Abstract
In 2005 China carried out a new geodetic campaign for the height determination of Qomolangma Feng—Mt. Everest (QF in short). The technical progresses in geodesy for the 2005 campaign are presented in the paper. GPS positioning was the key technique in the campaign. After summarizing the experiences and lessons of the GPS positioning on the QF summit in the previous QF height determination campaigns, some measures were taken to raise the accuracy and reliability of the height determination with GPS techniques. In order to raise the accuracy of the height determination of the QF summit with classical geodetic techniques, laser ranging was used together with the trigonometric levelling in the 2005 campaign. It is the first time in China the thickness of the ice-snow layer on the QF summit was measured by ground penetrating radar integrated with GPS. The local gravity field and geoid in the QF area was improved on the basis of earth gravity field model integrated with new ground gravity data, DTM data and GPS leveling data in the QF area. In the 2005 campaign the normal height and orthometric height (height above sea level) of the snow surface of the QF summit were obtained as 8846.67 m and 8847.93 m respectively. The orthometric height of the rock surface of the QF summit is 8844.43 m, and the thickness of the ice-snow layer on the QF summit is 3.50 m.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Molnar, P., Caen, H. L., Fault plane solutions of earthquakes and active tectonics of the Tibetan Plateau and its margins, Geophys. J. Int., 1989, 123.
Zhu Wenyao, Cheng Zongyi, Xiong Yongqing et al., Preliminary results of measuring the crustal deformation in Qinghai-Tibet area using GPS technique, Science in China, Ser. D. 1998, 41(3): 314–138.
Angusleppan, P. V., The height of Mt. Everest, Survey Rev., 1982, (26): 367–385.
Gulatee, B. L., The height of Mt. Everest: A new determination (1952–1954), New Deli: Survey of India, 1954.
Poretti, G., Marchesinie, C., Beinat, A., GPS surveys Mount Everest, GPS World, 1994, (10): 32–44.
Washburn, B., New official height of Everest, National Geographic, 1999, (11): 76.
Chen Junyong, Pang Shangyi, Zhang Ji et al., The height determination of Qomolangma Peak in China: review and analysis, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica (in Chinese), 2001, 30(1): 1–5.
Chen Junyong, Height determination for Qomolangma Peak, Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (in Chinese), 1975, (4): 19–27.
Zhu Liang, The height determination of Mt. Everest, Science in China (Scientia Sinica) (in Chinese), 1976 (2): 74–77.
Chen, J. Y., Gu D. S., A new determination of the height of the world’s highest peak, OZfV, 1980, (1): 1–6.
Chen Junyong, Zhang Ji, Liu Yongruo et al., A newest high determination of Qomolangma Feng, Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (in Chinese), 1993, (6): 3–6.
Chen, J. Y., The newest height determination for the world’s highest peak: Mt. Everest, Bull. Di Geod. E. Scien. Affini, 1994, (4): 367–374.
Chen Junyong, Liu Yongruo, Zhang Ji et al., Determination of gravity field in boundary belt between Indian and Eruasia plates, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica (in Chinese), 1994, 23(4): 241–265.
Chen, J. Y., Chang, G., Liu, Y. et al., Crustal movement, gravity field and atmospheric refraction in the Mt. Everest and its surrounding area, Chinese Science Bulletin (in Chinese), 1994, 39(13): 1204–1207.
Chen, J. Y., Chang, G., Lee, Y. L. et al., Crustal movement, gravity field and atmospheric refraction in the Mt. Everest, ZfV, 1994, (8): 389–400.
Chen, J. Y., Chang, G., Lee, Y. L. et al., An improved local geoid in the Mt. Everest area, ZfV, 1999, (11): 362–363.
Chen, J. Y., Chang, G., Lee, Y. L. et al., An improved local geoid in the Mt. Everest area, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica (in Chinese), 1999, 28(3): 278–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Yuan, J., Guo, C. et al. Progress in technology for the 2005 height determination of Qomolangma Feng (Mt. Everest). SCI CHINA SER D 49, 531–538 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-0531-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-0531-1