Abstract
Co-evolutionary theory assumes co-adapted characteristics are a positive response to counter those of another species, whereby co-evolved species reach an evolutionarily stable interaction through bilateral adaptation. However, evidence from the fig-fig wasp mutualistic system implies very different co-evolutionary selection mechanisms, due to the inherent conflict among interacted partners. Fig plants appear to have discriminatively enforced fig wasps to evolve “adaptation characteristics” that provide greater benefit to the fig, and fig wasps appear to have diversified their evolutionary strategies in response to discriminative enforcement by figs and competition among different fig wasp species. In what appears to be an asymmetric interaction, the prosperity of cooperative pollinating wasps should inevitably lead to population increases of parasitic individuals, thus resulting in localized extinctions of pollinating wasps. In response, the sanctioning of parasitic wasps by the fig should lead to a reduction in the parasitic wasp population. The meta-populations created by such asymmetric interactions may result in each population of coevolved species chaotically oscillated, temporally or evolutionarily.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Thompson JN. Concepts of coevolution. Trends Ecol Evol, 1989, 4: 179–183
Weiblen GD. Interspecific coevolution. In: Nature Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group, 2003
Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 1964, 586-608
Janzen DH. How to be a fig. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1979, 10: 13–51
Weiblen GD. How to be a fig wasp. Ann Rev Entomol, 2002, 47: 299–330
Ronsted N, Weiblen GD, Cook JM, Salamin N, Machado CA, Savolainen V. 60 million years of co-divergence in the fig-wasp symbiosis. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2005, 272: 2593–2599
Freeland W, Janzen DH. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat, 1974, 269-289
Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982
Janzen DH. When is it coevolution? Evolution, 1980, 34: 611–612
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. The evolution of cooperation. Science, 1981, 211: 1390–1396
Weyl EG, Frederickson ME, Douglas WY, Pierce NE. Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2010, 107: 15712–15716
Maynard Smith J. Do animals convey information about their intentions? J Theor Biol, 1982, 97: 1–5
Pellmyr O, Huth CJ. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature, 1994, 372: 257–260
Wang RW, Sun BF, Zheng Q. Diffusive coevolution and mutualism maintenance mechanisms in a fig-fig wasp system. Ecology, 2010, 91: 1308–1316
Kiers ET, Rousseau RA, West SA, Denison RF. Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature, 2003, 425: 78–81
Wang RW, He JZ, Wang YQ, Shi L, Li YT. Asymmetric interaction will facilitate the evolution of cooperation. Sci China Life Sci, 2010, 53: 1041–1046
Yu DW. Parasites of mutualisms. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2001, 72: 529–546
Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. Am Nat, 2000, 156: S62–76
Pellmyr O, Leebens-Mack J, Huth CJ. Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences. Nature, 1996, 380: 155–156
Kiers ET, Denison RF. Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant-rhizosphere mutualisms. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 2008, 39: 215–236
Wiebes J. Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1979, 10: 1–12
Wang RW, Shi L, Ai SM, Zheng Q. Trade-off between reciprocal mutualists: local resource availability-oriented interaction in fig/fig wasp mutualism. J Anim Ecol, 2008, 77: 616–623
Jousselin E, Hossaert-McKey M, Herre EA, Kjellberg F. Why do fig wasps actively pollinate monoecious figs? Oecologia, 2003, 134: 381–387
Jander KC, Herre EA. Host sanctions and pollinator cheating in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2010, 277: 1481–1488
Wang RW, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Shi L, Zhu LX. Asymmetric interaction and indeterminate fitness correlation between cooperative partners in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J Roy Soc Interface, 2011, 8: 1487–1496
Kerdelhue C, Rossi JP, Rasplus JY. Comparative community ecology studies on old world figs and fig wasps. Ecology, 2000, 81: 2832–2849
Wang RW, Zheng Q. Structure of a fig wasp community: temporal segregation of oviposition and larval diets. Symbiosis, 2008, 45: 113–116
West SA, Herre EA. The ecology of the new-world fig-parasitizing wasps Idarnes and implications for the evolution of the fig-pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1994, 258: 67–72
Wang RW, Yang CY, Zhao GF, Yang JX. Fragmentation effects on diversity of wasp community and its impact on fig/fig wasp interaction in Ficus racemosa L. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47: 20–26
Weiblen GD. Correlated evolution in fig pollination. Sys Biol, 2004, 53: 128–139
Wang RW, Ridley J, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Dunn DW, Cook J, Douglas WY. Interference competition and high temperatures reduce the virulence of fig wasps and stabilize a fig-wasp mutualism. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4: e7802
Cook JM, Rasplus JY. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends Ecol Evol, 2003, 18: 241–248
Dunn DW, Segar ST, Ridley J, Chan R, Crozier RH, Douglas WY, Cook JM. A role for parasites in stabilising the fig-pollinator mutualism. PLoS Biol, 2008, 6: e59
Nefdt RJC, Compton SG. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig fig wasp mutualism. J Anim Ecol, 1996, 65: 170–182
Yang C, Wang R, Zhao G, Yang D. Diet of non-pollinating wasps and their impact on the stability of fig-pollinator wasp mutualism. Zool Res, 2005, 26: 379
Sun BF, Wang RW, Hu Z. The diet separation of fig wasps and the stability of fig-fig wasp. Biodiversity Sci, 2008, 16: 525–532
Sun R. Essentials of Animal Ecology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 1992
Yu DW, Wilson HB, Pierce NE. An empirical model of species coexistence in a spatially structured environment. Ecology, 2001, 82: 1761–1771
Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Kahmen A, Klein AM, Buchmann N, Perner J, Tscharntke T. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biol, 2008, 6: 947–956
Wang RW, Sun BF. Seasonal change in the structure of fig-wasp community and its implication for conservation. Symbiosis, 2009, 47: 77–83
Bull JJ, Rice WR. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. J Theor Biol, 1991, 149: 63–74
Goto R, Okamoto T, Toby KE, Kawakita A, Kato M. Selective flower abortion maintains moth cooperation in a newly discovered pollination mutualism. Ecol Lett, 2010, 13: 321–329
Denison RF. Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia. Am Nat, 2000, 156: 567–576
Sun B, Wang R, Hu Z, Li Y. The relation between two non-pollinating wasps oviposition and the fruit abscission on Ficus racemosa. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29: 1–6
Herre EA. Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia, 1989, 45: 637–646
Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Pellmyr O. The evolutionary ecology of cheating: does superficial oviposition facilitate the evolution of a cheater yucca moth? Ecol Entomol, 2008, 33: 765–770
Harrison S, Taylor AD, Hanski I, Gilpin M. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. London: Academic Press, 1997. 27–42
Hanski I, Gilpin ME. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution: Academic press San Diego, California. 1997
Thompson JN, Fernandez CC. Temporal dynamics of antagonism and mutualism in a geographically variable plant-insect interaction. Ecology, 2006, 87: 103–112
Piculell BJ, Hoeksema JD, Thompson JN. Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics. BMC Biol, 2006, 6
Wang RW, Yang JX, Yang DR. Seasonal changes in the trade-off among fig-supported wasps and viable seeds in figs and their evolutionary implications. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47: 144–152
West SA, Kiers ET, Pen I, Denison RF. Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated? J Evol Biol, 2002, 15: 830–837
Wang RW, Dunn DW, Sun BF. Discriminative host sanctions in a fig-wasp mutualism. Ecology, 2013, doi: 10.1890/13-0749.1
Doebeli M, Knowlton N. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 8676–8680
Wang RW, Shi L. The evolution of cooperation in asymmetric systems. Sci China Life Sci, 2010, 53: 139–149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at link.springer.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, R., Yang, Y. & Wiggins, N.L. Asymmetric or diffusive co-evolution generates meta-populations in fig-fig wasp mutualisms. Sci. China Life Sci. 57, 596–602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4653-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4653-y