Abstract
Recently, a three-component coupling reaction for efficient construction of gem-diarylmethine silanes was developed, utilizing a Pd-Ming-Phos catalyst. To explore the underlying mechanism governing this intriguing reaction, we have conducted comprehensive density functional theory (DFT) computations (M06-L/SDD/6-311++G(d,p)/SMD//B3LYP-D3/lanl2dz/6-31G(d,p)). DFT calculations reveal that the oxidative addition of ArBr to Pd(0) is the rate-determining step, and the carbenation process of PhCHN2 to Pd(II) is the enantioselectivity-determining step. Moreover, the Ming-Phos ligand exhibits a self-adaptive nature, allowing it to dynamically adapt its coordination patterns with the metal center in different elementary steps, thereby enhancing the overall reactivity. The enantioselectivity is determined by both the trans effect and the side-arm effect of the ligand. This mechanism nicely explains why TY-Phos with P-tBu2 instead of the Ming-Phos with P-Ph2 results in poor reactivity and much reduced enantioselectivity. This study not only provides deeper insights into the functioning principles of SadPhos ligands but also offers valuable guidance for future ligand modifications and optimizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Min GK, Hernandez D, Skrydstrup T. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46: 457–470
Franz AK, Wilson SO. J Med Chem, 2013, 56: 388–405
Guo J, Cheng Z, Chen J, Chen X, Lu Z. Acc Chem Res, 2021, 54: 2701–2716
Bergens SH, Noheda P, Whelan J, Bosnich B. J Am Chem Soc, 1992, 114: 2121–2128
Jensen JF, Svendsen BY, la Cour TV, Pedersen HL, Johannsen M. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124: 4558–4559
Gribble Jr. MW, Pirnot MT, Bandar JS, Liu RY, Buchwald SL. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 2192–2195
Cheng B, Lu P, Zhang H, Cheng X, Lu Z. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 9439–9442
Scharfbier J, Gross BM, Oestreich M. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 1577–1580
Huo J, Zhong K, Xue Y, Lyu MM, Ping Y, Liu Z, Lan Y, Wang J. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143: 12968–12973
Huang ZD, Ding R, Wang P, Xu YH, Loh TP. Chem Commun, 2016, 52: 5609–5612
Balakrishnan V, Murugesan V, Chindan B, Rasappan R. Org Lett, 2021, 23: 1333–1338
Su B, Zhou TG, Xu PL, Shi ZJ, Hartwig JF. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 7205–7208
Park D, Baek D, Lee CW, Ryu H, Park S, Han W, Hong S. Tetrahedron, 2021, 79: 131811–131818
Huang MY, Yang JM, Zhao YT, Zhu SF. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 5353–5357
Yang LL, Evans D, Xu B, Li WT, Li ML, Zhu SF, Houk KN, Zhou QL. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 12394–12399
Jagannathan JR, Fettinger JC, Shaw JT, Franz AK. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 11674–11679
Yang B, Cao K, Zhao G, Yang J, Zhang J. J Am Chem Soc, 2022, 144: 15468–15474
Zhang ZM, Chen P, Li W, Niu Y, Zhao XL, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53: 4350–4354
Su X, Zhou W, Li Y, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 6874–6877
Wang Y, Zhang P, Di X, Dai Q, Zhang ZM, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 15905–15909
Zhang ZM, Xu B, Qian Y, Wu L, Wu Y, Zhou L, Liu Y, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 10373–10377
Han J, Zhou W, Zhang PC, Wang H, Zhang R, Wu HH, Zhang J. ACS Catal, 2019, 9: 6890–6895
Qiu H, Chen X, Zhang J. Chem Sci, 2019, 10: 10510–10515
Lin T, Pan Z, Tu Y, Zhu S, Wu H, Liu Y, Li Z, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59: 22957–22962
Zhao G, Wu Y, Wu HH, Yang J, Zhang J. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143: 17983–17988
Zhou Q-L. Privileged Chiral Ligands and Catalysts. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011
Xiao B, Sun TY, Wu YD. J Org Chem, 2022, 87: 10958–10966
Han J, Xiao B, Sun TY, Wang M, Jin L, Yu W, Wang Y, Fang DM, Zhou Y, Wu XF, Wu YD, Liao J. J Am Chem Soc, 2022, 144: 21800–21807
Zhang S, Perveen S, Ouyang YZ, et al. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61
Tse MH, Zhong RL, Kwong FY. ACS Catal, 2022, 12: 3507–3515
Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ. J Phys Chem, 1994, 98: 11623–11627
