Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation of micro-patterned surfaces of Si-N-O films and their influence on adhesion behavior of endothelial cells

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microgrooves were prepared on Si (100) surface by photolithography and wet etching. Subsequently, Si-N-O films were deposited on the microgrooves by unbalanced magnetron sputtering (UBMS) and micro-patterned surfaces of Si-N-O films were obtained. The size of the micropatterns was measured by surface profilometer. The chemical composition of Si-N-O films were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) and the wettability of the micropatterned surfaces was evaluated by contact angle measurement. The behavior of endothelial cells adhered on the micro-patterned surfaces, including cells adhesion, proliferation and orientation, was evaluated by cell culture test and Alamar blue assay. The results showed that the amount and activity of endothelial cells on micro-patterned samples were higher than those on flat samples. After one day’s incubation, the cells were well guided along the microgrooves. Three days later, most of the cells grew across the grooves and contacted each other. Their activity was also much higher than that on flat samples. It was suggested that the adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells could be effectively enhanced by micropattern method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Folch A, Toner M. Microengineering of celluar interactions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 2000, 2: 227–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agnese M, Alfredo P, Daniela P, et al. Cell behavior on chemically microstructured surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C, 2003, 23(3): 315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fung L Y, Yong Z. Assembly of polystyrene microspheres and its application in cell micropatterning. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(14): 2328–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshihiro I. Surface micropatterning to regulate cell functions. Biomaterials, 1999, 20(23–24): 2333–2342

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beata W S, Adam C, William M, et al. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Exp Cell Res, 1996, 223(2): 426–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Didier F, Gabor C, Grandin H M, et al. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(16): 3044–3063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mrksich M, Dike L E, Tien J, et al. Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. Exp Cell Res, 1997, 235(2): 305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel N, Bhandari R, Shakesheff K M, et al. Printing patterns of biospecifically-adsorbed protein. J Biomater Sci, Polym Ed, 2000, 11(3): 319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaidya R, Tender L M, Bradley G, et al. Computer-controlled laser ablation: A convenient and versatile tool for micropatterning biofunctional synthetic surfaces for applications in biosensing and tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog, 1998, 14(3): 371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishikawa T, Nishida J, Ookura R, et al. Mesoscopic patterning of cell adhesive substrates as novel biofunctional interfaces. Mater Sci Eng C, 1999, 10(1–2): 141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salem A K, Stevens R, Pearson R G, et al. Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. J Biomed Mate Res, 2002, 61(2): 212–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winkelmanna M, Goldb J, Hauertc R, et al. Chemically patterned, metal oxide based surfaces produced by photolithographic techniques for studying protein- and cell-surface interactions I: Microfabrication and surface characterization. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(7): 1133–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blossey R. Self-cleaning surfaces: Virtual realities. Nat Mater, 2003, 2(5): 301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohite K C, Khollam Y B, Mandale A B, et al. Characterization of silicon oxynitride thin films deposited by electron beam physical vapor deposition technique. Mater Lett, 2003, 57(26–27): 4170–4175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Poon M C, Kok C W, Wong H, et al. Bonding structures of silicon oxynitride prepared by oxidation of Si-rich silicon nitride. Thin Solid Films, 2004, 462–463: 42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. kihiro I, Abd E, Tsuyoshi F, et al. Oxynitridation of silicon with nitrogen plasma for flash memory applications characterized by high frequency capacitance-voltage measurements. Thin Solid Films, 2001, 385(1–2): 215–219

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gritsenko V A, Kwok R W M, Hei W, et al. Short-range order in non-stoichiometric amorphous silicon oxynitride and silicon-rich nitride. J Non-Cryst Solids, 2002, 297(1): 96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shima Y, Hasuyama H, Toshiharu K, et al. Mechanical properties of silicon oxynitride thin films prepared by low energy ion beam assisted deposition. Nuclear Instrum Meth B, 1999, 148(1–4): 599–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng L J, Wu X D, Lou Z, et al. Preparation of super-hydrophobic surface with micro-nanostructure. Chinese Sci Bull, 2004, 49(17): 1691–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 1936, 28(8): 988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanborna S L, Gurunathan M, Marchant R E, et al. Endothelial cell formation of focal adhesions on hydrophilic plasma polymers. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(1): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adam C, Chris W. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials, 1997, 18(24): 1573–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brunette D M, Kenner G S, Could T R. Grooved titanium surfaces orient growth and migration of cells from human gingival explants. J Dant Res, 1983, 62(10): 1045–1048

    Google Scholar 

  24. Didier F, Gabor C, Michelle H, et al. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(16): 3044–3063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu B Y, Chou P H, Sun Y M, et al. Topological micropatterned membranes and its effect on the morphology and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). J Membr Sci, 2006, 273(1–2): 31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Liu B R, Qian X P. The research on the Alamar blue assay to evaluate cell proliferation and cytotoxicity in vitro. J Modern Oncology, 2006, 14(1): 6–8

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu J, Rao M P, MacDonald N C, et al. Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4(1): 192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Yang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 30570502, 30870629).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, N., Yang, P., Wang, Q. et al. Preparation of micro-patterned surfaces of Si-N-O films and their influence on adhesion behavior of endothelial cells. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 53, 257–263 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0288-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0288-9

Keywords

Navigation