Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experiment aimed to compare the ionic (Gadodiamide, Gd-DTPA-BMA) and non-ionic (Gadopentetate dimeglumine, Gd-DTPA) gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). A C6 glioma model was established in 12 Wistar rats, and magnetic resonance (MR) scans were performed six days after tumor implantation. Imaging was performed using a 3.0-T MR scanner with a 7-inch handmade circular coil. Pre-contrast T1 mapping and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1WI after a bolus injection (0.2 mL s−1) of GBCA at 0.4 mmol kg−1 were performed. Each rat received two DCE-MRI scans, 24 h apart. The first and second scans were performed using Gd-DTPA-BMA and Gd-DTPA, respectively. Image data were processed using the Patlak model. Both K trans and V p maps were generated. Tumors were manually segmented on all 3D K trans and V p maps. Pixel counts and mean values were recorded for use in a paired t-test. Three radiologists independently performed the tumor segmentation and value calculation. The agreements from different observers were subjective to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Readers demonstrated that the pixel counts of tumors in K trans maps were higher with Gd-DTPA-BMA than with Gd-DTPA (P<0.001, all readers). Although the K trans values were higher with Gd-DTPA-BMA than with Gd-DTPA, there was no statistical significance (P>0.05, all readers). The pixel counts of tumors in V p maps, as well as V p values, showed no obvious difference between the two agents (P>0.05, all readers). Excellent interobserver measurement reproducibility and reliability were demonstrated in the ICC tests. The Gd-DTPA-BMA contrast agent had significantly higher pixel counts of glioma in the K trans maps, and an increased tendency for average K trans values, indicating that DCE-MRI with Gd-DTPA-BMA may be more suitable and sensitive for the evaluation of glioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allegrini, P.R., Weidensteiner, C., and McSheehy, P.M. (2006). Direct comparison of macromolecular contrast agent Vistarem with Dotarem for detecting drug effects on tumor vasculature by DCE MRI. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 14, 2907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhenn, D., Shetab Boushehri, M.A., and Lamprecht, A. (2012). Drug delivery strategies for the treatment of malignant gliomas. Int J Pharmaceut 436, 299–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barboriak, D.P., MacFall, J.R., and Padua, A.O. (2004). Standardized software for calculation of K trans and Vp from dynamic T1-weighted MR images. In Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on MR in Drug Development: From Discovery to Clinical Therapeutic Trials, McLean Va, USA. 4.

  • Bayer Schering Pharma AG. (2008). MAGNEVIST® (Gadopentetic Acid Dimeglumine Salt Injection). Germany.

  • Blasiak, B., Tomanek, B., Abulrob, A., Iqbal, U., Stanimirovic, D., Albaghdadi, H., Foniok, T., Lun, X., Forsyth, P., and Sutherland, G.R. (2010). Detection of T2 changes in an early mouse brain tumor. Magn Reson Imaging 28, 784–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.L., Echley, M., and Wargo, K.A. (2010). A review of glioblastoma multiforme. US Pharmacist 35, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daldrup-Link, H.E., Kaiser, A., Helbich, T., Werner, M., Bjørnerud, A., Link, T.M., and Rummeny, E.J. (2003). Macromolecular contrast medium (feruglose) versus small molecular contrast medium (gadopentetate) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol 10, 1237–1246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doblas, S., Saunders, D., Kshirsagar, P., Pye, Q., Oblander, J., Gordon, B., Kosanke, S., Floyd, R.A., and Towner, R.A. (2008). Phenyl-tert-butylnitrone induces tumor regression and decreases angiogenesis in a C6 rat glioma model. Free Radic Biol Med 44, 63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Jeong, E.K., Mohs, A.M., Emerson, L., and Lu, Z.R. (2008). Characterization of tumor angiogenesis with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and biodegradable macromolecular contrast agents in mice. Magn Reson Med 60, 1347–1352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2015). Model animals and their applications. Sci China Life Sci 58, 319–320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GE Healthcare. (2007). Omniscantm (Gadadiamide Injection). USA.

  • Gordon, Y., Partovi, S., and Müller-Eschner, M. (2014). Dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging: fundamentals and application to the evaluation of the peripheral perfusion. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 4, 147–164.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, D.H., Baker, S.J., Giovannini, M., Garbow, J., and Weiss, W. (2003). Mouse models of human cancer consortium symposium on nervous system tumors. Cancer Res 63, 3001–3004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., Buckley, D.L., and Parker, G.J.M. (2005). Dynamic Contrast- Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology (Medical Radiology/ Diagnostic Imaging). (Heidelberg: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Sammet, S., Yang, X., Jia, G., Takayama, Y., and Knopp, M.V. (2010). Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 45, 233–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J.P.B., Jackson, A., Parker, G.J.M., and Jayson, G.C. (2007). DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br J Cancer 96, 189–195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quick, A., Patel, D., Hadziahmetovic, M., Chakravarti, A., and Mehta, M. (2010). Current therapeutic paradigms in glioblastoma. Rev Recent Clin Trials 5, 14–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts, P. (2004). Quantitative MRI of the Brain: Measuring Changes Caused by Disease. (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Wu, J., Gao, D., Fei, Z., Qu, Y., and Jing, J. (2002). Development of a rat C6 brain tumor model. Chin Med J 115, 455–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Liu, G., Lou, X. et al. Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Sci. China Life Sci. 60, 11–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-0386-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-0386-2

Keywords

Navigation