Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of solar wind dynamic pressure on geomagnetic Dst index during various magnetic storms

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dst index, designed as a proxy of ring current intensity, is known to be also affected by other magnetospheric current systems, e.g. magnetopause current. The pressure-corrected Dst index is obtained by removing the effects of the solar wind dynamic pressure and the quiet time ring current. However, all previous studies treated the correction coefficient as an averaged parameter for storms of different intensity. In this paper, based on the Burton’s equations and employing two independent methods, we will show a positive correlation between pressure-correction coefficient b and the intensity of the storms. We divided our storm database (872 storms in total) into three categories according to the intensity of storms. In order to improve the accuracy of calculating, we also used the higher-resolution SYM-H index data instead of Dst index to compute the corrected Dst index during different storms. Furthermore, we are able to provide corrected magnetic storm index with high-time resolution (∼ 1 min).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iyemori T, Rao D R K. Decay of the Dst field of geomagnetic disturbances after substorm onset and its implication to storm-substorm relation. Ann Geophysicae, 1996, 14: 608–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burton R K, McPherron R L, Russell C T. An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst. J Geophys Res, 1975, 80: 4204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner N E, Baker D N, Pulkkinen T I, et al. Evaluation of the tail current contribution to Dst. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(A3): 5431–5439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien T P, McPherron R L. An empirical phase space analysis of ring current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 7707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C B, Chao J K, Lin C H. Influence of the solar wind dynamic pressure on the decay and injection of the ring current. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(A9): 1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballatore P, Gonzalez W D. On the estimates of the ring current injection and decay. Earth Planets Space, 2003, 55: 427–435

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siscoe G L, McPherron R L, Jordanova V K. Diminished contribution of ram pressure to Dst during magnetic storms. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: A12227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie H, Gopalswamy N, St Cyr O C, et al. Effects of solar wind dynamic pressure and preconditioning on large geomagnetic storms. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35: L06S08. doi:10.1029/2007GL032298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundstedt H, Gleisner H, Wintoft P. Operational forecasts of the geomagnetic Dst index. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29(24): 2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien T P, McPherron R L. Seasonal and diurnal variation of Dst dynamics. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107(A11): 1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J C, Liemohn M W, Kozyra J U, et al. A statistical comparison of solar wind sources of moderate and intense geomagnetic storms at solar minimum and maximum. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: A01104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wanliss J A, Showalter K M. High-resolution global storm index: Dst versus SYM-H. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: A02202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Von Steiger R, Schwadron N A, Fisk L A, et al. Composition of quasistationary solar wind flows from Ulysses/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer. J Geophys Res, 105(A12): 27217–27238

  14. Kozyra J U, Liemohn M W, Clauer C R, et al. Multistep Dst development and ring current composition changes during the 4–6 June 1991 magnetic storm. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107(A8): 1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burke W J, Gentile L C, Huang C Y. Penetration electric fields driving main phase Dst. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: A07208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shepherd S G. Polar cap potential saturation: Observations, theory, and modeling. J Atmos Solar-Terre Phys, 2007, 69(3): 234–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang C S, Foster J C, Goncharenko L P, et al. Variations of lowlatitude geomagnetic fields and Dst index caused by magnetospheric substorms. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: A05219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei Y, Pu Z. Hong M,et al. Westward ionospheric electric field perturbations on the dayside associated with substorm processes. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A12209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nose M, Koshiishi H, Matsumoto H, et al. Magnetic field dipolarization in the deep inner magnetosphere and its role in development of O+-rich ring current. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A00J03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zong Q G, Zhou X Z, Wang Y F, et al. Energetic electron response to ULF waves induced by interplanetary shocks in the outer radiation belt. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A10204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X Y, Zong Q G, Wang Y F, et al. ULF waves excited by negative/positive solar wind dynamic pressure impulses at geosynchronous orbit. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A10221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zong Q G, Reinisch B W, Song P, et al. Dayside ionospheric response to the intense interplanetary shocks/solar wind discontinuities: Observations from the Digisonde Global Ionospheric Radio Observatory. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A06304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to QiuGang Zong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Zong, Q., Wei, Y. et al. Influence of solar wind dynamic pressure on geomagnetic Dst index during various magnetic storms. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 1445–1454 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4319-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4319-y

Keywords

Navigation