Skip to main content

Cotton bollworm resistance to Bt transgenic cotton: A case analysis

Abstract

Cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) is one of the most serious insect pests of cotton. Transgenic cotton expressing Cry toxins derived from a soil bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), has been produced to target this pest. Bt cotton has been widely planted around the world, and this has resulted in efficient control of bollworm populations with reduced use of synthetic insecticides. However, evolution of resistance by this pest threatens the continued success of Bt cotton. To date, no field populations of bollworm have evolved significant levels of resistance; however, several laboratory-selected Cry-resistant strains of H. armigera have been obtained, which suggests that bollworm has the capacity to evolve resistance to Bt. The development of resistance to Bt is of great concern, and there is a vast body of research in this area aimed at ensuring the continued success of Bt cotton. Here, we review studies on the evolution of Bt resistance in H. armigera, focusing on the biochemical and molecular basis of Bt resistance. We also discuss resistance management strategies, and monitoring programs implemented in China, Australia, and India.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Naranjo S E, Ruberson J R, Sharma H C, et al. The present and future role of insect-resistant genetically modified cotton in IPM. In: Romeis J, Shelton A M, Kennedy G G, eds. Integration of Insect-resistant Genetically Modified Crops Within IPM Programs. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2008. 159–194, 10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. James C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2008. Brief no. 39. ISAAA, Ithaca, NY

  3. Gassmann A J, Carrière Y, Tabashnik B E. Fitness costs of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol, 2009, 54: 147–163, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXpsFeltQ%3D%3D, 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090518, 19067630

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabashnik B E, Carrière Y, Dennehy T J, et al. Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lessons from the laboratory and field. J Econ Entomol, 2003, 96: 1031–1038, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXns1Kgurs%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493-96.4.1031, 14503572

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kranthi K R, Kranthi S, Ali S, et al. Resistance to Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in a laboratory selected strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Curr Sci, 2000, 78: 1001–1004, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjs1ajurw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang G M, Tan W J, Guo Y Y. Study on screening and inheritance mode of resistance to Bt transgenic cotton in Helicoverpa armigera. Acta Entomol Sin, 2000, 43: 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  7. Akhurst R J, James W, Bird L J, et al. Resistance to the Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol, 2003, 96: 1290–1299, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXns1Kgu7k%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493-96.4.1290, 14503603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gujar G, Kalia V, Kumari A, et al. Helicoverpa armigera baseline susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and resistance management for Bt cotton in India. J Invertebr Pathol, 2007, 95: 214–219, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVOntrk%3D, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.011, 17475275

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahon R J, Olsen K M, Downes S, et al. Frequency of alleles conferring resistance to the Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in Australian population of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol, 2007, 100: 1844–1853, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot12guw%3D%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1844:FOACRT]2.0.CO;2, 18232402

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu K M, Lu Y H, Feng H Q, et al. Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin-containing cotton. Science, 2008, 321: 1676–1678, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFamtrrL, 10.1126/science.1160550, 18801998

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao Y L, Feng H Q, Wu K M. Regulation of the seasonal population patterns of Helicoverpa armigera moths by Bt cotton planting. Transgenic Res, 2010, 19: 557–562, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXos1Ghtbg%3D, 10.1007/s11248-009-9337-1, 19847665

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gould F. Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu Rev Entomol, 1998, 43: 701–726, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXktlCgug%3D%3D, 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701, 15012402

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bates S L, Zhao J Z, Roush R T, et al. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nat Biotechnol, 2005, 23: 57–62, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsFGmtw%3D%3D, 10.1038/nbt1056, 15637622

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tabashnik B E, Dennehy T J, Carriere Y. Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 15389–15393, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1ShtrrJ, 10.1073/pnas.0507857102, 16227430

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang G M, Wu K M, Yu H K, et al. Changes of inheritance mode and fitness in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) along with its resistance evolution to Cry1Ac toxin. J Invertebr Pathol, 2008, 97: 142–149, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVSmsr4%3D, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.09.007, 17950749

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu X J, Yu L Y, Wu Y D. Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71: 948–954, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsVKgt74%3D, 10.1128/AEM.71.2.948-954.2005, 15691952

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y J, Chen H Y, Wu Y D, et al. Mutated cadherin alleles from a field population of Helicoverpa armigera confer resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2007, 73: 6939–6944, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlSksLbN, 10.1128/AEM.01703-07, 17827322

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Y J, Chen H Y, Wu S W, et al. Identification and molecular detection of a deletion mutation responsible for a truncated cadherin of Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2006, 36: 735–740, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xosl2ju7s%3D, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.06.003, 16935222

