propelled method. Int J Offshore Polar Eng, 2010, 20: 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson S D, Porfiri M, Rovardi A. A particle image velocimetry study of vibrating ionic polymer metal composites in aqueous environments. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2009, 14: 474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blake R W, Domenici P. Biomechanics in Animal Behavior. Oxford: BIOS Scientific, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donley J M, Dickson K A Swimming kinematics of juvenile kawakawa tuna (Euthynnus affinis) and chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus). J Exp Biol, 2000, 203: 3103–3116

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fish F E, Lauder G V. Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2006, 38: 193–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Triantafyllou M S, Triantafyllou G S, Yue D K P. Hydrodynamics of fishlike swimming. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 2000, 32: 33–53

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Gray J, Hancock G J. The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatoza. J Exp Biol, 1955, 32: 802–814

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoerner S F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Brick Town, NJ: Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schlichting H. Boundary-Layer Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Dickinson M H. Unsteady mechanisms of force generation in aquatic and aerial locomotion. Am Zool, 1996, 36: 537–554

    Google Scholar 

  31. Streitlien K, Tranitafyllou G S. On thrust estimates for flapping foils. J Fluids Structures, 1998, 12: 47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Milne-Thompson L M. Theoretical Aerodynamics. New York: Macmillan. 1966

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mori N, Chang K. Introduction to MPIV-PIV toolbox in MATLAB- version 0.965 [EB/OL]. 2004-12-21. http://sauron.urban.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp/~mori/softwares/mpiv

  34. Wu G H, Yang Y, Zeng L J. Kinematics, hydrodynamics and energetic advantages of burst-and-coast swimming of koi carps (Cyprinus carpio koi). J Exp Biol, 2007, 210: 2181–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang J H, Wang T M, Wen L. Development of a two-joint robotic fish for real-world exploration. J Field Robotics, 2011, 28: 70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Buchholz J H, Smits A J. The wake structure and thrust performance of a rigid low-aspect-ratio pitching panel. J Fluid Mech, 2008, 603: 331–365

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Borazjani I. On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled fish. J Exp Biol, 2010, 213: 89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng J Y. Note on the calculation of propeller efficiency using elongated body theory. J Exp Biol, 1994, 192: 169–177

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liao J C, Beal D N, Lauder G V, et al. Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science, 2003, 302: 1566–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chou C L, Low K H. Design and locomotion control of a biomimetic underwater vehicle with fin propulsion. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2012, 17: 25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu T J, Shen L C, Lin L X, et al. Biological inspirations, kinematics modeling, mechanism design and experiments on an undulating robotic fin inspired by Gymnarchus niloticus. Mech Machine Theory, 2009, 44: 633–645

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Li Wen

  2. Robotic Institute in School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Li Wen, TianMiao Wang & JianHong Liang

  3. State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    GuanHao Wu

Authors
  1. Li Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. TianMiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. GuanHao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. JianHong Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, L., Wang, T., Wu, G. et al. Hybrid undulatory kinematics of a robotic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus): Theoretical modeling and experimental investigation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 55, 2941–2952 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-4952-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-4952-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation