Skip to main content
Log in

Study of control effects of vortex generators on a supercritical wing

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flows around vortex generators (VGs), which serve as one of the important flow control methods, are investigated by solving Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. The influences on the main flow of VGs are intended to explore. Firstly, the flow around a single VG on a flat plane is computed to validate the schemes and to acquire basic knowledge of this kind of flow. Secondly, transonic flow past a standard model, named by ONERA-M6 wing, is predicted to investigate the flow features of shockwave/boundary-layer interactions (SWBLI). Thirdly, the effects of a row of VGs mounted about 25% local chord on a supercritical wing are analyzed in transonic condition with strong SWBLI. Lastly, VGs are mounted more upwind (about 3.5% local chord) to explore the effects at low speed and high incidence condition. The numerical results show that seven VGs can effectively suppress the separations behind the strong SWBLI and decrease spanwise flow and wing-tip vortex in transonic condition. VGs also can decrease the large scope of separation over the wing at low speed with high angle of attack.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vos J B, Rizzi A, Darracq D, et al. Navier-Stokes solvers in European aircraft design. Progr Aero Sci, 2002, 38: 601–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu G, Liu W, Mou B, et al. CFD numerical simulation investigation of vortex generators. Acta Aerodyn Sin, 2007, 25(2): 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ni Y Q. Develoment of the vortex-generator and study on the effect of vortex-generator on boundary layer. Acta Aerodyn Sin, 1995, 13: 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin J C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Progr Aero Sci, 2002, 38: 389–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yao C S, Lin J C, Allan B G. Flow-field measurement of device- induced embedded streamwise vortex on a flat plate. AIAA, 2002-3162

  6. Allan B G, Yao C S, Lin J C. Simulation of embedded streamwise vortices on a flat plate. NASA/CR-2002-211654, ICASE Report, 2002-14

  7. Jirasek A. A vortex generator model and its application to flow control. AIAA, 2004-4965

  8. Erik W, Scott T S. Numerical simulation of micro vortex generators. AIAA, 2004-2697

  9. Zhang J, Zhang B Q. Investigation of boundary layer separation control for supercritical airfoil using micro vortex generator (in Chinese). J Exp Fluid Mech, 2005, 19(3): 94–97

    Google Scholar 

  10. Valilis P S, Ekaterinaris J A. Computational investigation of flow control over wings. AIAA, 2007-477

  11. Stillfried F, Lögdberg O, Wallin S, et al. Statistical modeling of the influence of turbulent flow separation control devices. AIAA, 2009-1501

  12. Xiao Z X. Study of complex flow by solving NS equations and application of turbulence models (in Chinese). Doctoral Dissertation. Northwestern Polytech University, 2003

  13. Xiao Z X. RANS/LES hybrid method based on aircraft design (in Chinese). Postdoc Final Report. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao Z X, Chen H X, Zhang Y F, et al. Study of delayed-detached eddy simulation with weakly nonlinear turbulence model. J Aircraft, 2006, 43: 1377–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu S, Xiao Z X, Chen H X, et al. Simulation of wing-body junction flows with hybrid RANS/LES methods. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2007, 28: 1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao Z X, Zhang Y F, Huang J B, et al. Prediction of separation flows around a 6:1 prolate spheroid using RANS/LES hybrid approaches. Acta Mech Sin, 2007, 23(4): 369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao Z X, Fu S. Studies of the unsteady supersonic base flows around three afterbodies. Acta Mec Sin, 2009, 25(4): 471–479

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Soo H P, Jang H K. Implementation of k-ω turbulence models in an implicit multigrid method. AIAA J, 2004, 42(7): 1348–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Durbin P A. On the k-ɛ stagnation point anomaly. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 1996, 17(1): 89–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J, 1994, 32: 1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilcox D C. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J, 1988, 26(11): 1299–1310

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, J., Xiao, Z., Fu, S. et al. Study of control effects of vortex generators on a supercritical wing. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 2038–2048 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-3240-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-3240-0

Keywords

Navigation