Abstract
Although the Arctic methane reservoir is large, the emission of methane from the Arctic Ocean into the atmosphere remains poorly constrained. Continuous ship-borne measurements of atmospheric methane near the surface ocean were carried out during two cruises to investigate methane emission from the Arctic Ocean up to the latitude of 87ºN. Three-day air mass back trajectories along the cruise tracks indicated that the surface Arctic Ocean could be a potentially important source of methane to the atmosphere. Rapid bursts in methane concentration occurred mainly along the ocean frontal area, suggesting that frontal upwelling in the upper layer of the Arctic Ocean might contribute to methane emissions into the atmosphere.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Damm E, Helmke E, Thoms S, Schauer U, Nöthig E, Bakker K, Kiene R P. 2010. Methane production in aerobic oligotrophic surface water in the central Arctic Ocean. Biogeosciences, 7: 1099–1108
Damm E, Thoms S, Kattner G, Beszczynska-Möller A, Nöthig E M, Stimac I. 2011. Coexisting methane and oxygen excesses in nitrate-limited polar water (Fram Strait) during ongoing sea ice melting. Biogeosciences Discuss, 8: 5179–5195
Dlugokencky E J, Nisbet E G, Fisher R, Lowry D. 2011. Global atmospheric methane: Budget, changes and dangers. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 369: 2058–2072
Draxler R R, Stunder B, Rolph G, Taylor A. 1999. HYSPLIT4 user’s guide. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL ARL-230, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD
Draxler R R, Hess G D. 1998. An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system of trajectories, dispersion, and deposition. Aus Meteor Mag, 47: 295–308
Fisher R E, Sriskantharajah S, Lowry D, Lanoisellé M, Fowler C M R, James R H, Hermansen O, Lund Myhre C, Stohl A, Greinert J, Nisbet-Jones P B R, Mienert J, Nisbet E G. 2011. Arctic methane sources: Isotopic evidence for atmospheric inputs. Geophys Res Lett, 38: L21803
Gautier D L, Bird K J, Charpentier R R, Grantz A, Houseknecht D W, Klett T R, Moore T E, Pitman J K, Schenk C J, Schuenemeyer J H, Sorensen K, Tennyson M E, Valin Z C, Wandrey C J. 2009. Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Arctic. Science, 324: 1175–1179
Isaksen I S A, Gauss M, Myhre G, Walter Anthony K M, Ruppel C. 2011. Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions. Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 25: GB2002
Kitidis V, Upstill-Goddard R C, Anderson L G. 2010. Methane and nitrous oxide in surface water along the North-West Passage, Arctic Ocean. Mar Chem, 121: 80–86
Kort E A, Wofsy S C, Daube B C, Diao M, Elkins J W, Gao R S, Hintsa E J, Hurst D F, Jimenez R, Moore F L, Spackman J R, Zondlo M A. 2012. Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north. Nat Geosci, 5: 318–321
Lü X, Qiao F, Xia C, Zhu J, Yuan Y. 2006. Upwelling off Yangtze River estuary in summer. J Geophys Res, 111: C11S08
Mastepanov M, Sigsgaard C, Dlugokencky E J, Houweling S, Ström L, Tamstorf M P, Christensen T R. 2008. Large tundra methane burst during onset of freezing. Nature, 456: 628–630
Morimoto S, Aoki S, Nakazawa T, Yamanouchi T. 2006. Temporal variations of the carbon isotopic ratio of atmospheric methane observed at Ny Ålesund, Svalbard from 1996 to 2004. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L01807
Nisbet E G, Chappellaz J. 2009. Shifting gear, quickly. Science, 324: 477–478
O’Connor F M, Boucher O, Gedney N, Jones C D, Folberth G A, Coppell R, Friedlingstein P, Collins W J, Chappellaz J, Ridley J, Johnson C E. 2010. Possible role of wetlands, permafrost, and methane hydrates in the methane cycle under future climate change: A review. Rev Geophys, 48: RG4005
Pabi S, van Dijken G L, Arrigo K R. 2008. Primary production in the Arctic Ocean, 1998–2006. J Geophys Res, 113: C08005
Shakhova N, Semiletov I. 2007. Methane release and coastal environment in the East Siberian Arctic shelf. J Mar Syst, 66: 227–243
Shakhova N. 2005. The distribution of methane on the Siberian Arctic shelves: Implications for the marine methane cycle. Geophys Res Lett, 32: L09601
Shakhova N, Semiletov I, Leifer I, Salyuk A, Rekant P, Kosmach D. 2010a. Geochemical and geophysical evidence of methane release over the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. J Geophys Res, 115: C08007
Shakhova N, Semiletov I, Salyuk A, Yusupov V, Kosmach D, Gustafsson O. 2010b. Extensive methane venting to the atmosphere from sediments of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Science, 327: 1246–1250
Shakhova N, Semiletov I, Sergienko V, Lobkovsky L, Yusupov V, Salyuk A, Salomatin A, Chernykh D, Kosmach D, Panteleev G, Nicolsky D, Samarkin V, Joye S, Charkin A, Dudarev O, Meluzov A, Gustafsson O. 2015. The East Siberian Arctic Shelf: Towards further assessment of permafrost-related methane fluxes and role of sea ice. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 373: 20140451
IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M, Miller H L, eds. The physical science basis: Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 235–337
Walter K M, Zimov S A, Chanton J P, Verbyla D, Chapin F S. 2006. Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming. Nature, 443: 71–75
Whiteman G, Hope C, Wadhams P. 2013. Climate science: Vast costs of Arctic change. Nature, 499: 401–403
Acknowledgments
We thank Liu Yanguang, Ge Renfeng and Lin Lina for their help in data acquisition. This work was supported by the Project of Comprehensive Evaluation of Polar Areas on Global and Regional Climate Changes (Grant No. CHINARE2012-04-04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41206027), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers (Grant No. U14064) and the Polar Strategic Research Foundation of China (Grant No. 20120103).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, M., Qiao, F. & Song, Z. Observation of atmospheric methane in the Arctic Ocean up to 87° north. Sci. China Earth Sci. 60, 173–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-0241-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-0241-3