Skip to main content
Log in

Response of soil hydrological processes to soil rock fragments: A global Meta-analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rock fragment (RF) has been widely observed in the soil solum or on the soil surface. It regulates soil hydrological processes (SHPs) and thus has great impacts on soil and water conservation. However, responses of SHPs to RF characteristics (position, content, coverage area, mulching thickness, and size) remain unclear. Based on the dataset extracted from 168 published studies, effects of RF characteristics on SHPs (soil loss rate, evaporation rate, surface runoff rate, infiltration rate, soil water content, and soil water storage) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) were discussed in this study. Results showed that RFs completely inserted into the soil solum (CO_INS) improved the Ks by 6.9%, runoff rate by 12.8%, and soil loss rate by 22.3%, while it reduced the evaporation rate by 30.7%, infiltration rate by 15.4%, and soil water content by 9.9%. With the RF content (kg kg−1) increasing, its effects on these SHPs were strengthened. The RFs resting on the surface and partially covering soil surface (PA_COV) improved the infiltration rate but reduced the evaporation rate by 36.9%, surface runoff rate by 25.4%, and soil loss rate by 59.3%. This in turn enhanced soil water content and storage. However, as the RF coverage (% in area) increasing, the cross-sectional area of water flow decreased, and thus the infiltration rate reduced. The RFs completely mulch on the soil surface (CO_MUL) reduced the evaporation rate by 59.5% and infiltration rate by 76.5% but improved the soil water content and storage. Except the infiltration rate, the effects of CO_MUL on SHPs were strengthened as mulch thickness (cm) increased. The RFs partially embedded into soil surface (PA_EMB) promoted surface runoff rate by 15.3%, soil loss rate by 34.7%, and soil water content by 24.3%, but reduce the infiltration rate. However, the surface runoff rate was reduced at high embedded coverage due to increased tortuosity of water flow. In addition, the RF size exerted weaker effects on SHPs than RF positions, content, coverage, and mulch thickness. Our findings enhanced the understanding of SHP responses to RFs characteristics, which would be important for relate soil and water modeling and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams A D, Parsons A J. 1991. Relation between infiltration and stone cover on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona. J Hydrol, 122: 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers E, Pichault M, Pansak W, Degré A, Garré S. 2016. Characterization of stony soils’ hydraulic conductivity using laboratory and numerical experiments. Soil, 2: 421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunte K, Poesen J. 1994. Effects of rock fragment size and cover on overland flow hydraulics, local turbulence and sediment yield on an erodible soil surface. Earth Surf Proc Land, 19: 115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Casenave A, Valentin C. 1992. A runoff capability classification system based on surface features criteria in semi-arid areas of West Africa. J Hydrol, 130: 231–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H S, Liu J W, Wang K L, Zhang W. 2011. Spatial distribution of rock fragments on steep hillslopes in karst region of northwest Guangxi, China. Catena, 84: 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousin I, Nicoullaud B, Coutadeur C. 2003. Influence of rock fragments on the water retention and water percolation in a calcareous soil. Catena, 53: 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuniglio R, Corti G, Agnelli A. 2009. Rock fragments evolution and nutrients release in vineyard soils developed on a thinly layered limestone (Tuscany, Italy). Geoderma, 148: 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Z Y, Cai Y J, Yan Y, Wang X D. 2017. Embedded rock fragments affect alpine steppe plant growth, soil carbon and nitrogen in the northern Tibetan Plateau. Plant Soil, 420: 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiès J C, De Louvigny N, Chanzy A. 2002. The role of stones in soil water retention. Eur J Soil Sci, 53: 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • de Figueiredo T, Poesen J. 1998. Effects of surface rock fragment characteristics on interrill runoff and erosion of a silty loam soil. Soil Tillage Res, 46: 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo L, Mele G, Terribile F. 2015. The role of rock fragments in crack and soil structure development: A laboratory experiment with a Vertisol. Eur J Soil Sci, 66: 757–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordillo-Rivero Á J, García-Moreno J, Jordán A, Zavala L M, Granja-Martins F M. 2014. Fire severity and surface rock fragments cause patchy distribution of soil water repellency and infiltration rates after burning. Hydrol Process, 28: 5832–5843

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo T L, Wang Q J, Li D Q, Zhuang J. 2010. Effect of surface stone cover on sediment and solute transport on the slope of fallow land in the semiarid loess region of northwestern China. J Soil Sediment, 10: 1200–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Wang X Y, Li X X. 2017. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological processes in purple soils (in Chinese). Mt Res, 35: 451–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváčiková H, Novák V, Holko L. 2015. On the role of rock fragments and initial soil water content in the potential subsurface runoff formation. J Hydrol HydroMech, 63: 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváčiková H, Novák V, Šimůnek J. 2016. The effects of rock fragment shapes and positions on modeled hydraulic conductivities of stony soils. Geoderma, 281: 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu T F, Wang H, Hu C W, He X J, Liu H T. 2019. Effect of thickness of gravel cover on infiltration characteristics of water repellent soils and its model optimization (in Chinese). J Soil Water Conserv, 33: 17–22, 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilek A, Kucza J, Witek W. 2019. Using undisturbed soil samples to study how rock fragments and soil macropores affect the hydraulic conductivity of forest stony soils: Some methodological aspects. J Hydrol, 570: 132–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki M N. 2012. How does a stone mulch increase transpiration and grain yield in wheat under soil water deficit stress? Cereal Res Commun, 40: 486–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomaa S, Barry D A, Brovelli A, Heng B C P, Sander G C, Parlange J Y, Rose C W. 2012. Rain splash soil erosion estimation in the presence of rock fragments. Catena, 92: 38–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Katra I, Lavee H, Sarah P. 2008. The effect of rock fragment size and position on topsoil moisture on arid and semi-arid hillslopes. Catena, 72: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Khetdan C, Chittamart N, Tawornpruek S, Kongkaew T, Onsamrarn W, Garré S. 2017. Influence of rock fragments on hydraulic properties of Ultisols in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. Geoderma Regional, 10: 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Khorsandi F. 2011. Soil water conservation by course textured volcanic rock mulch. Asian J Exp Biol Sci, 2: 762–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai X M, Liu Y, Li L Y, Zhu Q, Liao K H. 2022a. Spatial variation of global surface soil rock fragment content and its roles on hydrological and ecological patterns. Catena, 208: 105752

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai X M, Zhu Q, Castellano M J, Liao K H. 2022b. Soil rock fragments: Unquantified players in terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles. Geoderma, 406: 115530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai X M, Zhu Q, Zhou Z W, Liao K H. 2018. Rock fragment and spatial variation of soil hydraulic parameters are necessary on soil water simulation on the stony-soil hillslope. J Hydrol, 565: 354–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D D, She D L. 2017. Can rock fragment cover maintain soil and water for saline-sodic soil slopes under coastal reclamation? Catena, 151: 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna L, Vignozzi N, Miralles I, Solé-Benet A. 2018. Organic amendments and mulches modify soil porosity and infiltration in semiarid mine soils. Land Degrad Dev, 29: 1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv G, Wan L, Lu X P, Li Y X, Liu Y Z. 2017. The effect of gravel on saturated hydraulic conductivity and water storage capacity in reclaimed dump relative to reclamation mode (in Chinese). Acta Pedol Sin, 54: 1414–1426

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv J R, Luo H, Xie Y S. 2019. Effects of rock fragment content, size and cover on soil erosion dynamics of spoil heaps through multiple rainfall events. Catena, 172: 179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv J R, Luo H, Xie Y S. 2020. Impact of rock fragment size on erosion process and micro-topography evolution of cone-shaped spoil heaps. Geomorphology, 350: 106936

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma D H, Shao M A, Zhang J B, Wang Q J. 2010. Validation of an analytical method for determining soil hydraulic properties of stony soils using experimental data. Geoderma, 159: 262–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma D H, Shao M A. 2008. Simulating infiltration into stony soils with a dual-porosity model. Eur J Soil Sci, 59: 950–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal U K, Rao K V, Mishra P K, Vittal K P R, Sharma K L, Narsimlu B, Venkanna K. 2005. Soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield from a shallow soil with varied stone cover and intensity of rain. Eur J Soil Sci, 56: 435–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J A, Sklar L S. 2012. Mining soil databases for landscape-scale patterns in the abundance and size distribution of hillslope rock fragments. Earth Surf Proc Land, 37: 287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller F T, Guthrie R L. 1984. Classification and distribution of soils containing rock fragments in the United States. In: Nichols J D, Brown P L, Grant W J, eds. Erosion and Productivity of Soils Containing Rock Fragments. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, Luo K. 2019. Effect of rock fragment content on erosion processes of disturbed soil accumulation under field scouring conditions. J Soil Sediment, 19: 1708–1723

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák V, Kňava K, Šimůnek J. 2011. Determining the influence of stones on hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils using numerical method. Geoderma, 161: 177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssen J, Haile M, Poesen J, Deckers J, Moeyersons J. 2001. Removal of rock fragments and its effect on soil loss and crop yield, Tigray, Ethiopia. Soil Use Manage, 17: 179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez F L. 1998. Conservation of soil moisture by different stone covers on alpine talus slopes (Lassen, California). Catena, 33: 155–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J D, Luckow K, Marion D A, Adams K R. 2005. Rock fragment distributions and regolith evolution in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, USA. Earth Surf Proc Land, 30: 429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J W A, Lavee H. 1991. Effects of size and incorporation of synthetic mulch on runoff and sediment yield from interrils in a laboratory study with simulated rainfall. Soil Tillage Res, 21: 209–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Lavee H. 1994. Rock fragments in top soils: Significance and processes. Catena, 23: 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Y, Lv W C, Wang X P, Wang Y J, Li J, Xie Z K. 2021. Runoff and soil and nutrient losses from gravel mulching: A field experiment with natural rainfall on the Loess Plateau of China. J Soil Water Conservation, 76: 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Y, Lv W C, Wang X P, Xie Z K, Wang Y J. 2020. Long-term effects of gravel mulching and straw mulching on soil physicochemical properties and bacterial and fungal community composition in the Loess Plateau of China. Eur J Soil Biol, 98: 103188

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Y, Xie Z K, Wang Y J, Ren J, Malhi S S. 2014. Influence of gravel mulch stratum thickness and gravel grain size on evaporation resistance. J Hydrol, 519: 1908–1913

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Y, Xie Z K, Wang Y J. 2018. Influence of gravel mulch on rainfall interception under simulated rainfall. Soil Water Res, 13: 115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke-Zapp D, Poesen J, Nearing M A. 2007. Effects of rock fragments incorporated in the soil matrix on concentrated flow hydraulics and erosion. Earth Surf Proc Land, 32: 1063–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer T J, Logsdon S D. 2002. Hydraulic and physical properties of stony soils in a small watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 66: 1947–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekucia F, Dlapa P, Kollár J, Cerdá A, Hrabovský A, Svobodová L. 2020. Land-use impact on porosity and water retention of soils rich in rock fragments. Catena, 195: 104807

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z J, Xu L H, Wang Y H, Yang X H, Jia Z Q, Guo H, Xiong W, Yu P T. 2012. Effect of rock fragments on macropores and water effluent in a forest soil in the stony mountains of the Loess Plateau, China. Afr J Biotechnol, 11: 9350–9361

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanton J R, Toy T J. 1994. The relation between surface rock-fragment cover and semiarid hillslope profile morphology. Catena, 23: 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H Y, Shao L W, Liu X W, Miao W F, Chen S Y, Zhang X Y. 2012. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. Eur J Agron, 43: 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang S Q, She D L. 2018. Synergistic effects of rock fragment cover and polyacrylamide application on erosion of saline-sodic soils. Catena, 171: 154–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetegan M, Korboulewsky N, Bouthier A, Samouëlian A, Cousin I. 2015. The role of pebbles in the water dynamics of a stony soil cultivated with young poplars. Plant Soil, 391: 307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetegan M, Nicoullaud B, Baize D, Bouthier A, Cousin I. 2011. The contribution of rock fragments to the available water content of stony soils: Proposition of new pedotransfer functions. Geoderma, 165: 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornes J B, Francis C F, Bermudez F L, Diaz A R. 1990. Strategies to Combat Desertification in Mediterranean Europe. Brussels: Commission for the European Communities. 229

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbist K, Baetens J, Cornelis W M, Gabriels D, Torres C, Soto G. 2009. Hydraulic conductivity as influenced by stoniness in degraded drylands of Chile. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 73: 471–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B C, Lajeunesse M J, Dietz G, Dahabreh I J, Trikalinos T A, Schmid C H, Gurevitch J. 2017. OpenMEE: Intuitive, open-source software for meta-analysis in ecology and evolutionary biology. Methods Ecol Evol, 8: 941–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D J, Zhao W Z, Zhou H, Luo W C, Liu H. 2021. Mosaic desert pavement influences water infiltration and vegetation distribution on fluvial fan surfaces. Hydrol Process, 35: e14373

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Zhang X Y, Li G L, Ma J B, Zhang S Q, Zheng J Y. 2021. Effect of using an infiltration hole and mulching in fish-scale pits on soil water, nitrogen, and organic matter contents: Evidence from a 4-year field experiment. Land Degrad Dev, 32: 4203–4211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X L, Meng Z J, Dang X H, Wang J. 2021. Effects of rock fragments on the water infiltration and hydraulic conductivity in the soils of the desert steppes of Inner Mongolia, China. Soil Water Res, 16: 151–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Song X Y, Fu N, Cui S Y, Li L J, Li H Y, Li Y L. 2018. Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological processes under rainfall simulation in a semi-arid region of China. Hydrol Process, 32: 792–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Z K, Wang Y J, Jiang W L, Wei X H. 2006. Evaporation and evapotranspiration in a watermelon field mulched with gravel of different sizes in northwest China. Agric Water Manage, 81: 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka T, Inoue M, Kaihotsu I. 2004. Effects of gravel mulch on water vapor transfer above and below the soil surface. Agric Water Manage, 67: 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan C P, Lei T W, Mao L L, Liu H, Wu Y. 2009. Soil surface evaporation processes under mulches of different sized gravel. Catena, 78: 117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavala L M, Jordán A, Bellinfante N, Gil J. 2010. Relationships between rock fragment cover and soil hydrological response in a Mediterranean environment. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 56: 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan Z Z, Huang Y H, Jiang F S, Lin J S, Li X B, Wang X Y, Cai J X. 2017. Effects of content and size of gravel on soil permeability of the colluvial deposit in Benggang (in Chinese). J Soil Water Conserv, 31: 85–90, 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y H, Zhang M X, Niu J Z, Li H L, Xiao R, Zheng H J, Bech J. 2016. Rock fragments and soil hydrological processes: Significance and progress. Catena, 147: 153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Wang Y N, Liu H P. 2013. Effect of rock fragment coverage and content on soil moisture of farmland in loess plateau (in Chinese). J Henan Agr Sci, 42: 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W J, Cui Z, Zhou C Q. 2020. Spatiotemporal variability of soil-water content at different depths in fields mulched with gravel for different planting years. J Hydrol, 590: 125253

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y P, Bai Y R, Wang Y Q, Yang C X. 2017. Investigating and modeling soil infiltration process with gravel mulch on urban green space (in Chinese). J Northwest A F Univ-Nat Sci Ed, 45: 66–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42125103 & 42271061), and the Frontier and Fundamental Research Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qing Zhu or Xiaoming Lai.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zhu, Q., Lai, X. et al. Response of soil hydrological processes to soil rock fragments: A global Meta-analysis. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66, 2066–2080 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1132-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1132-4

Keywords

Navigation