Abstract
The South Atlantic Anomaly represents a region within near-Earth space characterized by a significantly weaker geomagnetic field and a higher flux of energetic particles compared to other areas. It is a space weather hazards to Low-Earth- Orbit satellites. There has been evidence that the Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves from the powerful ground VLF radio transmitter in Australia, known as NWC, have the capacity to scatter energetic electrons’ pitch angle in the inner radiation belt. The scattering directs electrons into the drift loss cone, forms a “wisp”, characterized by its peak intensity outside the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), and a “rift” exhibiting minimal intensity within SAA. Our findings mark the initial observation of a “wisp” precipitation, an unusual occurrence with peak intensity detected inside the SAA, observed via the Macao Science Satellite-1. Enabled by the Medium-energy Electron Spectrometer onboard Macao Science Satellite-1, we were able to comprehensively measure the full pitch angle distribution at Low-Earth-Orbit. This allowed us to attribute the “wisp” within the anomaly to a specific pitch angle range just outside the drift loss cone, a measurement unattainable by previous satellites. This “wisp” occurrence aligns with previous model predictions, despite being overlooked. Moreover, we distinguished between the trapped and precipitating electron populations. Directly derived from the ratio of these populations, our analysis revealed that approximately 2%‒5% of trapped electrons will be lost in this specific wisp due to the influence of the ground VLF transmitter. Our results not only complement existing evidence of energetic electron pitch angle scattering facilitated by the ground VLF transmitter but also offer a quantitative estimation of its impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Abel B, Thorne R M. 1998. Electron scattering loss in Earth’s inner magnetosphere: 1. Dominant physical processes. J Geophys Res, 103: 2385–2396
Clilverd M A, Rodger C J, Gamble R, Meredith N P, Parrot M, Berthelier J J, Thomson N R. 2008. Ground-based transmitter signals observed from space: Ducted or nonducted?. J Geophys Res, 113: 2007JA012602
Cohen M B, Inan U S. 2012. Terrestrial VLF transmitter injection into the magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 117: 2012JA017992
Cohen M B, Lehtinen N G, Inan U S. 2012. Models of ionospheric VLF absorption of powerful ground based transmitters. Geophys Res Lett, 39: 2012GL054437
Cucinotta F A, Janssen P J. 2014. Space radiation risks for astronauts on multiple International Space Station missions. PLoS ONE, 9: e96099
Datlowe D W, Imhof W L. 1990. Cyclotron resonance precipitation of energetic electrons from the inner magnetosphere. J Geophys Res, 95: 6477–6491
Gamble R J, Rodger C J, Clilverd M A, Sauvaud J A, Thomson N R, Stewart S L, McCormick R J, Parrot M, Berthelier J J. 2008. Radiation belt electron precipitation by man-made VLF transmissions. J Geophys Res, 113: 2008JA013369
Hua M, Li W, Ni B, Ma Q, Green A, Shen X, Claudepierre S G, Bortnik J, Gu X, Fu S, Xiang Z, Reeves G D. 2020. Very-Low-Frequency transmitters bifurcate energetic electron belt in near-earth space. Nat Commun, 11: 4847
Imhof W L, Reagan J B, Voss H D, Gaines E E, Datlowe D W, Mobilia J, Helliwell R A, Inan U S, Katsufrakis J, Joiner R G. 1983. Direct observation of radiation belt electrons precipitated by the controlled injection of VLF signals from a ground-based transmitter. Geophys Res Lett, 10: 361–364
Kulkarni P, Inan U S, Bell T F, Bortnik J. 2008. Precipitation signatures of ground-based VLF transmitters. J Geophys Res, 113: 2007JA012569
Li X, Selesnick R, Mei Y, O’Brien D, Hogan B, Xiang Z, Khoo L, Zhao H, Schiller Q, Temerin M, Baker D N. 2024. First results from REPTile-2 measurements onboard CIRBE. Geophys Res Lett, 51: e2023GL107521
Ma Q, Mourenas D, Li W, Artemyev A, Thorne R M. 2017. VLF waves from ground-based transmitters observed by the Van Allen Probes: Statistical model and effects on plasmaspheric electrons. Geophys Res Lett, 44: 6483–6491
