Abstract
Protein folding is regarded as a quantum transition between the torsion states of a polypeptide chain. According to the quantum theory of conformational dynamics, we propose the dynamical contact order (DCO) defined as a characteristic of the contact described by the moment of inertia and the torsion potential energy of the polypeptide chain between contact residues. Consequently, the protein folding rate can be quantitatively studied from the point of view of dynamics. By comparing theoretical calculations and experimental data on the folding rate of 80 proteins, we successfully validate the view that protein folding is a quantum conformational transition. We conclude that (i) a correlation between the protein folding rate and the contact inertial moment exists; (ii) multi-state protein folding can be regarded as a quantum conformational transition similar to that of two-state proteins but with an intermediate delay. We have estimated the order of magnitude of the time delay; (iii) folding can be classified into two types, exergonic and endergonic. Most of the two-state proteins with higher folding rate are exergonic and most of the multi-state proteins with low folding rate are endergonic. The folding speed limit is determined by exergonic folding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Maxwell K L, Wildes D, Zarrine-Afsar A, et al. Protein folding: Defining a “standard” set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two-state proteins. Protein Sci, 2005, 14: 602–616 15689503, 10.1110/ps.041205405, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXit1Sns7o%3D
Qiu L, Pabit S A, Roitberg A E, et al. Smaller and faster: The 20 residue Trp-cage protein folds in 4 μs. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124: 12952–12953 12405814, 10.1021/ja0279141, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xnsl2hsrk%3D
Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton W A. The protein folding ’speed limit’. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2004, 14: 76–88 15102453, 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.013, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhsFWqsro%3D
Ghosh K, Ozkan B, Dill K A. The ultimate speed limit to protein folding is conformational searching. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 11920–11927 17824609, 10.1021/ja066785b, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpvFOitb0%3D
Plaxco K W, Simons K T, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol, 1998, 227: 985–994 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645
Ivankov D N, Garbuzynskiy S O, Alm E, et al. Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate. Protein Sci, 2003, 12: 2057–2062 12931003, 10.1110/ps.0302503, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVehs7c%3D
Ivankov D N, Finkelstein A V. Prediction of protein folding rates from the amino acid sequence-predicted secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 8942–8944 15184682, 10.1073/pnas.0402659101, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltlWqsrY%3D
Shen H B, Song J N, Chou K C. Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequence by fusing multiple sequential features. J Biomed Sci Eng, 2009, 2: 136–143 10.4236/jbise.2009.23024, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXpvFeit7w%3D
Huang J T, Tian J. Amino acid sequence predicts folding rate for middle-size two-state proteins. Proteins, 2006, 63: 551–554 16477599, 10.1002/prot.20911
Huang L T, Gromiha M M. Analysis and prediction of protein folding rates using quadratic response surface models. J Comput Chem, 2008, 29: 1675–1683 18351617, 10.1002/jcc.20925, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnvFCgu7o%3D
Capriotti E, Casadio R. K-Fold: A tool for the prediction of the protein folding kinetic order and rate. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23: 385–386 17138584, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl610, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlOlurs%3D
Gromiha M M, Thangakani A M, Selvaraj S. FOLD-RATE: Prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006, 34: W70–W74 16845101, 10.1093/nar/gkl043, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xps1yisbk%3D
Zhang L, Sun T. Folding rate prediction using n-order contact distance for proteins with two- and three-state folding kinetics. Biophys Chem, 2005, 113: 9–16 15617806, 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.07.036, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFGht7fM
Ouyang Z, Liang J. Predicting protein folding rates from geometric contact and amino acid sequence. Protein Sci, 2008, 17: 1256–1263 18434498, 10.1110/ps.034660.108, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot1ehsLw%3D
Segal M R. A novel topology for representing protein folds. Protein Sci, 2009, 18: 686–693 19309686, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXms1agsL4%3D
Jang H, Hall C K, Zhou Y. Protein folding pathways and kinetics: Molecular dynamics simulations of β-strand motifs. Biophys J, 2002, 83: 819–835 12124267, 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75211-9, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xls1Ogu7Y%3D
Schonbrun J, Dill K A. Fast protein folding kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 12678–12682 14569019, 10.1073/pnas.1735417100, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXoslKnt7o%3D
Luo L F. Conformation transitional rate in protein folding. Int J Quant Chem, 1995, 54: 243–247 10.1002/qua.560540407, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXltFWjtLk%3D
Luo L F. Theoretic-physical Approach to Molecular Biology. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2004. 388–402
Luo L F. Protein folding as a quantum transition between conformational states. arXiv: 0906.2452v1, 2009, URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.2452
Luo L F. Protein folding as a quantum transition between conformational states: Basic formulas and applications. arXiv: 1008.0237, 2010, URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0237
Bernstein F C, Koetzle T F, Williams G J, et al. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. Eur J Biochem, 1977, 80: 319–324 923582, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11885.x, 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXhslKkug%3D%3D
Berman H M. The Protein Data Bank: A historical perspective. Acta Cryst, 2008, A64: 88–95 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVGhurzM
Kamagata K, Aral M, Kuwajima K. Unification of the folding mechanism of non-two-state and two-state proteins. J Mol Biol, 2004, 339: 951–965 15165862, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.015, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXksVems7g%3D
Zhu Y, Alonso D O V, Maki K, et al. Ultrafast folding of α3D: A de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 15486–15491 14671331, 10.1073/pnas.2136623100, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVCjsQ%3D%3D
Hagen S J, Hofrichter J, Szabo A, et al. Diffusion-limited contact formation in unfolded cytochrome c: Estimating the maximum rate of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 11615–11617 8876184, 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11615, 1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xmtlagur0%3D
Jacob M, Schindler T, Balbach J, et al. Diffusion control in an elementary protein folding reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 5622–5627 9159122, 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5622, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsFKks7Y%3D
Fersht A R. Optimization of rates of protein folding: The nucleation-condensation mechanism and its implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: 10869–10873 7479900, 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10869, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXps1amur4%3D
Debe D A, Goddard III W A. First principles prediction of protein folding rates. J Mol Biol, 1999, 294: 619–625 10610784, 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3278, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXotFers7k%3D
Tang K S, Guralnick B J, Wang W K, et al. Stability and folding of the tumour suppressor protein p16. J Mol Biol, 1999, 285: 1869–1886 9917418, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2420, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtV2htbo%3D
Galzitskaya O V, Garbuzynskiy S O, Ivankov D N, et al. Chain length is the main determinant of the folding rate for proteins with three-state folding kinetics. Proteins, 2003, 51: 162–166 12660985, 10.1002/prot.10343, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtVWktbc%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Luo, L. The dynamical contact order: Protein folding rate parameters based on quantum conformational transitions. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 386–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4158-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4158-x