Abstract
Systematic experiments were conducted on a fixed-bed reactor to investigate the interaction between fly ash and mercury, the results implied that fly ash can capture mercury effectively. Among different fly ashes, the unburned carbon in the FA2 and FA3 fly ashes has the highest mercury capture capacity, up to 10.3 and 9.36 μg/g, respectively, which is close to that of commercial activated carbon. There is no obvious relationship between mercury content and carbon content or BET surface area of fly ash. Petrography classification standard was applied to distinguish fly ash carbon particles. Carbon content is not the only variable that controls mercury capture on fly ash, there are likely significant differences in the mercury capture capacities of the various carbon forms. Mercury capture capacity mainly depends on the content of anisotropy carbon particles with porous network structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seneviratne H R, Charpenteau C, George A, et al. Ranking low cost sorbents for mercury capture from simulated flue gases. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21: 3249–3258
Zhao Y, Sun X, Xu P, et al. Mechanism of flue gas simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification using the highly reactive absorbent. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci, 2005, 48: 692–705
Hassett D J, Eylands K E. Mercury capture on coal combustion fly ash. Fuel, 1999, 78: 243–248
Dunham G E, DeWall R A, Senior C L. Fixed-bed studies of the interactions between mercury and coal combustion fly ash. Fuel Process Technol, 2003, 82: 197–213
Lopez-Anton M A, Diaz-Somoano M, Martinez-Tarazona M R. Retention of elemental mercury in fly ashes in different atmospheres. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21: 99–103
Serre S D, Silcox G D. Adsorption of elemental mercury on the residual carbon in coal fly ash. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2000, 39: 723–1730
Hower J C, Mercedes Maroto-Valer M, Taulbee D N, et al. Mercury capture by distinct fly ash carbon forms. Energy Fuels, 2000, 14: 224–226
Goodarzi F, Hower J C. Classification of carbon in Canadian fly ashes and their implications in the capture of mercury. Fuel, 2008, 87: 1949–1957
Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J. Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas. Fuel Process Technol, 2000, 65–66: 289–310
Chen L, Zhuo Y, Zhao X, et al. Thermodynamic comprehension of the effect of basic ash compositions on gaseous mercury transformation. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21: 501–505
Chen X. Impacts of fly ash composition and flue gas components on mercury speciation. Master Thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2007. 25
Ghorishi S B, Lee C W, Jozewicz W S, et al. Effects of fly ash transition metal content and flue gas HCl/SO2 ratio on mercury speciation in waste combustion. Environ Eng Sci, 2005, 22: 221–231
Zheng C, Liu J, Liu Z, et al. Kinetic mechanism studies on reactions of mercury and oxidizing species in coal combustion. Fuel, 2005, 84: 1215–1220
Zhao Y C. Partition mechanism and interaction of minerals and trace elelemnts during coal combustion (in Chinese). Doctoral Dissertation. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008. 142
Suárez-Ruiz I, Hower J C, Thomas G A. Petrology and chemistry of fly ashes derived from the combustion of complex coal blends in Spanish power plants. In: AshTech 2006—International Conference on Coal Fired Power Station Ash. Birmingham, UK, 2006. 1–16.
Hower J C, Suarez-Ruiz I, Mastalerz M. An approach toward a combined scheme for the petrographic classification of fly ash: Revision and clarification. Energy Fuels, 2005, 19: 653–655
Lopez-Anton M A, Abad-Valle P, Diaz-Somoano M, et al. The influence of carbon particle type in fly ashes on mercury adsorption. Fuel, 2009, 88: 1194–1200
Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J, Tibbetts J E, et al. Effects of NOx, α-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3, and HCl on mercury transformations in a 7-kW coal combustion system. Fuel Process Technol, 2005, 86: 429–448
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, J. et al. Experimental study on fly ash capture mercury in flue gas. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 976–983 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0367-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0367-y