Skip to main content

The dynamical contact order: Protein folding rate parameters based on quantum conformational transitions

Abstract

Protein folding is regarded as a quantum transition between the torsion states of a polypeptide chain. According to the quantum theory of conformational dynamics, we propose the dynamical contact order (DCO) defined as a characteristic of the contact described by the moment of inertia and the torsion potential energy of the polypeptide chain between contact residues. Consequently, the protein folding rate can be quantitatively studied from the point of view of dynamics. By comparing theoretical calculations and experimental data on the folding rate of 80 proteins, we successfully validate the view that protein folding is a quantum conformational transition. We conclude that (i) a correlation between the protein folding rate and the contact inertial moment exists; (ii) multi-state protein folding can be regarded as a quantum conformational transition similar to that of two-state proteins but with an intermediate delay. We have estimated the order of magnitude of the time delay; (iii) folding can be classified into two types, exergonic and endergonic. Most of the two-state proteins with higher folding rate are exergonic and most of the multi-state proteins with low folding rate are endergonic. The folding speed limit is determined by exergonic folding.

References

  1. Maxwell K L, Wildes D, Zarrine-Afsar A, et al. Protein folding: Defining a “standard” set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two-state proteins. Protein Sci, 2005, 14: 602–616 15689503, 10.1110/ps.041205405, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXit1Sns7o%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu L, Pabit S A, Roitberg A E, et al. Smaller and faster: The 20 residue Trp-cage protein folds in 4 μs. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124: 12952–12953 12405814, 10.1021/ja0279141, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xnsl2hsrk%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton W A. The protein folding ’speed limit’. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2004, 14: 76–88 15102453, 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.013, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhsFWqsro%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh K, Ozkan B, Dill K A. The ultimate speed limit to protein folding is conformational searching. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 11920–11927 17824609, 10.1021/ja066785b, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpvFOitb0%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Plaxco K W, Simons K T, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol, 1998, 227: 985–994 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivankov D N, Garbuzynskiy S O, Alm E, et al. Contact order revisited: Influence of protein size on the folding rate. Protein Sci, 2003, 12: 2057–2062 12931003, 10.1110/ps.0302503, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVehs7c%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivankov D N, Finkelstein A V. Prediction of protein folding rates from the amino acid sequence-predicted secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 8942–8944 15184682, 10.1073/pnas.0402659101, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltlWqsrY%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen H B, Song J N, Chou K C. Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequence by fusing multiple sequential features. J Biomed Sci Eng, 2009, 2: 136–143 10.4236/jbise.2009.23024, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXpvFeit7w%3D

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang J T, Tian J. Amino acid sequence predicts folding rate for middle-size two-state proteins. Proteins, 2006, 63: 551–554 16477599, 10.1002/prot.20911

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang L T, Gromiha M M. Analysis and prediction of protein folding rates using quadratic response surface models. J Comput Chem, 2008, 29: 1675–1683 18351617, 10.1002/jcc.20925, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnvFCgu7o%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Capriotti E, Casadio R. K-Fold: A tool for the prediction of the protein folding kinetic order and rate. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23: 385–386 17138584, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl610, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlOlurs%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gromiha M M, Thangakani A M, Selvaraj S. FOLD-RATE: Prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006, 34: W70–W74 16845101, 10.1093/nar/gkl043, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xps1yisbk%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang L, Sun T. Folding rate prediction using n-order contact distance for proteins with two- and three-state folding kinetics. Biophys Chem, 2005, 113: 9–16 15617806, 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.07.036, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFGht7fM

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ouyang Z, Liang J. Predicting protein folding rates from geometric contact and amino acid sequence. Protein Sci, 2008, 17: 1256–1263 18434498, 10.1110/ps.034660.108, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot1ehsLw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal M R. A novel topology for representing protein folds. Protein Sci, 2009, 18: 686–693 19309686, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXms1agsL4%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jang H, Hall C K, Zhou Y. Protein folding pathways and kinetics: Molecular dynamics simulations of β-strand motifs. Biophys J, 2002, 83: 819–835 12124267, 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75211-9, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xls1Ogu7Y%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schonbrun J, Dill K A. Fast protein folding kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 12678–12682 14569019, 10.1073/pnas.1735417100, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXoslKnt7o%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo L F. Conformation transitional rate in protein folding. Int J Quant Chem, 1995, 54: 243–247 10.1002/qua.560540407, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXltFWjtLk%3D

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo L F. Theoretic-physical Approach to Molecular Biology. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2004. 388–402

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luo L F. Protein folding as a quantum transition between conformational states. arXiv: 0906.2452v1, 2009, URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.2452

  21. Luo L F. Protein folding as a quantum transition between conformational states: Basic formulas and applications. arXiv: 1008.0237, 2010, URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0237

  22. Bernstein F C, Koetzle T F, Williams G J, et al. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. Eur J Biochem, 1977, 80: 319–324 923582, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11885.x, 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXhslKkug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berman H M. The Protein Data Bank: A historical perspective. Acta Cryst, 2008, A64: 88–95 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVGhurzM

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamagata K, Aral M, Kuwajima K. Unification of the folding mechanism of non-two-state and two-state proteins. J Mol Biol, 2004, 339: 951–965 15165862, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.015, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXksVems7g%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Y, Alonso D O V, Maki K, et al. Ultrafast folding of α3D: A de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 15486–15491 14671331, 10.1073/pnas.2136623100, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVCjsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagen S J, Hofrichter J, Szabo A, et al. Diffusion-limited contact formation in unfolded cytochrome c: Estimating the maximum rate of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 11615–11617 8876184, 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11615, 1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xmtlagur0%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacob M, Schindler T, Balbach J, et al. Diffusion control in an elementary protein folding reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 5622–5627 9159122, 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5622, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsFKks7Y%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fersht A R. Optimization of rates of protein folding: The nucleation-condensation mechanism and its implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: 10869–10873 7479900, 10.1073/pnas.92.24.10869, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXps1amur4%3D

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Debe D A, Goddard III W A. First principles prediction of protein folding rates. J Mol Biol, 1999, 294: 619–625 10610784, 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3278, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXotFers7k%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang K S, Guralnick B J, Wang W K, et al. Stability and folding of the tumour suppressor protein p16. J Mol Biol, 1999, 285: 1869–1886 9917418, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2420, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtV2htbo%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Galzitskaya O V, Garbuzynskiy S O, Ivankov D N, et al. Chain length is the main determinant of the folding rate for proteins with three-state folding kinetics. Proteins, 2003, 51: 162–166 12660985, 10.1002/prot.10343, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtVWktbc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LiaoFu Luo.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Luo, L. The dynamical contact order: Protein folding rate parameters based on quantum conformational transitions. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 386–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4158-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4158-x

Keywords

  • moment of inertia
  • dynamical contact order (DCO)
  • protein folding rate