Skip to main content
Log in

Geochemical study on oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases (II)—Discrimination methods between oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases

  • Published:
Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the processes of discrimination between oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases, Behar and Pinzgofer et al.’s results were adopted in the former researches, in which the ratio of C2/C3 is basically a constant while the ratio of C1/C2 gradually increases in the course of primary cracking of kerogen. Otherwise in the course of secondary cracking of oil, the ratio of C2/C3 increases rapidly while C1/C2 keeps relatively stable. Our study on analogue experiment shows that, whether it is oil or kerogen, in its process of gas generating by cracking, the ratios of C2/C3, C1/C2 or C1/C3 will all be increased with the growth of thermal conditions. In comparison, the ratio of C2/C3, which is affected by genetic type to some comparatively less extent, mainly responds to the maturity of gases, while the value of C2/C3 is about 2, and that of C2/iC4 is about 10, and the corresponding value of R o is about 1.5%–1.6%. The influence of gas source on C2/C3 is less than that of gas maturity, otherwise C1/C2 (or C1/C3) is obviously affected by cracking matrices. The ratios of C1/C2, C1/C3 of oil-cracked gases are less than that of kerogen-cracked gases, under the condition that the ratios of C2/C3 are similar in value, so are the value of dryness indexes. There exists wide diffidence between this view and the former discrimination method in theory. The analysis of the spot sample indicates that we can apply the above basic view to dealing efficiently with the problem of the discrimination between oil-cracked gas and kerogen-cracked gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behar F, Kressmann S, Rudkiewicz J L. Experimental simulation in a confined system and kinetic modeling of kerogen and oil cracking. Simulat Model Kerogen Oil Crack, 1992, 19(1–3): 173–189

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hill R J, Tang Y C, Kaplan I R. Insights into oil cracking based on laboratory experiments. Org Geochem, 2003, 34: 1651–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinzhofer A, Huc A Y. Genetic and post genetic molecular and isotopic fractionations in natural gases. Chem Geol, 1995, 126: 281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z P, Fu X T, Lu S F, et al. An analogue experiment of gas generating by crude oil craking, characters of products and its significance (in Chinese). Nat Gas Indust, 2001, 21(3): 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pepper A S, Dodd T A. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part II: oil-gas cracking. Marine Petrol Geol, 1995, 12: 321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao M J, Lu S F. Natural gas from secondary cracking of crude oil—An important pattern of gas generation (in Chinese). Geol Rev, 2000, 46(6): 645–650

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao M J, Zeng F G, Qin S F, et al. Two pyrolytic gases found and proved in Tarim Basin (in Chinese). Nat Gas Indust, 2001, 21(1): 35–38

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen S J, Fu X W, Ma L N, et al. Genetic identification method of kerogen-cracked gases and oil-cracked gases (in Chinese). Experim Petrol Geol, 2002, 24(4): 364–371

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao M J, Zhang S C, Liao Z Q. The cracking gas from crude oil and its significance in gas exploration (in Chinese). Petrol Explor Devel, 2001, 28(44): 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu G Y, Xiao Z Y, Luo X, et al. Light hydrocarbon composition difference between two kinds of cracked gases and its application (in Chinese). Nat Gas Indust, 2005, 25(9): 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu G Y, Xiao Z Y, Luo X, et al. The comparison of gas generation potential and model between two different thermal simulation systems (in Chinese). Acta Sedimentol Sin, 2004, 24(4): 718–723

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao W Z, Wang Z Y, Zhang S C, et al. Successive generation of natural gas from organic materials and its significance in future exploration. Petrol Explor Devel (in Chinese), 2005, 32(2): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yin C H, Wang T D, Wang S Y, et al. Differences between kerogen and oil cracked gases in Sinian Reservoirs of Weiyuan and Ziyang Area (in Chinese). Acta Sedimentol Sin, 2001, 19(1): 156–160

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hou D J, Xiao Z Y, Tang Y J, et al. Geochemical characterization of mixing natural gas in Kekeya Field, Tarim Basin, China (in Chinese). Nat Gas Geosci, 2003, 14(6): 474–479

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hou D J, Zhao Z Y, Tang Y J, et al. The geological and geochemical characteristics of oil cracked gas in Kekeya region, Tarim basin (in Chinese). Nat Gas Geosci, 2004, 15(2): 137–141

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao Z Y, Lu Y H, Wu Y, et al. Priliminary study on nature gas genesis and pool-forming period in the Silurian of Madong 1, east Tarim Basin (in Chinese). Chinese J Geol, 2005, 42(2): 262–273

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qin S F, Li M, Dai J X, et al. Types of cracking gas in Hetianhe gas field in Tarim Basin (in Chinese). Oil Gas Geol, 2005, 26(4): 455–460

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang M, Huang G H, Hu G Y, et al. Geochemical study on oil-cracked gas and kerogen-cracked gas (I)—Experimental simulation and products analysis. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2009, 52(Supp. I): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian H. Wang Z M, Xiao Z Y, et al. Oil cracking to gases: Kinetic modeling and geological significance. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51(22): 2763–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xie Z Y, Tian S C, Li J, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin of Feixianguan Formation oolitic shoal natural gases in northeastern Sichuan Basin (in Chinese). Geochimica, 2004, 33(6): 567–572

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cai C F, Worden R H, Wolff G A, et al. Origin of sulfur rich oils and H2S in Tertiary lacustrine sections of the Jinxian Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Appl Geochem 2005, 20(7): 1427–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai C F, Worden R H, Wang Q H, et al. Chemical and isotopic evidence for secondary alteration of natural gases in the Hetianhe Field, Bachu Uplift of the Tarim Basin. Org Geochem, 2002, 43: 1415–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cai C F, Hu W S, Worden R H. Thermochemical sulphate reduction in Cambro-Ordovician carbonates in Central Tarim. Marine Petrol Geol, 2001, 18: 729–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuangHui Huang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Key Science and Technology Program of China during the 10th Five-Year Plan Period (Grant No. 2004BA616A02-01-01-03)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, G., Zhang, M., Hu, G. et al. Geochemical study on oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases (II)—Discrimination methods between oil-cracked gases and kerogen-cracked gases. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 52 (Suppl 1), 10–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-5020-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-5020-x

Keywords

Navigation