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y H, Yang Y J, Gao W Y, et al. Introgression of a disrupted cadherin gene enables susceptible Helicoverpa armigera to obtain resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac. Bull Entomol Res, 2009, 99: 175–181, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXksVKgsr8%3D, 10.1017/S0007485308006226, 18954492

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y D, Vassal J M, Royer M, et al. A single linkage group confers dominant resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin Cry1Ac in Helicoverpa armigera. J Appl Entomol, 2009, 133: 375–380, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnvVWlu7k%3D, 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01368.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kranthi K R, Dhawad C S, Naidu S R, et al. Inheritance of resistance in Indian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to Cry1Ac toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Crop Prot, 2006, 25: 119–124, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht12ksLnF, 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.03.011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang G M, Wu K M, Rector B, et al. Diapause, cold hardiness and flight ability of Cry1Ac-resistant and -susceptible strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Eur J Entomol, 2007, 104: 699–704, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVCltbo%3D

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X C, Wu K M, Liang G M, et al. Modified female calling behaviour in Cry1Ac-resistant Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag Sci, 2009, 65: 353–357, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjslSrsb4%3D, 10.1002/ps.1697, 19165761

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao X C, Wu K M, Liang G M, et al. Altered mating behaviour in a Cry1Ac-resistant strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Appl Entomol, 2008, 132: 360–365, 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01268.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bird L J, Akhurst R J. Effects of host plant species on fitness costs of Bt resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol Control, 2007, 40: 196–203, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bravo A, Gómez I, Conde J, et al. Oligomerization triggers binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2004, 1667: 38–46, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsFWit70%3D, 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.08.013, 15533304

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómez I, Sánchez J, Miranda R, et al. Cadherin-like receptor binding facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix α-1 in domain I and oligomer pre-pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. FEBS letters, 2002, 513: 242–246, 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02321-9, 11904158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang X B, Candas M, Griko N B, et al. Cytotoxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin depends on specific binding of the toxin to the cadherin receptor BT-R1 expressed in insect cells. Cell Death Differ, 2005, 12: 1407–1416, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtV2kt73N, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401675, 15920532

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X B, Candas M, Griko N B, et al. A mechanism of cell death involving an adenylyl cyclase/PKA signaling pathway is induced by the Cry1Ab toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 9897–9902, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmvVajtLs%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0604017103, 16788061

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X B, Griko N B, Corona S K, et al. Enhanced exocytosis of the receptor BT-R1 induced by Cry1Ab toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis directly correlates to the execution of cell death. Comp Biochem Physiol B, 2008, 149: 581–588, 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.12.006, 18230416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferré J, van Rie J. Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol, 2002, 47: 501–533, 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145234, 11729083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shelton A M, Zhao J Z, Wang P. Bt resistance management: have we been lucky or smart? In: Cótè, J C, Otvos, I S, Schwartz J L, eds. 6th Pacific Rim Conference on the Biotechnology of Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Environmental Impact. Victoria BC, 2005. 69–71

  33. Oppert B, Kramer K J, Beeman R W, et al. Proteinase-mediated insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J Biol Chem, 1997, 272: 23473–23476, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmtlOhsL0%3D, 10.1074/jbc.272.38.23473, 9295279

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li H R, Oppert B, Higgins R A, et al. Comparative analysis of proteinase activities of Bacillus thuringiensis-resistant and -susceptible Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2004, 34: 753–762, 15262280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karumbaiah L, Oppert B, Jurat-Fuentes J L, et al. Analysis of midgut proteinases from Bacillus thuringiensis-susceptible and -resistant Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Comp Biochem Physiol B, 2007, 146: 139–146, 10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.10.104, 17145193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rajagopal R, Arora N, Sivakumar S, et al. Resistance of Helicoverpa armigera to Cry1Ac toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is due to im proper processing of the protoxin. Biochem J, 2009, 419: 309–316, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjs1ynt7k%3D, 10.1042/BJ20081152, 19146482

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gunning R V, Dang H T, Kemp F C, et al. New resistance mechanism in Helicoverpa armigera threatens transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71: 2558–2563, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXktFKmurk%3D, 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2558-2563.2005, 15870346

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahman M M, Roberts H L S, Sarjan M, et al. Induction and transmission of Bacillus thuringiensis tolerance in the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 2696–2699, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitlWiurc%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0306669101, 14978282

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rahman M M, Roberts H L S, Schmidt O. Tolerance to Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin in immune-suppressed larvae of the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella. J Invertebr Pathol, 2007, 96: 125–132, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVCnt7vL, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.018