Meredith N P, Horne R B, Clilverd M A, Ross J P J. 2019. An investigation of VLF transmitter wave power in the inner radiation belt and slot region. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 124: 5246–5259
Meredith N P, Horne R B, Isles J D, Green J C. 2016. Extreme energetic electron fluxes in low Earth orbit: Analysis of POES E>30, E>100, and E>300 keV electrons. Space Weather, 14: 136–150
Ni B, Thorne R M, Shprits Y Y, Bortnik J. 2008. Resonant scattering of plasma sheet electrons by whistler-mode chorus: Contribution to diffuse auroral precipitation. Geophys Res Lett, 35: 2008GL034032
Ni B, Hua M, Gu X, Fu S, Xiang Z, Cao X, Ma X. 2022. Artificial modification of Earth’s radiation belts by ground-based very-low-frequency (VLF) transmitters. Sci China Earth Sci, 65: 391–413
Ozhogin P, Tu J, Song P, Reinisch B W. 2012. Field-aligned distribution of the plasmaspheric electron density: An empirical model derived from the IMAGE RPI measurements. J Geophys Res, 117: 2011JA017330
Sauvaud J A, Maggiolo R, Jacquey C, Parrot M, Berthelier J J, Gamble R J, Rodger C J. 2008. Radiation belt electron precipitation due to VLF transmitters: Satellite observations. Geophys Res Lett, 35: 2008GL033194
Selesnick R S, Albert J M, Starks M J. 2013. Influence of a ground-based VLF radio transmitter on the inner electron radiation belt. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 118: 628–635
Selesnick R S, Su Y J, Blake J B. 2016. Control of the innermost electron radiation belt by large-scale electric fields. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 121: 8417–8427
Shen Y, Artemyev A V, Ma Q, Zhang X J, Mourenas D, Tsai E, Wilkins C, Wu J, Angelopoulos V. 2022. Inner belt wisp precipitation measured by ELFIN: Regimes of energetic electron scattering by VLF transmitter waves. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 127: e2022JA030968
Shprits Y Y, Ni B. 2009. Dependence of the quasi-linear scattering rates on the wave normal distribution of chorus waves. J Geophys Res, 114: 2009JA014223
Stone R. 2020. U.S. military tests radiation belt cleanup in space. Science, 367: 9–10
Su Y J, Selesnick R S, Blake J B. 2016. Formation of the inner electron radiation belt by enhanced large-scale electric fields. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 121: 8508–8522
Ye Y G, Liu Y, Zou H, Zong Q G, Chen J L, Yu X Q, Shi W H, Ou J M, Liu J B, Yu L J, Zhou J, Huang H, Yuan S G, Su W, Suo L. 2024a. Mediumenergy electron spectrometers on Macao Science Satellite-1. Sci China Tech Sci, 67: 3324–3343
Ye Y G, Liu Y, Zou H, Zong Q G, Chen J L, Yu X Q, Shi W H, Ou J M, Liu J B, Sun H, Yuan S G, Su W, Suo L. 2024b. High-energy electron spectrometer on Macao Science Satellite-1. Sci China Tech Sci, 67: 3909–3924
Zou H, Li C, Zong Q, Parks G K, Pu Z, Chen H, Xie L, Zhang X. 2015. Short-term variations of the inner radiation belt in the South Atlantic anomaly. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 120: 4475–4486
Zou H, Zong Q G, Parks G K, Pu Z Y, Chen H F, Xie L. 2011. Response of high-energy protons of the inner radiation belt to large magnetic storms. J Geophys Res, 116: A10229
Zong Q G. 2024. Energetic electron dynamic in the inner radiation belt and SAA region. EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria. EGU24-18185
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the MSS mission and all collaborators who contributed to the development of the MES instrument. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42230202), the Major Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (Grant No. 2021YFA0718600), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2023M730035), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42404171).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Liu, Y., Zong, Q. et al. Radiation belt electron wisp inside South Atlantic Anomaly due to terrestrial VLF transmitter observed by MSS-1. Sci. China Earth Sci. 68, 538–548 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-024-1465-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-024-1465-x


