Advertisement

Science China Chemistry

, Volume 57, Issue 10, pp 1409–1417 | Cite as

VBEFP/PCM: a QM/MM/PCM approach for valence-bond method and its application for the vertical excitations of formaldehyde and acetone in aqueous solution

  • Jing Huang
  • FuMing Ying
  • PeiFeng Su
  • Wei Wu
Articles Special Issue Quantum Chemistry for Extended Systems—In honor of Prof. J.M. André for his 70th birthday

Abstract

In this paper, a combined QM/MM/PCM approach, named VBEFP/PCM, is presented for ab initio VB study with a solvent effect incorporated. In VBEFP/PCM, both short-range and long-range solvent effects are taken into account by effective fragment potential (EFP) and polarizable continuum model (PCM), respectively, while the solute molecules are described by valence bond (VB) wave function. Furthermore, VBEFP/PCM, along with VBPCM and VBEFP, is employed for the n→π* vertical excitation of formaldehyde and acetone molecules in aqueous solution. The computational results show that VBEFP/PCM can provide the appropriate solvent shifts, whereas VBPCM underestimates the solvent shifts due to its lack of short-range solvent effect. The VBEFP results strongly rely upon the description of the short-range solvent effect. To explore the role of the solute’s electronic structure in the solvent shift, resonance energy analysis during the excitation is performed. It was found that the solute’s electronic polarization plays the most important role in the solvent shift. The resonance controls the variation of the solute’s wave function during the n→* vertical excitation, which leads to the blue solvent shifts.

