Abstract
A modeling and control approach for an advanced configured large civil aircraft with aeroservoelasticity via the LQG method and control allocation is presented. Mathematical models and implementation issues for the multi-input/multi-output (MIMO) aeroservoelastic system simulation developed for a flexible wing with multi control surfaces are described. A fuzzy logic based optimization approach is employed to solve the constrained control allocation problem via intelligently adjusting the components of output vector and find a proper vector in the attainable moment set (AMS) autonomously. The basic idea is to minimize the L2 norm of error between the desired moment and achievable moment using the designing freedom provided by redundantly allocated actuators and control surfaces. Considering the constraints of control surfaces, in order to obtain acceptable performance of aircraft such as stability and maneuverability, the fuzzy weights are updated by the learning algorithm, which makes the closed-loop system self-adaptation. Finally, an application example of flight control designing for the advanced civil aircraft is discussed as a demonstration. The studies we have performed showed that the advanced configured large civil aircraft has good performance with the proper designed control law designed via the proposed approach. The gust alleviation and flutter suppression are applied with the synergetic effects of elevator, ailerons, equivalent rudders and flaps. The results show good closed loop performance and meet the requirement of constraint of control surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brockhaus R. Flight Control. Heidelberg: Springer, 1994
Wright J R, Cooper J E. Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads. New York: John Wiley, 2007
Ferreres G, Puyou G. Flight control law design for a flexible aircraft: Limits of performance. J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2006, 29: 870–878
Pratt R W, Taylor R, Caldwell B D. Aeroservoelasticity: Key issues affecting the design of flight control systems. Proceeding of CONTROL’94. 21–24 March 1994. 1522–1527
Botez R M, Grigorie L, Hiliuta A, et al. Rigid and control modes aerodynamic unsteady forces aeroservoelastic mdeling. J Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 2008, 31: 1372–1385
Burton C S, Bacon B J, Wood D V. Aeroservoelastic simulation of an active flexible wing tunnel model. NASA Technical Paper 3510, 1996
Lee H-T, Kroo I M, Bieniawski S. Flutter suppression for high aspect ratio flexible wings using micro-flaps. AIAA, 1717, 2002
Thompson P M, Klyde D H. Aeroservoelastic predictive analysis capability. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. 20–23 August 2007, Hilton Head, South Carolina. AIAA, 6716, 2007
Ameri N A, Friswell M I, Lowenberg M H. Integrated equivalent plate based aeroservoelastic models for strain actuated composite lifting surface/control surface configurations. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 17th. 4–7 May 2009, Palm Springs, California. AIAA, 2137, 2009
Page A B, Steinberg M L. Effects of control allocation algorithms on a nonlinear adaptive design. AIAA-99-4282, 1999
Bodson M. Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2001. AIAA-2001-4223
Virnig J, Bodden D. Multivariable control allocation and control law conditioning when control effectors limit. Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Paper AIAA 94-3609, Scottsdale, AZ, August 1994
Bordignon K A. Constrained control allocation for systems with redundant control effectors. Ph.D Thesis. Aerospace & Ocean Engineering, Virginia Ploytechnic Institute & State University, 1996
Enns D. Control allocation approach. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Paper AIAA 98-4109, Boston, MA, August 1998
Bodson M. Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation. J Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 2002, 25: 703–711
Burken J J, Lu P, Wu Z. Reconfigurable flight control designs with application to the X-33 vehicle. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Paper AIAA 99-4134, Porland, OR, August 1999
Petersen J A M, Bodson M. Constrained quadratic programming techniques for control allocation. Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2003. 3378–3383
Fan Y, Zhu J H, Sun Z. Fuzzy logic based constrained control allocation for an advanced fighter. Proc. of the 2006 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modeling, Control and Automation, Sydney, New South Wales Australia, November 2006
Fan Y, Zhu J H, Sun Z Q, et al. RBF neural network based constrained control allocation for an advanced fighter. Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on AI-50 Years’ Achievements, Future Directions and Social Impacts. August 1–3, 2006, Beijing, China
Fan Y, Zhu J H, Zhu J Q, et al. Genetic algorithm based constrained control allocation for tTailless fighter. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA’06), October 16–18, 2006, Jinan, Shandong, China
Fan Y, Zhu J H, Yang C N, et al. Eigenstructure assignment based flight control for advanced fighter: An optimization approach. ICNC’07-FSKD’07, 2007
Stevens B L, Lewis F L. Aircraft Control and Simulation. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, Y., Zhu, J., Hu, C. et al. Aeroservoelastic model based active control for large civil aircraft. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 1126–1137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-0001-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-0001-z