Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective robust airfoil optimization based on non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to improve airfoil performance under different flight conditions and to make the performance insensitive to off-design condition at the same time, a multi-objective optimization approach considering robust design has been developed and applied to airfoil design. Non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation is adopted in airfoil design process, control points and related weights around airfoil are used as design variables. Two airfoil representation cases show that the NURBS method can get airfoil geometry with max geometry error less than 0.0019. By using six-sigma robust approach in multi-objective airfoil design, each sub-objective function of the problem has robustness property. By adopting multi-objective genetic algorithm that is based on non-dominated sorting, a set of non-dominated airfoil solutions with robustness can be obtained in the design. The optimum robust airfoil can be traded off and selected in these non-dominated solutions by design tendency. By using the above methods, a multi-objective robust optimization was conducted for NASA SC0712 airfoil. After performing robust airfoil optimization, the mean value of drag coefficient at Ma0.7–0.8 and the mean value of lift coefficient at post stall regime (Ma0.3) have been improved by 12.2% and 25.4%. By comparing the aerodynamic force coefficients of optimization result, it shows that: different from single robust airfoil design which just improves the property of drag divergence at Ma0.7–0.8, multi-objective robust design can improve both the drag divergence property at Ma0.7–0.8 and stall property at low speed. The design cases show that the multi-objective robust design method makes the airfoil performance robust under different off-design conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Painchaud-Ouellet S, Tribes C, Trépanier J Y, et al. Airfoil shape optimization ouUsing NURBS representation under thickness constraint. AIAA 2004-1095, 2004

  2. Park G J, Lee T H, Lee K H, et al. Robust design: An overview. AIAA J, 2006, 44(1): 181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li W, Huyse L, Padula S, et al. Robust airfoil optimization to achieve consistent drag reduction over a Mach range. NASA/CR-2001-211042, 2001

  4. Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujiii K. Development of multi-objective six-sigma approach for robust design optimization. J Aerospace Comp, Inf Comm, 2008, 5(8): 215–233

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujii K. Multi-objective six sigma approach applied to robust airfoil design for Mars airplane. AIAA 2007-1966, 2007

  6. Zhong X P, Ding J F, Li W J, et al. Robust airfoil optimization with multi-objective estimation of distribution algorithm. Chinese J Aeronaut, 2008, 21(4): 289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lepine J, Guibault F, Trepanier J Y. Optimized nonuniform rational B-spline geometrical representation for aerodynamic design of wings. AIAA J, 2001, 39(11): 2033–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hager J O, Eyi S, Lee K D. Multi-point design of transonic airfoils using optimization. AIAA 92-4225, 1992

  9. Coello C, Lamont G, Veldhuizen D. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. Stanford: Springer, 2007. 62–91

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sobieczky H. Parametric airfoils and wings. Notes Num Fluid Mech, 1998, 68: 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Song W B, Keane A J. A Study of shape parameterisation methods for airfoil optimisation. AIAA 2004-4482, 2004

  13. Lepine J, Trepanier J Y. Wing aerodynamic design using an optimized NURBS geometrical representation. AIAA 2000-0699, 2000

  14. Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS Book. Berlin: Springer, 1995. 117–124

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumano T, Jesong S, Obayashi S, et al. Multidisciplinary design optimization of wing shape for a small jet aircraft using Kriging model. AIAA 2006-932, 2006

  16. Takenaka K, Obayashi S, Nakahashi K, et al. The application of MDO technologies to the design of a high performance small jet aircraft lessons learned and some practical concerns. AIAA 2005-4797, 2005

  17. Cook P H, McDonald M A, Firmin M C P. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment. AGARD Report AR 138, 1979

  18. Simpson T W, Mauery T M, Korte J J, et al. Comparison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA-98-4755, 1998

  19. Koch P N, Simpson T W, Allen J K, et al. Statistical approximations for multidisciplinary design optimization: The problem of size. J Aircraft, 1999, 36(1): 275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raymer D P. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach [M]. Washington DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989. 451–489

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harris C D. NASA supercritical airfoils. NASA Technical Paper, TP-2969, 1990

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiaoQuan Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, Y., Cheng, X., Li, Z. et al. Multi-objective robust airfoil optimization based on non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 2708–2717 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4075-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4075-4

Keywords

Navigation