References
Hsu, P.D., Scott, D.A., Weinstein, J.A., Ran, F.A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E.J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., Cradick, T.J., Marraffini, L.A., Bao, G., and Zhang, F. (2013). DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31, 827–832.
Hu, X., Wang, C., Fu, Y., Liu, Q., Jiao, X., and Wang, K. (2016). Expanding the range of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice. Mol Plant 9, 943–945.
Hu, X., Meng, X., Liu, Q., Li, J., and Wang, K. (2017). Increasing the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9-VQR precise genome editing in rice. Plant Biotechnol J, doi: 10.1111/pbi.12771.
Jiang, F., and Doudna, J.A. (2017). CRISPR–Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys 46, 505–529.
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., and Marraffini, L.A. (2013). RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31, 233–239.
Kleinstiver, B.P., Prew, M.S., Tsai, S.Q., Topkar, V.V., Nguyen, N.T., Zheng, Z., Gonzales, A.P.W., Li, Z., Peterson, R.T., Yeh, J.R.J., Aryee, M. J., and Joung, J.K. (2015). Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0101800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91635301), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ14C130003), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Figure S1
The CRISPR-Cas9 system and sequence of codon-optimized Cas9 used in this study.
Figure S2 The target locations of D1 and D2.
Figure S3 The mutation efficiency of NGG and NAG PAMs.
Figure S4 The assay of mismatch tolerance within the protospacer.
Figure S5 The target locations of NAG1 to NAG8.
Figure S6 Mutational types of rice seedlings with NAG PAMs.
Figure S7 The strategy of mixed PAMs for multiple editing.
Figure S8 The target sites of NGG and NAG in rice genome.
Table S1 The off-target effects with NAG PAM during Bph14 editing
Table S2 The location of double targets of sgRNAs
Table S3 The editing events using sgRNA with mismatches in the protospacer
Table S4 Target sites of AG1—AG8 for genome editing
Table S5 The results of off-target detection
Table S6 Primers used in the study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, X., Hu, X., Liu, Q. et al. Robust genome editing of CRISPR-Cas9 at NAG PAMs in rice. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 122–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-017-9247-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-017-9247-9