Skip to main content
Log in

Chang’E-2 satellite asymmetric-descent orbit control technology

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To accomplish high-resolution imaging of the preselected landing area, it was necessary for the Chang’E-2 mission to perform orbital maneuvering on the far side of the moon to meet the conditional height requirement of the imaging area. Engine shutdown would be executed invisibly on the back side of the moon if the descent maneuver mode opposite to the target perilune or the fuel optimal maneuver mode was used. To ensure the satellite safety, the project collectivety required that the engine shutdown should be designed to be executed in the domestic segmental arcs and meet the requirement of satellite emergency treatment simultaneously. Accordingly, the asymmetric-descent orbit control technology was adopted by offsetting the maneuver point, which obtained the orbit control parameters of finite-thrust mode with an iteration algorithm and modified the results with target perilune drift estimation. The Chang’E-2 satellite declined to the target of 100 km×15 km orbit successfully on 26 October 2010, and has been flying for 32 circles in the experimental orbit to accomplish the preselected landing area imaging. This paper describes the mechanism and realization method of the asymmetric-descent orbit control technology and evaluates the maneuver effect with the actual mission data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang P J, Zhang H, Qu G J. Design and optimization of the descending trajectory and guidance of lunar soft-landing (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2007, 28(5): 1175–1179

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett F V. Apollo experience report-mission planning for Lunar Module descent and ascent. Manned Spacecraft Center, Housten, Texas 77058, NASA Technical Note, Report No: NASA TN D-6846, 1972. 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kato M, Sasaki S, Takizawa Y. The Kaguya mission overview. Space Sci Rev, 2010, 154: 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ockels J W. EuroMoon 2000-a plan for a European lunar south pole expedition. Acta Astronaut, 1997, 41(4–10): 579–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xi X N, Zeng G Q, Ren Y, et al. Orbit Design of Lunar Probe (in Chinese). Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2001. 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y Y, Liu R, Zhou J. Research on lunar gravity field and maintenance of lunar satellite orbit (in Chinese). Flight Dynam, 2009, 27(6): 56–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin L, Wang X. An Orbital Dynamics of Lunar Probe (in Chinese). Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006. 88–90

    Google Scholar 

  8. Konopliv A S, Binder A B, Hood L L, et al. Improved gravity field of the moon from Lunar Prospector. Science, 1998, 281(5382): 1476–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Konopliv A S, Asmar S W, Carranza E, et al. Recent gravity models as a result of the Lunar Prospector mission. Icarus, 2001, 150(1): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DeYun Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Peng, D. et al. Chang’E-2 satellite asymmetric-descent orbit control technology. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 2247–2253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4516-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4516-8

Keywords

Navigation