Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient method for identification of risk factors

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a method to identify risk factors during bridge construction. The method integrates the concepts of analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy consistent matrix method. The advantage of the method is that instead of using 9-point scale of relative importance of the conventional analytical hierarchy process, it uses a 3-point scale to describe the scale of importance, thus greatly simplifying the identification problem of risk factors. Moreover, the difficulties of making judgment and comparison caused by uncertainty that jeopardizes the accuracy of the results in the conventional analytical hierarchy process can also be overcome. Another advantage of the method is that it does not involve consistency checking, thus saving a large amount of CPU time. It has been demonstrated with a numerical example that the proposed fuzzy analytical hierarchy process based on 3-point scale can offer significant computational savings over the conventional analytical hierarchy process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wardhana K, Hadipriono F C. Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States. J Perf Const Fac, ASCE, 2003, 17(3): 144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Linstone H A, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. London: Addison-Wesley, 1975

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2000, 70(1): 71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu Z R, Su H Z, Guo H Q. Assessment model of dam operation risk based on monitoring data. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2007, 50(Suppl): 144–152

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vaidya O S, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Euro J Oper Res, 2006, 169(1): 1–29

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Basak I. Probabilistic judgments specified partially in the analytic hierarchy process. Euro J Oper Res, 1998, 108: 153–164

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Harbi K M A. Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Proj Mgmt, 2001, 19(1): 19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao M. A kind of adaptive fuzzy system. J Contr Theory Appl, 1998, 15(3): 364–371

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gong C L. Construction risk analysis and countermeasures research of long span cable-stayed bridges (in Chinese). Dissertation od Doctroal Degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Cheng.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50408037) and the Shanghai Pujiang Program (Grant No. 09PJ1409500)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, J., Xiao, R. An efficient method for identification of risk factors. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 52, 3626–3631 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0383-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0383-y

Keywords

Navigation