Science China Earth Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 731–740 | Cite as

Wide area real time kinematic decimetre positioning with multiple carrier GNSS signals

  • YanMing Feng
  • BoFeng LiEmail author
Research Paper


This paper presents the technical basis for wide area real time decimetre positioning services using multiple carrier signals transmitted by future GNSS such as modernized GPS and Compass systems. The first step is to form two ionosphere-reduced extra-widelanes (EWL) that have the minimal total noise levels in cycles, considering the effects of the ionospheric and tropospheric delays, orbital error, and phase noise terms in various observational environments. The proposed three carrier ambiguity resolution approach can determine the integer ambiguities of the selected EWL signals with geometry-free and geometry-based estimations respectively over the distances of typically hundreds of kilometres. With two ambiguity-fixed EWL signals, the kinematic positioning solutions can be achieved in decimetre level accuracy. A semi-simulation method is employed to generate three frequency Compass data to demonstrate the above expected performance for decimetre positioning services. Both theoretical and experimental results have demonstrated the overall 3D root mean square accuracy of better than 15 cm obtained through with a phase smoothing process over 120 epochs. The dominating error factor in this positioning result is the residual tropospheric biases, which would become less correlated as the baselines grow beyond hundreds of kilometres. With respect to dual-frequency based precise point positioning and wide area differential positioning solutions, a major advantage of using the third frequency signals is the convergence time being shorten from tens of minutes to a few minutes. In addition, due to the instant ambiguity resolution capability, phase breaks or cycle slips no longer affect the continuity of the solutions. This reliable decimetre positioning capability introduces a significant improvement to safety-of-life, liability-critical and professional applications.


GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution real time kinematic decimetre positioning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Forssell B, Martin-Neira M, Harris R. Carrier phase ambiguity resolution in GNSS-2. In: Proceedings of ION GPS. Kansas City, MO., September 16–19, 1997. 1727–1736Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vollath U, Birnbach S, Landau H. Analysis of three carrier ambiguity resolution (TCAR) technique for precise relative positioning in GNSS-2. In: Proceedings of ION GPS. September 15–18, 1998. 417–426Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han S, Rizos C. The impact of two additional civilian GPS frequencies on ambiguity resolutions strategies. In: Proceedings of ION Annual Technical Meeting. Cambridge, MA., June 28–30, 1999. 315–321Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Jonge P, Teunissen P, Jonkman N, et al. The distributional dependence of the range on triple frequency GPS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION NTM. Anaheim, CA, January 26–28, 2000. 605–612Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hatch R, Jung J, Enge P, et al. Civilian GPS: The benefits of three frequencies. GPS Solut, 2000, 3: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng Y M, Rizos C. Three carrier approaches for future global, regional and local GNSS positioning services: Concepts and performance perspectives. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS. Long Beach, CA, September 13–16, 2005. 2277–2787Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hatch R. A new three-frequency, geometry-free technique for ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS. Fort Worth, TX. September 26–29, 2006. 309–316Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feng Y M. GNSS three carrier ambiguity resolution using ionosphere-reduced virtual signals. J Geodesy, 2008, 82: 847–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li B F. Generation of third code and phase signals based on dual-frequency GPS measurements. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS. Savannah GA, September 16–19, 2008. 2820–2830Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feng Y M, Li B F. A benefit of multiple carrier GNSS signals: Regional scale network-based RTK with doubled inter-station distances. J Spatial Sci, 2008, 53: 135–147Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng Y M, Rizos C. Network-based geometry-free three carrier ambiguity resolution and phase bias calibration. GPS Solut, 2009, 13: 43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li B F, Feng Y M, Shen Y Z. Three carrier ambiguity resolution: Distance-independent performance demonstrated using semi-generated triple frequency GPS signals. GPS Solut, 2010, 14: 174–184Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao Y, Chen K. Performance analysis of precise point positioning using real-time orbit and clock products. J GPS, 2005, 3: 95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mirsa P, Enge P. Global Positioning Systems, Signals, Measurements and Performance. Lincoln: Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2004. 227–254Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Odijk D. Ionosphere-free combinations for modernized GPS. J Surv Eng, 2003, 129: 165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zheng Y, Feng Y. Interpolating residual zenith tropospheric delays for improved regional area differential GPS positioning. Navigation, 2005, 50: 179–187Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collins J, Langley B A. Tropospheric Delay Model for the User of the Wide Area Augmentation System. Technical Report No.187. Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, 1997Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyQueensland University of TechnologyQueenslandAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Surveying and Geo-informatics EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations