Skip to main content
Download PDF

Coarse root spatial distribution determined using a ground-penetrating radar technique in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, China

Science China Life Sciences volume 56, pages 1038–1046 (2013)Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 December 2013

Abstract

Coarse roots play a critical role in forest ecosystems and both abiotic and biotic factors affect their spatial distribution. To some extent, coarse root density may reflect the quantity of root biomass and biotic competition in forests. However, using traditional methods (e.g., excavation) to study coarse roots is challenging, because those methods are time-consuming and laborious. Furthermore, these destructive methods cannot be repeated in the same forests. Therefore, the discovery of non-destructive methods for root studies will be very significant. In this study, we used a ground-penetrating radar technique to detect the coarse root density of three habitats (ridge, slope and valley) and the dominant tree species (Castanopsis eyrei and Schima superba) in a subtropical forest. We found that (i) the mean of coarse root density for these three habitats was 88.04 roots m−2, with roots being mainly distributed at depths of 0–40 cm. Coarse root densities were lower in deeper soils and in areas far from the trunk. (ii) Coarse root densities differed significantly among the three habitats studied here with slope habitat having the lowest coarse root density. Compared with S. superba, C. eyrei had more roots distributed in deeper soils. Furthermore, coarse roots with a diameter >3 cm occurred more frequently in the valleys, compared with root densities in ridge and slope habitats, and most coarse roots occurred at soil depths of 20–40 cm. (iii) The coarse root density correlated negatively with tree species richness at soil depths of 40–60 cm. The abundances of the dominant species, such as C. eyrei, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Pinus massoniana, had significant impacts on coarse root density. (iv) The soil depth of 0–40 cm was the “basic distribution layer” for coarse roots since the majority of coarse roots were found in this soil layer with an average root density of 84.18 roots m−2, which had no significant linear relationships with topography, tree species richness, rarefied tree species richness and tree density. Significant relationships between coarse root density and these factors were found at the soil depth of 40–60 cm, which was the “potential distribution layer” for coarse root distribution.

References

  1. Stover D B, Day F P, Butnor J R, et al. Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. Ecology, 2007, 88: 1328–1334

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Resh S C, Battaglia M, Worledge D, et al. Coarse root biomass for eucalypt plantations in Tasmania, Australia: Sources of variation and methods for assessment. Trees-Struct Funct, 2003, 17: 389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Day F P, Weber E P, Hinkle C, et al. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root length and distribution in an oak-palmetto scrub ecosystem in central Florida. Global Change Biol, 1996, 2: 143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Misra R, Turnbull C, Cromer R, et al. Below- and above-ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation: I Biomass. Forest Ecol Manag, 1998, 106: 283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harding R, Gale M, Grigal D. Soil productivity index: Predictions of site quality for white spruce plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1991, 55: 1701–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li L H. Biomass allocation in mixed forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Tsoongiodendron odorum (in Chinese). J Fujian College Forest, 2003, 23: 297–300

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y Y, Fan H B. Spatial structure of biomass and nutrients in the mixed Pinus massoniana-Michelia macclurei Plantation (in Chinese). Acta Agricult Univ Jiangxi, 2005, 27: 700–704

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang J E, Li Y L, Huang D Z, et al. Root distribution pattern of Mulberry shoots intercropped with Peanut and its influence on soil moisture and nutrient in Qian’an. J Soil Water Conserv, 2007, 21: 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ren A Z, Gao Y B, Wang J L. Root distribution and canopy structure of Salix gordejevii in different sandy land habitats. Acta Eco Sin, 2001, 21: 399–404

    Google Scholar 

  10. Archer E, Strauss H. Effect of plant density on root distribution of three-year-old grafted 99 Richter grapevines. S Afr J Enol Vitic, 1985, 6: 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schroth G. Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agroforest Syst, 1995, 30: 125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H, et al. Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia, 2001, 126: 276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu C J, Guo X L, Xu Z Q. Roots study on mixed forest of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. and Quercus variabilis Blume in Beijing (in Chinese). J Beijing Forest College, 1985, 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xie Y, An S, Wu B, et al. Density-dependent root morphology and root distribution in the submerged plant Vallisneria natans. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 195–200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bi H, Turvey N D, Heinrich P. Rooting density and tree size of Pinus radiata (D. Don) in response to competition from Eucalyptus obliqua (L’Herit). Forest Ecol Manag, 1992, 49: 31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wielopolski L, Hendrey G, Daniels J, et al. Imaging tree root systems in situ. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Gold Cost, Australia, 2000. 642–646

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniels D J, ed. Ground Penetrating Radar. Wiley Online Library, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hruska J, Čermák J, Šustek S. Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19: 125–130

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Butnor J R, Doolittle J, Kress L, et al. Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21: 1269–1278

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Z H, Yu M J, Ding B B, et al. Types of evergreen broad-leaved forests and the species diversity in Gutian Mountain Nature Reserve. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2003, 9: 341–345

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molino J F, Sabatier D. Tree diversity in tropical rain forests: A validation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Science, 2001, 294: 1702–1704

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2009. http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng R M, Wang R L, Xiao W F, et al. Spatial distribution of root biomass of Pinus massoniana plantation in Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Acta Eco Sin, 2012, 32: 823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Man X L. Distribution patterns of root systems of Populus simonii Carr. in highland of Mu Us Sandland. J Soil Water Conserv, 2008, 6: 48–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tufekcioglu A, Raich J, Isenhart T, et al. Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution and soil respiration in a multispecies riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA. Agroforest Syst, 1998, 44: 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Majdi H, Persson H. Spatial distribution of fine roots, rhizosphere and bulk soil chemistry in an acidified Picea abies stand. Scand J Forest Res, 1993, 8: 147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Büttner V, Leuschner C. Spatial and temporal patterns of fine root abundance in a mixed oak-beech forest. Forest Ecol Manag, 1994, 70: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brisson J, Reynolds J F. The effect of neighbors on root distribution in a creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) population. Ecology, 1994, 75: 1693–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Casper B B, Jackson R B. Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Eco Syst, 1997, 28: 545–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stegen J C, Hurlbert A H. Inferring ecological processes from taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional trait β-diversity. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6: e20906

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China

    Hui Yan, XinLiang Dong, Gang Feng & ShouRen Zhang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Hui Yan, XinLiang Dong & Gang Feng

  3. Inner Mongolia Forestry Monitoring and Planning Academy, Hohhot, 010020, China

    Hui Yan

  4. TreeRadar, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA

    Anthony Mucciardi

Authors
  1. Hui Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. XinLiang Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gang Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ShouRen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anthony Mucciardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShouRen Zhang.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, H., Dong, X., Feng, G. et al. Coarse root spatial distribution determined using a ground-penetrating radar technique in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, China. Sci. China Life Sci. 56, 1038–1046 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4560-7

Keywords

  • abiotic factors
  • biotic factors
  • coarse root density
  • ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
  • spatial distribution