Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analytical investigations and fuzzy logic-based modeling of the impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 12 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the present paper, Charpy impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites in both crack divider and crack arrester configurations has been investigated. In both configurations, an analytical investigation has been carried out to evaluate the effects of layers thickness on impact resistance of the specimens. A model based on fuzzy logic for predicting impact resistance of the specimens has been presented. For purpose of building the model, training and testing using experimental results from 126 specimens produced from two basic composites were conducted. The data used for the input data in fuzzy logic models are arranged in a format of 7 input parameters that cover the thickness of layers, the number of layers, the adhesive type, the crack tip configuration, the content of SiC particles, the content of methacrylated butadiene-styrene particles and the number of test trial. According to these input parameters, in the fuzzy logic model, the impact resistance of each specimen was predicted. The training and testing results in the fuzzy logic model have shown a strong potential for predicting impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Vaziri R, Quan X, Olson M D. Impact analysis of laminated composite plates and shells by super finite elements. Int J Impact Eng, 1996, 18: 765–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu D, Raju B B, Dang X. Impact perforation resistance of laminated and assembled composite plates. Int J Impact Eng, 2000, 24: 764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard S J, Pateras S K, Clyne T W. Effect of interfacial adhesion on toughness of metal/ceramic laminates. Mater Sci Technol, 1998, 14: 535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao L, Abbaschian R. Role of matrix/reinforcement interfaces in the fracture toughness of brittle materials toughened by ductile reinforcements. Metal Trans A, 1992, 23A: 2863–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu T C, Evans A G, Hecht R J, et al. Toughening of MoSi2 with a ductile (niobium) reinforcement. Acta Metall Mater, 1991, 39: 1853–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis LY, Lewandowski J J. Effects of layer thickness on impact toughness of Al/Al-SiCp laminates. Mater Sci Eng A, 1994, 183: 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McLelland A R A, Atkinson H V, Anderson P R G. Thixoforming of a novel layered metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Technol, 1999, 15: 939–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tekyeh-Marouf B, Bagheri R, Mahmudi R. Effects of number of layers and adhesive ductility on impact behavior of laminates. Mater Lett, 2004, 58: 2721–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman J G. Fracture toughness of 7075-T6 and -T651 sheet, plate and multilayered adhesive-bonded panels. J Basic Eng Trans ASME, 1967, 89: 503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goolsby R D. Fracture of crack divider Al/Al laminates. In: International Conference on Composite Materials, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1978. 941–960

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manoharan M, Ellis L, Lewandowski J J. Laminated composites with improved toughness. Scr Metall Mater, 1990, 24: 1515–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laliberte J F, Poon C, Straznicky P V, et al. Applications of fibermetal laminates. Polym Comp, 2000, 21: 558–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akkurt S, Tayfur G, Can S. Fuzzy logic model for prediction of cement compressive strength. Cement Concr Res, 2004, 34(8): 1429–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baykasoglu A, Dereli T, Tanis S. Prediction of cement strength using soft computing techniques. Cement Concr Res, 2004, 34(11): 2083–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM E23, Standard test methods noteched bar impact testing of metallic materials. FLual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIST Recommended Practice Guide: Computing Uncertainty for Charpy Impact Machine Test Results, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, 2008

  17. He M Y, Heredia F E, Wissuchek D J, et al. The mechanics of crack growth in layered materials. Acta Metall Mater, 1993, 41: 1223–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao H C, Evans A G. On crack extension in ductile/brittle laminates. Acta Metall Mater, 1991, 39: 2997–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Osman T M, Lewandowski J J. Influence of thickness in the fracture resistance of conventional and laminated materials. Scr Metall Mater, 1994, 31: 191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pandey A B, Majumdar B S, Miracle D B. Laminated particulate-reinforced aluminum composites with improved toughness. Acta Mater, 2001, 49: 405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson T L. Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. Boston: CRC press, 1991

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zadeh L A. Fuzzy set. Inform Control, 1965, 8: 338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mamdani E H. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plants. Proc IEEE, 1976, 121(12): 1585–1588

    Google Scholar 

  24. Topcu I B, Sarıdemir M. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Comp Mater Sci, 2008, 41(3): 305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Nazari.

About this article

Cite this article

Nazari, A., Didehvar, N. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analytical investigations and fuzzy logic-based modeling of the impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 2785–2794 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4531-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4531-9

Keywords

Navigation