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma G, Roberts H, Sarjan M, et al. Is the mature endotoxin Cry1Ac from Bacillus thuringiensis inactivated by a coagulation reaction in the gut lumen of resistant, Helicoverpa armigera larvae? Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2005, 35: 729–739, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1Ois70%3D, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.011, 15894190

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Luo S D, Wang G R, Liang G M, et al. Binding of three Cry1A toxins in resistant and susceptible strains of cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2006, 85: 104–109, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XksVOjt7Y%3D, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.11.003

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Caccia S, Hernández-Rodríguez C S, Mahon R J, et al. Binding site alteration is responsible for field-isolated resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A insecticidal proteins in two Helicoverpa species. PloS ONE, 2010, 5: e9975, 10.1371/journal.pone.0009975, 20376312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bravo A, Soberó M. How to cope with insect resistance to Bt toxins? Trends Biotechnol, 2008, 26: 573–579, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFajurjN, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.06.005, 18706722

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jurat-Fuentes J L, Gahan L J, Gould F L, et al. The HevCaLP protein mediates binding specificity of the Cry1A class of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in Heliothis virescens. Biochemistry, 2004, 43: 14299–14305, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXotlKlu7k%3D, 10.1021/bi048500i, 15518581

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu C X, Wu K M, Wu Y D, et al. Reduction of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxicity against Helicoverpa armigera by a soluble toxin-binding cadherin fragment. J Insect Physiol, 2009, 55: 686–693, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnslyrur8%3D, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.05.001, 19446559

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gahan L J, Gould F, Heckel D G. Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens. Science, 2001, 293: 857–860, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlvVKktLo%3D, 10.1126/science.1060949, 11486086

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Morin S, Biggs R W, Sisterson M S, et al. Three cadherin alleles associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 5004–5009, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjs1yju7Y%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0831036100, 12695565

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhao J, Jin L, Yang Y H, et al. Diverse cadherin mutations conferring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2010, 40: 113–118, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXis1ShtLY%3D, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.01.001, 20079435

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liao C Y, Trowell S, Akhuist R. Purification and characterization of Cry1Ac toxin binding proteins from the brush border membrane of Helicoverpa armigera midgut. Curr Microbiol, 2005, 51: 367–371, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1yktb3P, 10.1007/s00284-005-0051-9, 16252132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ingle S, Trivedi N, Prasad R, et al. Aminopeptidase-N from the Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) brush border membrane vesicles as a receptor of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin. Curr Microbiol, 2001, 43: 255–259, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlvFWqsL4%3D, 10.1007/s002840010297, 11683359

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang G R, Liang G M, Wu K M, et al. Gene cloning and sequencing of aminopeptidase N3, a putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry1Ac toxin in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Eur J Entomol, 2005, 102: 13–19, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjsF2jt74%3D

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sivakumar S, Rajagopal R, Venkatesh G, et al. Knockdown of aminopeptidase-N from Helicoverpa armigera larvae and in transfected Sf21 cells by RNA interference reveals its functional interaction with Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein Cry1Ac. J Biol Chem, 2007, 282: 7312–7319, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXitlSrtr4%3D, 10.1074/jbc.M607442200, 17213205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu C X, Gao Y L, Ning C M, et al. Antisera-mediated in vivo reduction of Cry1Ac toxicity in Helicoverpa armigera. J Insect Physiol, 2010, 56: 718–724, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmslCis7s%3D, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.12.012, 20035762

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Herrero S, Gechev, T, Bakker P, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ca-resistant Spodoptera exigua lacks expression of one of four aminopeptidase N genes. BMC Genomics, 2005, 6: 96, 10.1186/1471-2164-6-96, 15978131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang S P, Cheng H M, Gao Y L, et al. Mutation of an aminopeptidase N gene is associated with Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2009, 39: 421–429, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnt1Gkurs%3D, 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.04.003, 19376227

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ning C M, Wu K M, Liu C X, et al. Characterization of a Cry1Ac toxin-binding alkaline phosphatase in the midgut from Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) larvae. J Insect Physiol, 2010, 56: 666–672, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXlsFagtr4%3D, 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.02.003, 20170658

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Arenas I, Bravo A, Soberón M, et al. Role of alkaline phosphatase from Manduca sexta in the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. J Biol Chem, 2010, 285: 12497–12503, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXkvVGjtL4%3D, 10.1074/jbc.M109.085266, 20177063

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jurat-Fuentes J L, Adang M J. Characterization of a Cry1Ac-receptor alkaline phosphatase in susceptible and resistant Heliothis virescens larvae. Eur J Biochem, 2004, 271: 3127–3135, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmsFCitrw%3D, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04238.x, 15265032

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jurat-Fuentes J L, Adang M J. A proteomic approach to study resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins in Heliothis virescens larvae. J Invertebr Pathol, 2007, 95: 187–191, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVOntro%3D, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.01.008, 17467006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shelton A M, Zhao J Z, Roush R T. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annu Rev Entomol, 2002, 47: 845–881, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvVWluw%3D%3D, 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309, 11729093

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tabashnik B E, Gassmann A J, Crowder D W, et al. Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 21: 199–202, 10.1038/nbt1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wu K M, Guo Y Y, Gao S S. Evaluation of the natural refuge function for Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) within Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic cotton growing areas in northern China. J Econ Entomol, 2002, 95: 832–837, 10.1603/0022-0493-95.4.832, 12216828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu K M, Feng H Q, Guo Y Y. Evaluation of maize as a refuge for management of resistance to Bt cotton by Helicoverpa armigera in the Yellow River cotton-farming region of China. Crop Prot, 2004, 23: 523–530, 10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wu K M. Monitoring and management strategy for Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bt cotton in China. J Invertebr Pathol, 2007, 95: 220–223, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.012, 17467730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wu K M, Guo Y Y. The evolution of cotton pest management practices in China. Annu Rev Entomol, 2005, 50: 31–52, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFOqt7w%3D, 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130349, 15355239

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhao J Z, Cao J, Li Y X, et al. Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution. Nat Biotechnol, 2003, 21: 1493–1497, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpt1GltLo%3D, 10.1038/nbt907, 14608363

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Farrell T. Cotton Pest Management Guide 2006/7. NSW department of primary industries, Orange, NSW, Australia, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  68. Downes S, Mahon R, Olsen K. Monitoring and adaptive resistance management in Australia for Bt-cotton: Current status and future challenges. J Invertebr Pathol, 2007, 95: 208–213, 10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.010, 17470372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ravi K C, Mohan K S, Manjunath T M, et al. Relative abundance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host crops in India and the role of these crops as natural refuge for Bacillus thuringiensis cotton. Environ Entomol, 2005, 34: 59–69, 10.1603/0046-225X-34.1.59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu K M, Guo Y Y, Head G. Resistance monitoring of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Nocutuidae) to Bt insecticidal protein during 2001–2004 in China. J Econ Entomol, 2006, 99: 893–898, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpslyht7w%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493-99.3.893, 16813327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Feng H Q, Wu K M, Cheng D F, et al. Northward migration of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and other moths in early summer observed with radar in northern China. J Econ Entomol, 2004, 97: 1874–1883, 10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.1874, 15666739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Feng H Q, Wu K M, Ni Y X, et al. Return migration of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) during autumn in northern China. B Entomol Res, 2005, 95: 361–370, 10.1079/BER2005367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Burd A D, Gould F, Bradley J R, et al. Estimated frequency of non-recessive Bt resistance genes in bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Bolddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in eastern North Carolina. J Econ Entomol, 2003, 96: 137–142, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhslOiurk%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493-96.1.137, 12650356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gao Y L, Wu K M, Gould F. iFrequency of Bt resistance alleles in H. armigera during 2006–2008 in Northern China. Environ Entomol, 2009, 38: 1336–1342, 10.1603/022.038.0445, 19689916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Li G P, Wu K M, Gould F, et al. Increasing tolerance to Cry1Ac cotton from cotton bollworm was confirmed in Bt cotton farming area of China. Ecol Entomol, 2007, 32: 366–375, 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00891.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Mahon R J, Olsen K M, Downes S, et al. Frequency of alleles conferring resistance to the Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in Australian population of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol, 2007, 100: 1844–1853, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXot12guw%3D%3D, 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1844:FOACRT]2.0.CO;2, 18232402

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Andow D A, Alstad D N. F2 screen for rare resistance alleles. J Econ Entomol, 1998, 91: 572–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhao J Z, Cao J, Collins H L, et al. Concurrent use of transgenic plants expressing a single and two Bt genes speeds insect adaptation to pyramided plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 8426–8430, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlsFCgsL4%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0409324102, 15939892

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kranthi S, Dhawad C S, Naidu S, et al. Susceptibility of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry2Ab before and after the introduction of Bollgard-II. Crop prot, 2009, 28: 371–375, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsV2ksr4%3D, 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.12.001

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to KongMing Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, C., Li, Y., Gao, Y. et al. Cotton bollworm resistance to Bt transgenic cotton: A case analysis. Sci. China Life Sci. 53, 934–941 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-010-4045-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-010-4045-x

Keywords

  • Helicoverpa armigera
  • Bt resistance
  • transgenic cotton
  • resistance mechanism
  • management strategies