Keywords

ab initio valence bond solvent effects VBEFP/PCM solvent shifts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Canuto S. Solvation Effects on Molecules and Biomolecules: Computational Methods and Applications. New York: Springer, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem Rev, 2005, 105: 2999–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song L, Wu W, Zhang Q, Shaik S. VBPCM: a valence bond method that incorporates a polarizable continuum model. J Phys Chem A, 2004, 108: 6017–6024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Su P, Wu W, Kelly CP, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. VBSM: a solvation model based on valence bond theory. J Phys Chem A, 2008, 112: 12761–12768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem Rev, 2005, 105: 2999–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly CP, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. SM6: a density functional theory continuum solvation model for calculating aqueous solvation free energies of neutrals, ions, and solute-water clusters. J Chem Theory Comput, 2005, 1: 1133–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marenich AV, Olson RM, Kelly CP, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Self-consistent reaction field model for aqueous and nonaqueous solutions based on accurate polarized partial charges. J Chem Theory Comput, 2007, 3: 2011–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warshel A. Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions in Enzymes and Solutions. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1991Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ying F, Chang X, Su P, Wu W. VBEFP: a valence bond approach that incorporates effective fragment potential method. J Phys Chem A, 2012, 116: 1846–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon MS, Freitag MA, Bandyopadhyay P, Jensen JH, Kairys V, Stevens WJ. The effective fragment potential method: a QM-based MM approach to modeling environmental effects in chemistry. J Phys Chem A, 2000, 105: 293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Improta R, Barone V. Interplay of electronic, environmental, and vibrational effects in determining the hyperfine coupling constants of organic free radicals. Chem Rev, 2004, 104: 1231–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bandyopadhyay P, Gordon MS, Mennucci B, Tomasi J. An integrated effective fragment-polarizable continuum approach to solvation: theory and application to glycine. J Chem Phys, 2002, 116: 5023–5032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li H, Pomelli CS, Jensen JH. Continuum solvation of large molecules described by QM/MM: a semi-iterative implementation of thePCM/EFP interface. Theor Chem Acc, 2003, 109: 71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blair JT, Krogh-Jespersen K, Levy RM. Solvent effects on optical absorption spectra: the 1A11A2 transition of formaldehyde in water. J Am Chem Soc, 1989, 111: 6948–6956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, Gao J. Solvatochromic shifts of the n→p* transition of acetone from steam vapor to ambient aqueous solution: a combined configuration interaction QM/MM simulation study incorporating solvent polarization. J Chem Theory Comput, 2007, 3: 1484–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li H. Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical/continuum style solvation model: linear response theory, variational treatment, and nuclear gradients. J Chem Phys, 2009, 131: 184103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li YK, Zhu Q, Li XY, Fu KX, Wang XJ, Cheng XM. Spectral shift of the n→p* transition for acetone and formic acid with an explicit solvent model. J Phys Chem A, 2010, 115: 232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Sorting out the relative contributions of electrostatic polarization, dispersion, and hydrogen bonding to solvatochromic shifts on vertical electronic excitation energies. J Chem Theory Comput, 2010, 6: 2829–2844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Angeli C, Borini S, Ferrighi L, Cimiraglia R. Ab initio n-electron valence state perturbation theory study of the adiabatic transitions in carbonyl molecules: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone. J Chem Phys, 2005, 122: 114304–114310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Improta R, Scalmani G, Frisch MJ, Barone V. Toward effective and reliable fluorescence energies in solution by a new state specific polarizable continuum model time dependent density functional theory approach. J Chem Phys, 2007, 127: 074504–074509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lupieri P, Ippoliti E, Altoè P, Garavelli M, Mwalaba M, Carloni P. Spectroscopic properties of formaldehyde in aqueous solution: insights from car-parrinello and TDDFT/CASPT2 calculations. J Chem Theory Comput, 2010, 6: 3403–3409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu Z, Matsika S. Combined multireference configuration interaction/molecular dynamics approach for calculating solvatochromic shifts: application to the n→p* electronic transition of formaldehyde. J Phys Chem A, 2006, 110: 12035–12043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kongsted J, Osted A, Pedersen TB, Mikkelsen KV, Christiansen O. The n→π* electronic transition in microsolvated formaldehyde. A coupled cluster and combined coupled cluster/molecular mechanics study. J Phys Chem A, 2004, 108: 8624–8632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li J, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Two-response-time model based on CM2/INDO/S2 electrostatic potentials for the dielectric polarization component of solvatochromic shifts on vertical excitation energies. Int J Quantum Chem, 2000, 77: 264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu W, Su P, Shaik S, Hiberty PC. Classical valence bond approach by modern methods. Chem Rev, 2011, 111: 7557–7593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA. General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem, 1993, 14: 1347–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cossi M, Rega N, Scalmani G, Barone V. Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C-PCM solvation model. J Comput Chem, 2003, 24: 669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Su P, Li H. Continuous and smooth potential energy surface for conductorlike screening solvation model using fixed points with variable areas. J Chem Phys, 2009, 130: 074109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA, Skiff WM. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc, 1992, 114: 10024–10035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen Z, Zhang Q, Wu W. A new algorithm for inactive orbital optimization in valence bond theory. Sci China Ser B-Chem, 2009, 52: 1879–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen Z, Chen X, Wu W. Nonorthogonal orbital based n-body reduced density matrices and their applications to valence bond theory. II. An efficient algorithm for matrix elements and analytical energy gradients in vbscf method. J Chem Phys, 2013, 138: 164120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen Z, Chen X, Wu W. Nonorthogonal orbital based n-body reduced density matrices and their applications to valence bond theory. I. Hamiltonian matrix elements between internally contracted excited valence bond wave functions. J Chem Phys, 2013, 138: 164119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Song L, Chen Z, Ying F, Song J, Chen X, Su P, Mo Y, Zhang Q, Wu W. XMVB 2.0: an ab initio non-orthogonal valence bond program. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2012Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Song L, Mo Y, Zhang Q, Wu W. XMVB: a program for ab initio nonorthogonal valence bond computations. J Comput Chem, 2005, 26: 514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weyl H. The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. New York: Dover, 1950Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Su P, Song L, Wu W, Hiberty PC, Shaik S. A valence bond study of the dioxygen molecule. J Comput Chem, 2007, 28: 185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Su P, Wu W, Shaik S, Hiberty PC. A valence bond study of the low-lying states of the nf molecule. ChemPhysChem, 2008, 9: 1442–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Su P, Wu J, Gu J, Wu W, Shaik S, Hiberty PC. Bonding conundrums in the C2 molecule: a valence bond study. J Chem Theory Comput, 2010, 7: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brand JCD. 184. The electronic spectrum of formaldehyde. J Chem Soc (Resumed), 1956: 858–872Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walzl KN, Koerting CF, Kuppermann A. Electron-impact spectroscopy of acetaldehyde. J Chem Phys, 1987, 87: 3796–3803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bayliss NS, McRae EG. Solvent effects in the spectra of acetone, crotonaldehyde, nitromethane and nitrobenzene. J Phys Chem, 1954, 58: 1006–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paul S. Invited review solvatochromic shifts: the influence of the medium on the energy of electronic states. J Photochem Photobiol A, 1990, 50: 293–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bercovici T, King J, Becker RS. Formaldehyde: comprehensive spectral investigation as a function of solvent and temperature. J Chem Phys, 1972, 56: 3956–3963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Naka K, Morita A, Kato S. Effect of solvent fluctuation on the electronic transitions of formaldehyde in aqueous solution. J Chem Phys, 1999, 110: 3484–3492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kongsted J, Osted A, Mikkelsen KV, Astrand PO, Christiansen O. Solvent effects on the n→p* electronic transition in formaldehyde: a combined coupled cluster/molecular dynamics study. J Chem Phys, 2004, 121: 8435–8445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bayliss NS, Wills-Johnson G. Solvent effects on the intensities of the weak ultraviolet spectra of ketones and nitroparaffins-I. Spectrochim Acta A, 1968, 24: 551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hayes WP, Timmons CJ. Solvent and substituent effects on the n→p* absorption bands of some ketones. Spectrochimica Acta, 1965, 21: 529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Crescenzi O, Pavone M, De Angelis F, Barone V. Solvent effects on the UV (n→p*) and NMR(13C and 17O) spectra of acetone in aqueous solution. An integrated car-parrinello and DFT/PCM approach. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 109: 445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bernasconi L, Sprik M, Hutter J. Time dependent density functional theory study of charge-transfer and intramolecular electronic excitations in acetone-water systems. J Chem Phys, 2003, 119: 12417–12431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gao J. Monte carlo quantum mechanical-configuration interaction and molecular mechanics simulation of solvent effects on the n→p* blue shift of acetone. J Am Chem Soc, 1994, 116: 9324–9328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry and College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringXiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations