Abstract
The entry-glide guidance strategy for hypersonic vehicles that can satisfy both terminal and path constraints is investigated in this paper. We propose a quasi-equilibrium glide adaptive guidance methodology based on the quasi-equilibrium glide condition (QEGC), which innovatively utilizes the quasi-equilibrium glide phenomenon in lifting entry. With the aid of QEGC, both range and terminal velocity can be predicted analytically with high precision. The path constraints are converted into angle of attack constraints, which has been difficult to realize by using traditional predictive guidance methods. The algorithm is independent of the standard trajectory. All the guidance commands, including the bank angle and the angle of attack, are calculated analytically in real time, which endows the algorithm with sufficient adapbility. The results of a CAV-H vehicle guidance test show that the algorithm leads the vehicle along a quasi-equilibrium glide trajectory satisfying both the terminal and path constraints and has sufficient flexibility for occasional mission changes. Furthermore, the robustness of the guidance algorithm under disturbances is validated through a Monte Carlo simulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harpold J C, Graves C A. Shuttle entry guidance. J Astronaut Sci, 1979, XXVII: 239–268
Tigges M, Ling L. A predictive guidance algorithm for mars entry. In: 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reno, Nevada: AIAA-89-0632, 1989. 1–11
Bryant L E, Tigges M A, Ives D G. Analytic drag control for precision landing and aerocapture. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Boston: AIAA, 1998. 1–12
Tu K Y, Munir M S, Mease K D, et al. Drag-based predictive tracking guidance for Mars precision landing. AIAA-98-4573, 1998. 1–11
Masciarelli J P, Rousseau S, Fraysse H, et al. An analytic aerocapture guidance algorithm for the Mars Sample Return Orbiter. AIAA-2000-4116, 2000. 525–532
Powell R W. Numerical roll reversal predictor-corrector aerocapture and precision landing guidance algorithms for the mars surveyor program 2001 missions. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Boston: AIAA-98-4574, 1998. 1–9
Dukeman G A. Profile-following entry guidance using linear quadratic regulator theory. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Monterey: AIAA-2002-4457, 2002. 1–10
Shen Z J, Lu P. Onboard generation of three-dimensional constrained entry trajectories. J Guid Control Dynam, 2003, 26: 111–121
Youssef H, Chowdhry R S, Lee H, et al. Predictor-corrector entry guidance for reusable launch vehicles. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Montreal: In: AIAA-2001-4043, 2001. 1–8
Joshi A, Sivan K. Reentry guidance for generic rlv using optimal perturbations and error weights. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. San Francisco: AIAA-2005-6438, 2005. 1–14
Xue S B, Lu P. Constrained predictor-corrector entry guidance. J Guid Control Dynam, 2010, 33: 1273–1281
Joshi A, Sivan K, Amma S S. Predictor-corrector reentry guidance algorithm with path constraints for atmospheric entry vehicles. J Guid Control Dynam, 2007, 30: 1307–1318
Hanson J M, Jones R E. Test results for entry guidance methods for reusable launch vehicles. In: 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno: AIAA-2004-701, 2004. 1–10
Hu Z D, Guo C F, Cai H. Analytical predictive guidance for space-to -ground kinetic weapon in reentry (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2009, 30: 1039–1044
Zhao H Y. Dynamics and Guidance for Reentry Vehicles (in Chinese). Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 1997. 74–81
Vinh N X. Optimal Trajectories in Atmospheric Flight. New York: Elsevier, 1981
Corporation T P. A Common Aero Vehicle (CAV) Model, Description, and Employment Guide. www.dtic.mil/matris/sbir/sbir041/srch/af031a.doc, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, M., Chen, K., Liu, L. et al. Quasi-equilibrium glide adaptive guidance for hypersonic vehicles. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 55, 856–866 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4727-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4727-z