Hay PJ, Wadt WR. J Chem Phys, 1985, 82: 270–283
Huzinaga S. Comput Phys Rep, 1985, 2: 281–339
Ehlers AW, Böhme M, Dapprich S, Gobbi A, Höllwarth A, Jonas V, Köhler KF, Stegmann R, Veldkamp A, Frenking G. Chem Phys Lett, 1993, 208: 111–114
Kulkarni AD, Truhlar DG. J Chem Theor Comput, 2011, 7: 2325–2332
Andrae D, Häußermann U, Dolg M, Stoll H, Preuß H. Theoret Chim Acta, 1990, 77: 123–141
Clark T, Chandrasekhar J, Spitznagel GW, Schleyer PVR. J Comput Chem, 1983, 4: 294–301
Francl MM, Pietro WJ, Hehre WJ, Binkley JS, Gordon MS, DeFrees DJ, Pople JA. J Chem Phys, 1982, 77: 3654–3665
Krishnan R, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA. J Chem Phys, 1980, 72: 650–654
McLean AD, Chandler GS. J Chem Phys, 1980, 72: 5639–5648
Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. J Phys Chem B, 2009, 113: 6378–6396
Lu T, Chen F. J Comput Chem, 2012, 33: 580–592
Contreras-García J, Johnson ER, Keinan S, Chaudret R, Piquemal JP, Beratan DN, Yang W. J Chem Theor Comput, 2011, 7: 625–632
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. J Mol Graphics, 1996, 14: 33–38
Brookhart M, Green MLH, Parkin G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 6908–6914
Piers WE, Bercaw JE. J Am Chem Soc, 1990, 112: 9406–9407
Holaday MGD, Tarafdar G, Kumar A, Reddy MLP, Srinivasan A. Dalton Trans, 2014, 43: 7699–7703
Race JJ, Burnage AL, Boyd TM, Heyam A, Martínez-Martínez AJ, Macgregor SA, Weller AS. Chem Sci, 2021, 12: 8832–8843
Yue X, Shan C, Qi X, Luo X, Zhu L, Zhang T, Li Y, Li Y, Bai R, Lan Y. Dalton Trans, 2018, 47: 1819–1826
Fukui K. Acc Chem Res, 1981, 14: 363–368
Pearson RG. J Am Chem Soc, 1963, 85: 3533–3539
Feng J, Shi J, Wei L, Liu M, Li Z, Xiao Y, Zhang J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2023, 62: e202215407
Jia T, Zhang M, McCollom SP, Bellomo A, Montel S, Mao J, Dreher SD, Welch CJ, Regalado EL, Williamson RT, Manor BC, Tomson NC, Walsh PJ. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 8337–8345
Bonney KJ, Schoenebeck F. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43: 6609–6638
Uehling MR, King RP, Krska SW, Cernak T, Buchwald SL. Science, 2019, 363: 405–408
Torres GM, Liu Y, Arndtsen BA. Science, 2020, 368: 318–323
Ariafard A, Lin Z. Organometallics, 2006, 25: 4030–4033
Qi X, Lan Y. Acc Chem Res, 2021, 54: 2905–2915
Labinger JA. Organometallics, 2015, 34: 4784–4795
Liao S, Sun XL, Tang Y. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47: 2260–2272
Zhou J, Tang Y. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124: 9030–9031
Zhou YY, Wang LJ, Li J, Sun XL, Tang Y. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134: 9066–9069
Zeineddine A, Estévez L, Mallet-Ladeira S, Miqueu K, Amgoune A, Bourissou D. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 565–573
Kang QK, Lin Y, Li Y, Shi H. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 3706–3711
Contreras-Garcia J, Johnson ER, Keinan S, Chaudret R, Piquemal JP, Beratan DN, Yang W. J Chem Theor Comput, 2011, 7: 625–632
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21933004), the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B010188001, 2020B0101350001), the Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (GXWD20201231165807007-20200812124825001) and the Shenzhen Bay Laboratory Supercomputing Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supporting information The supporting information is available online at https://chem.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com/journal/11426. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without type-setting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.
Supporting Information for
11426_2023_1701_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Theoretical Insight into the Activity and Selectivity in Palladium/Ming-Phos-Catalyzed Three-Component Asymmetric Synthesis of gem-Diarylmethine Silanes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, B., Sun, TY., Zhang, J. et al. Theoretical insight into the activity and selectivity in palladium/Ming-Phos-catalyzed three-component asymmetric synthesis of gem-diarylmethine silanes. Sci. China Chem. 66, 2817–2827 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-023-1701-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-023-1701-7