Abstract
Due to the coarse temporal resolution of the best track databases for typhoons, some small-scale characteristics of typhoon motion have been neglected. In order to reveal the fine features of typhoon motion, the dense cloud within the radius of maximum wind (RMW) of mature typhoons, defined as a “cloud gyro” that simultaneously spins around its own rotational axis and precesses around the vertical axis, is approximated to a rigid body. Based on the principles of gyrodynamics, the derived mathematical model of a typhoon track indicates that typhoon movement is composed of translational motion governed by the steering flow and superimposed precessional motion that manifests as the inherent characteristics of typhoon tracks, especially with the external torque. High temporal resolution numerical simulation of a real case verifies the conclusion of this study, which is that the smaller the RMW, the larger the tangential wind speed or the larger the external torque, and the more obviously precessional motion manifests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biswas M K, Stark D, Carson L. 2018. GFDL Vortex Tracker Users Guide Version 3.9a
Chan J C L. 2005. The physics of tropical cyclone motion. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 37: 99–128
Chan J C L. 1984. An observational study of the physical processes responsible for tropical cyclone motion. J Atmos Sci, 41: 1036–1048
Chan J C L, Ko F M F, Lei Y M. 2002. Relationship between potential vorticity tendency and tropical cyclone motion. J Atmos Sci, 59: 1317–1336
Emanuel K A. 1991. The theory of hurricanes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 23: 179–196
Holland G J. 1983. Tropical cyclone motion: Environmental interaction plus a beta effect. J Atmos Sci, 40: 328–342
Landsea C W, Cangialosi J P. 2018. Have we reached the limits of predictability for tropical cyclone track forecasting? Bull Amer Meteorol Soc, 99: 2237–2243
Liu D, Pang L, Xie B. 2009. Typhoon disaster in China: Prediction, prevention, and mitigation. Nat Hazards, 49: 421–436
Liu Y Z. 2009. Gyroscopic Mechanics (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press. 4–13
Niu X X. 1992. Tropical Cyclone Dynamics (in Chinese). Beijing: China Meteorological Press. 138–140
van Nguyen H, Chen Y L. 2011. High-resolution initialization and simulations of typhoon Morakot (2009). Mon Weather Rev, 139: 1463–1491
Nolan D S, Atlas R, Bhatia K T, Bucci L R. 2013. Development and validation of a hurricane nature run using the joint OSSE nature run and the WRF model. J Adv Model Earth Syst, 5: 382–405
Peng X, Fei J, Huang X, Cheng X. 2017. Evaluation and error analysis of official forecasts of tropical cyclones during 2005-14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks. Weather Forecast, 32: 689–712
Tao D, Zhang F. 2014. Effect of environmental shear, sea-surface temperature, and ambient moisture on the formation and predictability of tropical cyclones: An ensemble-mean perspective. J Adv Model Earth Syst, 6: 384–404
Wu H Q. 1989. Discuss the motion of the typhoon track using gyro precession theory (in Chinese). Guangxi Meteorol, 4: 1–6
Wu C C, Emanuel K A. 1993. Interaction of a baroclinic vortex with background shear: Application to hurricane movement. J Atmos Sci, 50: 62–76
Wu L G, Wang B. 2000. A potential vorticity tendency diagnostic approach for tropical cyclone motion. Mon Weather Rev, 128: 1899–1911
Wang Y, Holland G J. 1996. The beta drift of baroclinic vortices. Part II: Diabatic vortices. J Atmos Sci, 53: 3737–3756
Zhang F, Tao D. 2013. Effects of vertical wind shear on the predictability of tropical cyclones. J Atmos Sci, 70: 975–983
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41675058 & 41775055).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Li, X., Cheng, X. et al. Mature typhoon “cloud gyro” model and numerical simulation study. Sci. China Earth Sci. 63, 749–756 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9523-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9523-6