Skip to main content
Log in

Research on failure scenarios of domes based on form vulnerability

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, form vulnerability theory was applied to the analysis of the failure mechanisms of single-layer latticed spherical shells subjected to seismic excitations. Three 1/10 scale testing models were designed with characteristics as follows: Model 1 possesses overall uniform stiffness and is expected to collapse in the strength failure mode as some members become plastic; Model 2 possesses six man-made weak parts located on six radial main rib zones and is expected to collapse in the dynamic instability mode with all members still in the elastic stage; Model 3 strengthens the six weak zones of Model 2, and therefore, its stiffness is uniform. Model 3 is proposed to collapse in the strength failure mode when the members are still in the elastic stage. By increasing the peak ground accelerations of seismic waves gradually, the shaking table tests were carried out until all three models collapsed (or locally collapsed). On the basis of form vulnerability theory, topological hierarchy models of the test models were established through a clustering process, and various failure scenarios, including overall collapse scenarios and partial collapse scenarios, were identified by unzipping corresponding hierarchical models. By comparison of the failure scenarios based on theoretical analysis and experiments, it was found that vulnerability theory could effectively reflect the weakness zones in topological relations of the structures from the perspective of internal causes. The internal mechanisms of the distinct failure characteristics of reticulated shells subjected to seismic excitations were also revealed in this process. The well-formedness of structural clusters, Q, is closely related to the collapse modes, i.e., uniform changes of Q indicate a uniform distribution of overall structural stiffness, which indicates that strength failure is likely to happen; conversely, non-uniform changes of Q indicate that weak zones exist in the structure, and dynamic instability is likely to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ye J H. Dynamic stability analysis of single layer reticulated shell structures. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa K, Kato S. Elastic-plastic dynamic buckling analysis of reticular domes subjected to earthquake motion. Int J Space Struct, 1997, (3&4): 205–215

  3. Fan F, Shen S Z. Study on the dynamic strength failure of reticulated domes under severe earthquakes. In: Proc IASS Int Symp. Montpellier, France: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2004. 140–141

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo H S, Shen S Z. Analysis method of dynamic stability of single-layer reticulated domes (in Chinese). J Building Struct, 2003, 24: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shen S Z, Zhi X D. Failure mechanism of reticular shells subjected to dynamic actions (in Chinese). China Civil Eng J, 2005, 38: 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan H Y, Ye J H, Shen S Z, et al. Failure mechanism analysis of single-layer spherical shells subjected to simple dynamic loads (in Chinese). Earthquake Resistant Eng Retrofitting, 2006, 28: 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhi X D, Fan F, Shen S Z. Seismic failure of single-layer reticulated domes (in Chinese). Eng Mech, 2008, 25: 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Du W F, Gao B Q, Dong S L. Double-control criterion of dynamical strength failure for single layer latticed shells (in Chinese). J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci), 2007, 41: 1916–1920

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wei Z, Ye J H, Shen S Z. Failure type prediction of single-layer spherical shells under earthquake based on maximum entropy (in Chinese). J Vib Shock, 2008, 27: 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu X, Blockley D I, Woodman N J. Vulnerability of structural systems part1: rings and clusters. Civ Eng Environ Syst, 1993, 10: 301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu X, Blockley D I, Woodman N J. Vulnerability of structural systems part 2: Rings and clusters. Civ Eng Environ Syst, 1993, 10: 319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu Z, Yu Y, Woodman N J, et al. A theory of structural vulnerability. Structl Eng, 1999, 77: 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal J, Blockley D I, Woodman N J. Vulnerability of 3-dimensional trusses. Struct Saf, 2001, 23: 203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agarwal J, Blockley D I, Woodman N J. Vulnerability of structural systems. Struct Saf, 2003, 25: 263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X C. Finite Element Method (in Chinese). Beijing: Tsinghai University Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan Z F, Song S D. Multivariate Statistical Analysis (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiHong Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ye, J., Liu, W. & Pan, R. Research on failure scenarios of domes based on form vulnerability. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 2834–2853 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4590-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4590-y

Keywords

Navigation